On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 6:04 AM, Eric Van Hensbergen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It'd be nice to have something which supported the virtio transport
It would be nice if 9mount and/or 9bind could do an unshare to create
a new namespace,
Some support for the loose cache would be nice, and I don't
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 4:04 PM, Eric Van Hensbergen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lucho had a mount helper at one time that was able to use p9p to
authenticate when necessary -- this would be a nice feature to include
in the mount helper but is difficult to include without p9p as a
dependency.
because I'm difficult you may need to [...]
-eric
Amen.
Thanks for the patch, Uriel.
The http://swtch.com/v9fs script stopped working
a long time ago, and I never bothered to find
out why. I've changed the text on that page,
though clicking on the date and checksums
link has always shown that the last update
was October 2006.
A few p9p
By the way, where can one find the git tree with the latest v9fs? I
was googling and struggling with the swik 'thing' (words fail me...),
but couldn't find it, I know it is somewhere...
The latest is in linus' head branch on kernel.org.
being unfamilar with this jargon, i initially misread
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 5:10 PM, Russ Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the patch, Uriel.
The http://swtch.com/v9fs script stopped working
a long time ago, and I never bothered to find
out why. I've changed the text on that page,
though clicking on the date and checksums
link has
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 11:53 PM, Eric Van Hensbergen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Whatever function deals with passing the options to the mount system
call needs the modification. The few changes that are there may be
fixed by me doing a better job and supporting old names for options,
but it
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 11:10 PM, Russ Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wrote a new user-level file server a month ago,
something I hadn't done in years, and I did it on Linux,
using lib9p backed by 9pfuse. It was an entirely pleasant
experience.
Speaking of 9pfuse - I've just pulled and the
Also any other feedback on what changes and improvements 9mount might
need before it can be made part of p9p (or maybe shipped with the
standard linux mount(1) tools?).
I'll take a look today so I'm up to date on the current station and
let you know. Basically it will probably be best to
Fuse on the Mac is markedly inferior.
-rob
Speaking of 9pfuse - I've just pulled and the version distributed
with p9p is still not going to work on linux/x86_64. I posted a patch
for this[1], though 9fans.net doesn't appear to archive attachments -
see http://sqweek.dnsdojo.org/tmp/9pfuse.LARGEFILE.diff
Done.
Also, I've sent you a
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 6:21 PM, Russ Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A few p9p programs--acme, tapefs, vacfs--now
accept a -m option directing them to mount at a
particular place in the directory tree, via 9pfuse.
There is no option to mount via the Linux 9p module.
Why not have them use p9p's
The ability to mount file descriptors has been in for a few years (at
least since 2006). trans=fd allows you to mount from a file
descriptor (or from separate read and write file descriptors). The
code should be functional, but it is not something which currently
gets regressed very often.
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 6:59 AM, Russ Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, I've sent you a couple of emails off-list recently about a bug
in 9p(1). I can't think of anything I might have done to offend you,
so I'm assuming they've been marked as spam or otherwise waylaid -
should I just post
Thanks for your reply, but I'm not clear what you mean: should p9p's
mount check the kernel version? or are you talking about 9mount?
By the way, where can one find the git tree with the latest v9fs? I
was googling and struggling with the swik 'thing' (words fail me...),
but couldn't find it, I
15 matches
Mail list logo
