Dear Phil,
%%staves {1 2 3 4}
Will typeset 4 voices on one keyboard staff.
A keyboard staff consists of two coupled staves
that are connected with a { symbol in front of them.
%%staves (1 2)(3 4)
Will print two separate staves, with two voices on each of them.
No { symbol will appear in
From: I. Oppenheim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 6:11 PM
Subject: Re: [abcusers] %%staves
Dear Phil,
%%staves {1 2 3 4}
Will typeset 4 voices on one keyboard staff.
A keyboard staff consists of two coupled staves
that are connected
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Phil Taylor wrote:
%%staves [(1 2)(3 4)]
Gives a score format: two staves, coupled with a large
[ on the left side.
or should that be
%%staves ([1 2)(3 4])
No. That has no defined meaning.
%%staves {1 2 3} a keyboard staff with two voices in the right hand
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Arent Storm wrote:
And what if I want one large { with four staves ?
You could use %%staves [1 2 3 4] instead,
which will place a [ before the staves, though.
We can of course consider to make the semantics of {..}
similar to [...].
I.e: %%staves {1 2 3 4} will print 4
I still have some problems understanding the %%staves directive,
and it still strikes me as being extremely cryptic compared with
putting the same information into V: fields in the header.
So what's the difference between
You can look at
http://anamnese.online.fr/abc/passemedio.pdf
It doesn't
From: I. Oppenheim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Arent Storm wrote:
And what if I want one large { with four staves ?
You could use %%staves [1 2 3 4] instead,
which will place a [ before the staves, though.
We can of course consider to make the semantics of {..}
similar to
I still have some problems understanding the %%staves directive,
and it still strikes me as being extremely cryptic compared with
putting the same information into V: fields in the header.
So what's the difference between
You can look at
http://anamnese.online.fr/abc/passemedio.pdf
Oh, I've
Eric Galluzzo donned his asbestos suit and opined:
|
| Regarding %%staves
| --
|
| I personally find %%staves very useful, and (despite comments to the
| contrary) very intuitive. How about adding some official variant of
| this to the standard? It seems much more concise, and
