[abcusers] K:none

2004-08-18 Thread Atte André Jensen
Hi Some tunes are not in any specific key, but it seems abc doesn't have any way to notate this. If I use K:C the song is shown correctly, but this opviously is corrupted when transposing it. Is there a solution withinn the current abc definition that I overlooked or should we consider

RE: [abcusers] K:none

2004-08-18 Thread Richard Walker
consider extending the K: to allow K:none? What tune has no key signature? I'm confused. To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html

Re: [abcusers] K:none

2004-08-18 Thread Phil Taylor
On 18 Aug 2004, at 08:07, Atte André Jensen wrote: Hi Some tunes are not in any specific key, but it seems abc doesn't have any way to notate this. If I use K:C the song is shown correctly, but this opviously is corrupted when transposing it. Is there a solution withinn the current abc

Re: [abcusers] K:none

2004-08-18 Thread Atte André Jensen
Phil Taylor wrote: On 18 Aug 2004, at 08:07, Atte André Jensen wrote: snip should we consider extending the K: to allow K:none? It has been suggested before, and seems not unreasonable. Ok, so how to proceed? Transposition routines would have to be re-written to deal with it though. Currently

Re: [abcusers] K:none

2004-08-18 Thread John Chambers
Atte asked: | Some tunes are not in any specific key, but it seems abc doesn't have | any way to notate this. If I use K:C the song is shown correctly, but | this opviously is corrupted when transposing it. | | Is there a solution withinn the current abc definition that I overlooked | or should we

[abcusers] [parser] A proposal

2004-08-18 Thread Remo D.
Hi there! Thanks to the ones that answered my last question. In the end I opted for re2c to create the scanner. I've prepared a little bit more detailed description of my ideas for a generic parser. Following Christian Cepel advice the thing has been named ABCp. Please head to