Re: [abcusers] how well supported is the overlay operator

2004-11-12 Thread Phil Taylor
On 12 Nov 2004, at 02:16, Richard Robinson wrote: On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 11:23:59PM +, Phil Taylor wrote: On 11 Nov 2004, at 20:32, Atte André Jensen wrote: Hi I'm wondering how standard the overlay operator is? Which programs supports the following for instance: L:1/8 | G3G- G2FG [C8D8] |

Re: [abcusers] how well supported is the overlay operator

2004-11-12 Thread Richard Robinson
On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 10:35:11AM +, Phil Taylor wrote: On 12 Nov 2004, at 02:16, Richard Robinson wrote: On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 11:23:59PM +, Phil Taylor wrote: On 11 Nov 2004, at 20:32, Atte André Jensen wrote: Hi I'm wondering how standard the overlay operator is? Which

Re: [abcusers] JC's tune finder mirrors?

2004-11-12 Thread RWW Taylor
The mirror cited here works fine for me, at least at the moment. Glad to have this resource functioning again. /RWWT On Friday, November 12, 2004, at 11:02 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does anyone know of a mirror for JC's Tune Finder (and other scripts) at

Re: [abcusers] how well supported is the overlay operator

2004-11-12 Thread Phil Taylor
On 12 Nov 2004, at 14:07, Richard Robinson wrote: From usrguide.tex :- the character is carried straight through to the TeX output and the characters produce a \enotes\notes pair. Thus the input DEFG ABcd A4 e2 c2| produces [2 staves] To explain this to those unfamiliar with MusicTeX, the

Re: [abcusers] Recommendations for graphical entry software

2004-11-12 Thread Don Parrish-Bell
This is probably off-topic, but I think the people on this list would be most qualified to help me! I have given up on Sibelius G7 as being tolerable as a notation entry tool! It fights everything you try to do! I was wondering if anyone on the list has a recommendation for a program that

Re: [abcusers] how well supported is the overlay operator

2004-11-12 Thread John Walsh
Richard Robinson writes: abc2mtex did something with it, didn't it ? But I forget the details. Yes, as a matter of fact, it did. I was just thinking that what goes around, comes around, since this is now appearing once again. (By the way, there's no worry about backward compatibility

Re: [abcusers] how well supported is the overlay operator

2004-11-12 Thread Hudson Lacerda
John Walsh wrote: [snip] A couple of questions. If I read the abcm2ps documentation correctly, it's possible to have two implicitly-defined voices on each staff (making three voices in all) one gotten with and the other with . (The limitation seems to come from the need to

Re: [abcusers] how well supported is the overlay operator

2004-11-12 Thread Richard Robinson
On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 05:53:21PM +, Phil Taylor wrote: On 12 Nov 2004, at 14:07, Richard Robinson wrote: the character is carried straight through to the TeX output and the characters produce a \enotes\notes pair. Thus the input DEFG ABcd A4 e2 c2| produces [2 staves] To explain