The ren tools do not support renaming domains with Exchange integrated into
the schema. That's a quote that pops into my misty, still frozen and
haven't had my coffee yet brains. So that would imply that even if your
domain doesn't have any exchange boxes in it, your forest has, so your stuck
...
We are in the process of a
E2K3 implementation.
Exchange 2003 has been
installed but is not displaying the GAL.
Any feedback would be
great.
Note: The information contained in this email and in any attachments is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may
Yes,
Uni's get bad documentation and a lot of people have misunderstandings around
them.
I
actually saw a post once in one of the ms.pub newsgroups where a softie
indicated that even if a domain was removed from a forest, Uni's from that
domain would still be available.
joe
From:
This should be fun to find people for. There aren't many of us doing perl
with adsi at this point.
joe
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Web Id
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 12:39 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Not sure if this the
Are you not seeing GAL from your legacy Exchange
system, i.e. Exchange 5.5?
Joe
Pelle
Systems Analyst
Information Technology
Valassis / IT
19975 Victor Parkway Livonia, MI
48152
Tel 734.591.7324 Fax 734.632.6151
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.valassis.com/
This message may
Title: RE: [ActiveDir] Background
This may have been a government thing, or
DoD, but Im told you can be personally (and successfully) sued if
someone finds out their SS# is available on the network and you had anything at
all to do with it obviously they are usually on the network
no from E2k3
From: Pelle, Joe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 8:53 AMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD and
E2K3
Are you not seeing GAL
from your legacy Exchange system, i.e. Exchange 5.5?
Joe
Pelle
Systems
Analyst
Information
Technology
Has anyone had a problem removing AD from a DC that was in a
remote site? Were getting some RPC and DNS errors on the box, specifically,
The directory Service failed to find a server to replicate off changes. The
security context could not be established due to a failure in the requested
Can you verify, that RUS (Recipient Update Service) service is
running properly. Also check which server is designated for RUS. See http://support.microsoft.com/?id=288807for RUS
troubleshooting.
Do you get any unusual events in your event log ?
Regards
Matjaz Ladava, MCSE, MCSA, MCT, MVP
**
This E-mail and any files transmitted with it are in
commercial confidence and intended solely for the use of
the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this E-mail in error please notify the
No, it's a dedicated fractional T1
Joe Pelle
Systems Analyst
Information Technology
Valassis / IT
19975 Victor Parkway Livonia, MI 48152
Tel 734.591.7324 Fax 734.632.6151
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.valassis.com/
This message may have included proprietary or protected information. This
Hi. :)
Ok, I am trying to get a feel for an issue we are dealing with MS on right
now and wanted to hear how many people have encountered it and their
workarounds if different from our thoughts.
You may recall my previous gripes concerning DL management by Exchange users
via outlook when dealing
RPC errors normally indicate name resolution problems. Can you
verify with nslookup that your name resolution is working as it should ? How are
this sites connected ?
Regards
Matjaz Ladava, MCSE, MCSA, MCT, MVP Microsoft MVP - Active
Directory[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL
**
This E-mail and any files transmitted with it are in
commercial confidence and intended solely for the use of
the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this E-mail in error please notify the
Exchange 5.5 anyone? :-)
I fully agree that the issue should be resolved on the Exchange side, rather
than on AD. I can't understand why Exchange has domain dependencies when
talking to the GC. The big benefit of the GC is its domain independence.
As a kludge you could maybe force the Outlook
SuperScan
http://www.foundstone.com/index.htm?subnav=resources/navigation.htmsubc
ontent=/resources/overview.htm
-Original Message-
From: Jason Benway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 11:20 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: [ActiveDir] OT: port scanning
Title: Message
Can and should may be two different things here.
Can you do what you say? Yes. Each node runs
independently of the others in terms of applications. The degree of
difficulty is way up because you have to design with the idea that a node can
run all or any mixture of apps
Title: Message
Al,
you
bring up a good point for us. We are most worried about the production SQL DB
and the jobs machine. We could care less if the Query box goes down because we
don't need 24x7 uptime on that piece. The other machines, however, do need that
up time. I guess that now we
How about portqry in a batch script.
Todd
-Original Message-
From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 11:28 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: port scanning software
SuperScan
Title: Message
I
would play with it in VMWare simulation100 times before I attempted
it.
Todd
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 1:38
AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE:
[ActiveDir] Renaming a Domain
Tony's on to something that has worked for many other Exchange deployments
that ran into the read-only copy issue of the GC. What you're referring to
as an Exchange problem could really be looked at as an Outlook/MAPI problem
if you want to split hairs. Exchange runs fine, but the Outlook
Does anyone know of a process or service that locks a user
profile even when logged off? We are trying to migrate
local profiles using ADMT and are
receiving an error message that the profile is in use. We have even tried rebooting the pc and not
logging on and still receive the same error
Check to see if there's a service running on the machine
using the user's credentials. This will lock the
profile.
-doug
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ellis,
DebbieSent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 2:31 PMTo:
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: [ActiveDir] User
It's that Mysterious error they talk about in the ADMT 2.0 docs, that they say is
unknown cause of it.
Do a shutdown and reboot of your workstations before you migrate them, and it solves
this problem. I meant to send out verification and reboot scripts this week since
someone asked this
I did do a shutdown and reboot but it did not solve the problem.
-Original Message-
From: Jef Kazimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 3:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: re: [ActiveDir] User Profile
It's that Mysterious error they
Hi,
I am tryign to resolve the dns aging timestamp 01/7/1601 --.
Can any one explain why I am still seeing the 01/7/1601 timestamp at the
aging property after I have already enabled the aging/scavenging feature at
our dns server , forward zones and some selective ( want to see the impact
Is it just one profile on this machine that isn't migrating, or all
profiles? Same problem on other machines?
-Original Message-
From: Ellis, Debbie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 1:10 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] User Profile
I did
Have you done the Age All Records (DNSCMD /AgeAllrecords command)
Records with TS before Scavenging was turned on at the server/domain level will not be
scavenged, so you need to AgeAllRecords after enabling scavenging.
It will inherit the scavengeing attributes from the zone itself.
your new
Title: [ActiveDir] maxPwdAge property on AD2003
We have a strange problem... there are many examples of vbscripts for checking the password expiration setting on a domain. It is set on the empty root domain, but not on the child domain. So all the scripts correctly report that the max
29 matches
Mail list logo
