RE: [ActiveDir] AD DNS along with Bind

2006-05-25 Thread Thommes, Michael M.
, IL 60439-4828 IBMMAIL: I1004994 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bernard, Aric Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 4:31 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD DNS along with Bind Why configure the BIND

RE: [ActiveDir] AD DNS along with Bind

2006-05-25 Thread Bernard, Aric
@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD DNS along with Bind (From my DNS admin) If I did that, then I would have to open DNS conduits through our firewalls for the DC, as anyone who was requesting information from any AD zone would be querying the DNS Server on the DC. We try to limit contact

RE: [ActiveDir] AD DNS along with Bind

2006-05-24 Thread Thommes, Michael M.
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Freddy HARTONO Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 8:50 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD DNS along with Bind Hi Mike, If you are delegating those 6 zones to only 1 DNS server, if that dns server is going through

RE: [ActiveDir] AD DNS along with Bind

2006-05-24 Thread Bernard, Aric
and the dynamic updates they require. Could just be a personal preference I suppose... Aric -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thommes, Michael M. Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 12:47 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD DNS

RE: [ActiveDir] AD DNS along with Bind

2006-05-24 Thread Freddy HARTONO
- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thommes, Michael M. Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 3:47 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD DNS along with Bind Hi Freddy, (From my DNS Admin) When any client (or server) machine wants to locate an SRV

RE: [ActiveDir] AD DNS along with Bind

2006-05-24 Thread Freddy HARTONO
Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Freddy HARTONO Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2006 9:09 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD DNS along with Bind Importance: Low Hi Mike, Thanks but personally I don't see why its not delegated to all DNS

RE: [ActiveDir] AD DNS along with Bind

2006-05-23 Thread Thommes, Michael M.
Adeel, Here is a response from our DNS guy. I hope it helps you. Mike Thommes = Here are the steps I took for delegating the AD zones for example.com: 1) In the example.com zone on the BIND server I added these NS records to delegate the zone

RE: [ActiveDir] AD DNS along with Bind

2006-05-23 Thread Adeel Ansari
: [ActiveDir] AD DNS along with Bind Adeel, Here is a response from our DNS guy. I hope it helps you. Mike Thommes = Here are the steps I took for delegating the AD zones for example.com: 1) In the example.com zone on the BIND server I added

RE: [ActiveDir] AD DNS along with Bind

2006-05-23 Thread Freddy HARTONO
. Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 4:38 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD DNS along with Bind Adeel, Here is a response from our DNS guy. I hope it helps you. Mike Thommes = Here are the steps I took for delegating the AD

Re: [ActiveDir] AD DNS in Windows delegation to Novell DNS

2006-01-19 Thread Al Mulnick
You'll be happy to hear you wouldn't recognize it as your father's Novell, so to speak. It's a linux/novell hybrid now supposedly including 6.5 kernel and linux pieces blended together in a magical way that makes it better, shinier, faster etc. Groupwise is a nice front end to sendmail last I

RE: [ActiveDir] AD DNS in Windows delegation to Novell DNS

2006-01-18 Thread Gil Kirkpatrick
I'm not familiar with Novell's DNS implementation... I assume it is based on BIND? See http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/windowsserver2003/library/ServerHelp/73c0ae36-8058-43d1-8809-046eb03b73fb.mspxand

RE: [ActiveDir] AD DNS in Windows delegation to Novell DNS

2006-01-18 Thread David Adner
Unless Novell's changed what flavor of DNS/feature set they have since NetWare 5.1 (last time I ever saw Novell) it did not support dynamic updates. More specifically, it supported "dynamic updates" but only via a NetWare DHCP server. Also, at the time, the GUI for managing records didn't

RE: [ActiveDir] AD/DNS BPA?

2005-10-16 Thread Rick Kingslan
no rights or warranties ... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP] Sent: Saturday, October 15, 2005 1:32 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] AD/DNS BPA? Microsoft AD Health

RE: [ActiveDir] AD/DNS BPA?

2005-10-16 Thread Rick Kingslan
Murray Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 9:45 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD/DNS BPA? If find DNSlint to be pretty good, but obviously limited in scope. I think Dean mentioned to me recently that PSS have a tool that provides BPA-like functionality. It sounded like

RE: [ActiveDir] AD/DNS BPA?

2005-10-16 Thread joe
:05 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD/DNS BPA? Huh. That doesn't appear to be _US_ I wonder if the Engineering Services group knows that a third party (Partner at that) is advertising these services. Honestly, I didn't think that we farmed those services out

RE: [ActiveDir] AD/DNS BPA?

2005-10-16 Thread David Adner
, 2005 7:05 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD/DNS BPA? Huh. That doesn't appear to be _US_ I wonder if the Engineering Services group knows that a third party (Partner at that) is advertising these services. Honestly, I didn't think that we farmed

RE: [ActiveDir] AD/DNS BPA?

2005-10-16 Thread David Adner
Kingslan Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2005 7:11 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD/DNS BPA? Yes, they (we) do. I'll check into them and give you an overview of what they do If I can, to be more correct. Rick [msft] -- Posting is provided AS IS, and confers

RE: [ActiveDir] AD/DNS BPA?

2005-10-15 Thread Dean Wells
: [ActiveDir] AD/DNS BPA? Boo, hiss. It's Engineering Services that offers it, not MCS. ; -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dean Wells Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 11:22 AM To: Send - AD mailing list Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD/DNS

Re: [ActiveDir] AD/DNS BPA?

2005-10-15 Thread Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Adner Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 10:44 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD/DNS BPA? Boo, hiss. It's Engineering Services that offers it, not MCS. ; -Original

RE: [ActiveDir] AD/DNS BPA?

2005-10-14 Thread David Adner
Boo, hiss. It's Engineering Services that offers it, not MCS. ; -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dean Wells Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 11:22 AM To: Send - AD mailing list Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD/DNS BPA? The tool I

RE: [ActiveDir] AD/DNS BPA?

2005-10-13 Thread Dean Wells
] On Behalf Of Tony Murray Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 7:45 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD/DNS BPA? If find DNSlint to be pretty good, but obviously limited in scope. I think Dean mentioned to me recently that PSS have a tool that provides BPA-like

RE: [ActiveDir] AD/DNS BPA?

2005-10-13 Thread Free, Bob
transfer alone. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dean Wells Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 9:22 AM To: Send - AD mailing list Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD/DNS BPA? The tool I spoke about in confidence with Tony (just teasing ;o

RE: [ActiveDir] AD/DNS BPA?

2005-10-12 Thread neil.ruston
I can see a need for a BPA for AD but also a tool which can go out and discover an AD and report back on all of its nuances in detail (maybe this would be one utility, offering both of the above features). I'm still waiting for a good AD/DC stress test tool to emerge too... neil -Original

RE: [ActiveDir] AD/DNS BPA?

2005-10-11 Thread Al Mulnick
The tools are there, but the interpretation is sometimes lacking G I've been told that several companies are currently offering health checks, but I haven't tested any of them. As for Microsoft tools, I'm a fan of using dcdiag and netdiag right after scanning the event logs. That'll give me

RE: [ActiveDir] AD/DNS BPA?

2005-10-11 Thread Tony Murray
on this (assuming it's not under NDA)? Tony -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Al Mulnick Sent: Wednesday, 12 October 2005 2:58 p.m. To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD/DNS BPA? The tools are there, but the interpretation

RE: [ActiveDir] AD DNS

2004-06-22 Thread Mulnick, Al
Title: AD, GPO and Technet Wouldn't it just be easier to transfer the zone to the new Active Directory zone and work it in slowly to ensure the quality you need? Al From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Puetz, ChristophSent: Tuesday, June 22, 2004 12:39 PMTo:

RE: [ActiveDir] AD DNS

2004-06-22 Thread Brian Desmond
I would have setup the AD zone as a secondary to the Cisco, and then converted it to a primary ad integrated after the txfr. Given that that's not an option, I think that you could still take one of your AD DNS servers, remove the AD zone from it, create a secondary to the Cisco, txfr the zone,

RE: [ActiveDir] AD DNS

2004-06-22 Thread Puetz, Christoph
] On Behalf Of Brian DesmondSent: Tuesday, June 22, 2004 2:22 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD DNS I would have setup the AD zone as a secondary to the Cisco, and then converted it to a primary ad integrated after the txfr. Given that that's not an option, I think that you could still

RE: [ActiveDir] AD DNS Question

2004-06-17 Thread Passo, Larry
: Wednesday, June 16, 2004 6:30 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD DNS Question Install the DNS server (DNS serverS, for redundancy). Create your zone as secondary on the new DNS server(S), specify your existing DNS server as the Primary Let zone Transfer happen. Convert the secondary zone

RE: [ActiveDir] AD DNS Question

2004-06-16 Thread deji
Install the DNS server (DNS serverS, for redundancy). Create your zone as secondary on the new DNS server(S), specify your existing DNS server as the Primary Let zone Transfer happen. Convert the secondary zone you created earlier to Primary (AD-Integrated, for good measure) Configure the Test

Re: [ActiveDir] AD DNS Question

2004-06-16 Thread Manjeet
Hi, Installating a Microsoft DNS will not effect your network. you can Install and configure DNS at any time through the Confiure your server through the administrative tools. Forget about any conflict, but stiil if you are not confident then you can configure the Srandard primary DNS first,

RE: [ActiveDir] AD DNS/DHCP issue/question

2003-07-17 Thread Roger Seielstad
: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD DNS/DHCP issue/question Check Microsoft KB article Q319202. I had this exact issue, that is why I went away from the 'secure updates only' setting. From: Salandra, Justin A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 2:10

RE: [ActiveDir] AD DNS/DHCP issue/question

2003-07-16 Thread Salandra, Justin A.
]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD DNS/DHCP issue/question That sounds like its properly configured, although I strongly suggest setting DNS for secured updates only. Routers won't cache DHCP info, either - they just forward it. You might want to look at the active leases to see what's happening

RE: [ActiveDir] AD DNS/DHCP issue/question

2003-07-16 Thread Roger Seielstad
Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message-From: Salandra, Justin A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 2:10 PMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD DNS/DHCP issue/question What won't get registered in DNS if the zone is set to Secured

RE: [ActiveDir] AD DNS/DHCP issue/question

2003-07-16 Thread Wright, T. MR NSSB
if the zone is set to Secured Updates Only? Anything that does not have a object in the directory? -Original Message-From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 3:09 PMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD DNS/DHCP issue/question

RE: [ActiveDir] AD DNS/DHCP issue/question

2003-07-16 Thread Rick Kingslan
A.Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 1:10 PMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD DNS/DHCP issue/question What wont get registered in DNS if the zone is set to Secured Updates Only? Anything that does not have a object in the directory? -Original Message-From: Roger

Re: [ActiveDir] AD DNS/DHCP issue/question

2003-07-15 Thread jim . katoe
Force a ipconfig /registerdns after the name change. Wright, T. MR NSSB [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/15/2003 08:46 AM Please respond to ActiveDir To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: [ActiveDir] AD DNS/DHCP

RE: [ActiveDir] AD DNS/DHCP issue/question

2003-07-15 Thread Carr, Jonathan
You might want to run a post setup job to run ipconfig /registerdns -Original Message-From: Wright, T. MR NSSB [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 8:46 AMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: [ActiveDir] AD DNS/DHCP issue/question Gonna try and keep this

RE: [ActiveDir] AD DNS/DHCP issue/question

2003-07-15 Thread Wright, T. MR NSSB
I'm pretty sure that willwork... that was one of the aforementioned 'work arounds'. I was just curious why it wasn't updating itself as it does when I sit on the same network. Thanks for the ideas... -Tim From: Carr, Jonathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 10:08

RE: [ActiveDir] AD DNS/DHCP issue/question

2003-07-15 Thread Carr, Jonathan
-Original Message-From: Wright, T. MR NSSB [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 11:08 AMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD DNS/DHCP issue/question I'm pretty sure that willwork... that was one of the aforementioned 'work arounds'. I was just curious why

RE: [ActiveDir] AD DNS/DHCP issue/question

2003-07-15 Thread Wright, T. MR NSSB
Title: Message I can't speak for the network... I asked our network guy to change the IP-Helper address to point to the new DHCP server. He did that and I get my lease... Is there something else that I should ask him to look at? One thing I thought of is that it may be possible that there

RE: [ActiveDir] AD DNS/DHCP issue/question

2003-07-15 Thread Roger Seielstad
PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 12:36 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD DNS/DHCP issue/question W2k and xp update their own dns records but only when they renew their leases or get a different lease. Here is a different way of doing it. Shorten your leases

RE: [ActiveDir] AD DNS/DHCP issue/question

2003-07-15 Thread Wright, T. MR NSSB
ginal Message-From: Carr, Jonathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 12:36 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD DNS/DHCP issue/question W2k and xp update their own dns records but only when they renew their leases or get a different lease.

RE: [ActiveDir] AD DNS/DHCP issue/question

2003-07-15 Thread Roger Seielstad
. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message-From: Wright, T. MR NSSB [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 12:38 PMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD DNS/DHCP issue

RE: [ActiveDir] AD DNS: CNAME/Alias

2003-06-11 Thread Joe
Title: Message Forgive me if this comes through strange, I saw the post on the web archive and didn't see a way to respond through it so I just typed up a new message. Anyway, the SP3 reg entry is a good solution, if however you don't have a W2K SP3 then you can add the additional name to

RE: [ActiveDir] AD DNS: CNAME/Alias

2003-06-06 Thread David Mills
It is a known issue, but if you are running SP3 then you can set the reg key described in this article to resolve the issue: http://support.microsoft.com/?scid=kb;en-us;281308 - Dave -- Original Message -- From: Roger Seielstad [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [ActiveDir] AD, DNS, Errors - THE WORKS

2002-12-30 Thread Pelle, Joe
: RE: [ActiveDir] AD, DNS, Errors - THE WORKS Resend - last was bounced. No idea why Joe, Check Local Policy on each of the DCs. If any of these was an upgrade (and sometimes, not) of a member that was in a service position before becoming

RE: [ActiveDir] AD, DNS, Errors - THE WORKS

2002-12-30 Thread Gil Kirkpatrick
(ipconfig /flushdns). -gil -Original Message- From: Pelle, Joe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 10:39 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD, DNS, Errors - THE WORKS The DC gives me a permissions error when opening Domain Controller Security

RE: [ActiveDir] AD, DNS, Errors - THE WORKS

2002-12-30 Thread Pelle, Joe
consent. -Original Message- From: Gil Kirkpatrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 2:11 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD, DNS, Errors - THE WORKS Sounds like a DNS problem. The permissions message is a canard; the interesting point

RE: [ActiveDir] AD, DNS, Errors - THE WORKS

2002-12-27 Thread Rick Kingslan
- www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Pelle, Joe Sent: Monday, December 23, 2002 3:14 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD, DNS, Errors - THE WORKS Just like you say

RE: [ActiveDir] AD, DNS, Errors - THE WORKS

2002-12-23 Thread Roger Seielstad
Hmm. My first inclination is that your child domain's don't know about the empty root. How are the DNS configs done? Are they root.com, hq.root.com and plant.root.com, or is it a discontiguous namespace? If its contiguous, did you delegate both subdomains from the root? It smells of DNS issues,

RE: [ActiveDir] AD, DNS, Errors - THE WORKS

2002-12-23 Thread Pelle, Joe
and cleared the event logs waiting to see what happens. Still getting the same event log messages... Joe Pelle -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 23, 2002 2:42 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD, DNS

RE: [ActiveDir] AD, DNS, Errors - THE WORKS

2002-12-23 Thread Rick Kingslan
Title: Message Joe, Check Local Policy on each of the DCs. If any of these was an upgrade (and sometimes, not) of a member that was in a service position before becoming a DC, there are times when a program or application will get installed by a SID that doesn't exist after the machine