On Dec 30, 2008, at 11:45 AM, Steve Richfield wrote:
Bingo! You have to tailor the techniques to the problem - more
than just solving the equations, but often the representation of
quantities needs to be in some sort of multivalued form.
What I meant is that if the standard algebraic
On Jan 1, 2009, at 2:35 PM, J. Andrew Rogers wrote:
Since digital and analog are the same thing computationally
(digital is a subset of analog), and non-digital computers have
been generally superior for several decades, this is not relevant.
Gah, that should be *digital* computers have
entry of mine on hypercomputation and AGI into a
conference paper on the topic ... here is a rough draft, on which I'd
appreciate commentary from anyone who's knowledgeable on the subject:
http://goertzel.org/papers/CognitiveInformaticsHypercomputationPaper.pdf
This is a theoretical rather
J. Andrew,
On 1/1/09, J. Andrew Rogers and...@ceruleansystems.com wrote:
On Jan 1, 2009, at 2:35 PM, J. Andrew Rogers wrote:
Since digital and analog are the same thing computationally (digital
is a subset of analog), and non-digital computers have been generally
superior for several
On Dec 30, 2008, at 12:51 AM, Steve Richfield wrote:
On a side note, there is the clean math that people learn on their
way to a math PhD, and then there is the dirty math that governs
physical systems. Dirty math is fraught with all sorts of multi-
valued functions, fundamental
2008/12/29 Ben Goertzel b...@goertzel.org:
Hi,
I expanded a previous blog entry of mine on hypercomputation and AGI into a
conference paper on the topic ... here is a rough draft, on which I'd
appreciate commentary from anyone who's knowledgeable on the subject:
http://goertzel.org/papers
wil.pear...@gmail.comwrote:
2008/12/29 Ben Goertzel b...@goertzel.org:
Hi,
I expanded a previous blog entry of mine on hypercomputation and AGI into
a
conference paper on the topic ... here is a rough draft, on which I'd
appreciate commentary from anyone who's knowledgeable
2008/12/30 Ben Goertzel b...@goertzel.org:
It seems to come down to the simplicity measure... if you can have
simplicity(Turing program P that generates lookup table T)
simplicity(compressed lookup table T)
then the Turing program P can be considered part of a scientific
explanation...
I'm heading off on a vacation for 4-5 days [with occasional email access]
and will probably respond to this when i get back ... just wanted to let you
know I'm not ignoring the question ;-)
ben
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 1:26 PM, William Pearson wil.pear...@gmail.comwrote:
2008/12/30 Ben Goertzel
J. Andrew,
On 12/30/08, J. Andrew Rogers and...@ceruleansystems.com wrote:
On Dec 30, 2008, at 12:51 AM, Steve Richfield wrote:
On a side note, there is the clean math that people learn on their way
to a math PhD, and then there is the dirty math that governs physical
systems. Dirty math
Hi,
I expanded a previous blog entry of mine on hypercomputation and AGI into a
conference paper on the topic ... here is a rough draft, on which I'd
appreciate commentary from anyone who's knowledgeable on the subject:
http://goertzel.org/papers/CognitiveInformaticsHypercomputationPaper.pdf
On Dec 29, 2008, at 10:45 AM, Ben Goertzel wrote:
I expanded a previous blog entry of mine on hypercomputation and AGI
into a conference paper on the topic ... here is a rough draft, on
which I'd appreciate commentary from anyone who's knowledgeable on
the subject:
http://goertzel.org
...
-- ben g
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 4:18 PM, J. Andrew Rogers
and...@ceruleansystems.com wrote:
On Dec 29, 2008, at 10:45 AM, Ben Goertzel wrote:
I expanded a previous blog entry of mine on hypercomputation and AGI into
a conference paper on the topic ... here is a rough draft, on which I'd
On Dec 29, 2008, at 1:22 PM, Ben Goertzel wrote:
Well, some of the papers in the references of my paper give formal
mathematical definitions of hypercomputation, though my paper is
brief and conceptual and not of that nature. So although the
generic concept may be muddled, there are
14 matches
Mail list logo