A reminder to all in the San Fran Bay area ... a hands-on workshop on
OpenCog hosted by Ben Goertzel, Joel Pitt and David Hart will be held
Sunday. Details are here:
http://opencog.org/wiki/CogDev2008
There is no cost except your sanity.
-- Ben G
--
Ben Goertzel, PhD
CEO, Novamente LLC
Hi...
About OCP and Eliezer ...
This is another topic that was bound to come up!
OpenCogPrime is the design and approach of myself and a number of my
colleagues ... but it's not Eliezer's design or approach
Eliezer and I have many points of agreement, many points of disagreement,
and many
David Hart wrote:
On 8/2/08, *Richard Loosemore* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thus: in my paper there is a quote from a book in which Conway's
efforts were described, and it is transparently clear from this
quote that the method Conway used was random search:
Ben,
Thanks for the large amount of work that must have gone into the production of
the wikibook. Along with the upcoming PLN book (now scheduled for Sept 26
according to Amazon) and re-reading The Hidden Pattern, there should be enough
material for a diligent student to grok your approach.
: Friday, August 01, 2008 3:41 PM
Subject: **SPAM** RE: [agi] OpenCog Prime wikibook and roadmap posted
(moderately detailed design for an OpenCog-based thinking machine)
Ben,
Thanks for the large amount of work that must have gone into the production
of the wikibook. Along
On 8/2/08, Richard Loosemore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thus: in my paper there is a quote from a book in which Conway's efforts
were described, and it is transparently clear from this quote that the
method Conway used was random search:
I believe this statement misinterprets the quote and
Hi all,
I just sent the following email to the OpenCog email list (
[EMAIL PROTECTED]).
To avoid replicated discussion, I'd like to do any serious, detail
scientific/technical discussion of OpenCog Prime on the OpenCog email list.
So if you want to talk about OpenCogPrime in detail, please sign
Mike Dougherty wrote:
On Dec 28, 2007 1:55 PM, Richard Loosemore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mike Dougherty wrote:
On Dec 28, 2007 8:28 AM, Richard Loosemore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, that would be a serious miusunderstanding of the framework and
development environment that I am
On 12/28/07, Jean-Paul Van Belle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IMHO more important than working towards contributing clean code would be
to *publish the (required) interfaces for the modules as well as give
standards for/details on the knowledge representation format*. I am sure
that you have those
On Dec 28, 2007 4:17 AM, Ed Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Richard,
You are entitled to your reservations about OpenCog, but others, like me,
are entitled to our enthusiasms about it.
You are correct that OpenCog starts with a certain approach, but I think it
is an approach that has a lot
OpenCog is definitely a positive thing to happen in the AGI scene. It's
been all vaporware so far.
I wonder what would be the level of participation?
Also I think it's going to increase the chance of a safe takeoff, by
exposing users and developers gradually to AGI. But we also need to have
Benjamin Goertzel wrote:
I wish you much luck with your own approach And, I would imagine
that if you create a software framework supporting your own approach
in a convenient way, my own currently favored AI approaches will not
be conveniently explorable within it. That's the nature of
On Dec 28, 2007 5:59 AM, YKY (Yan King Yin)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OpenCog is definitely a positive thing to happen in the AGI scene. It's
been all vaporware so far.
Yes, it's all vaporware so far ;-)
On the other hand, the code we hope to release as part of OpenCog actually
exists, but
On Dec 28, 2007 8:28 AM, Richard Loosemore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, that would be a serious miusunderstanding of the framework and
development environment that I am building. Your system would be just
as easy to build as any other.
... considering the proliferation of AGI
IMHO more important than working towards contributing clean code would be to
*publish the (required) interfaces for the modules as well as give standards
for/details on the knowledge representation format*. I am sure that you have
those spread over various internal and published documents
On Dec 28, 2007 8:28 AM, Richard Loosemore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Benjamin Goertzel wrote:
I wish you much luck with your own approach And, I would imagine
that if you create a software framework supporting your own approach
in a convenient way, my own currently favored AI
http://gbbopen.org/
- Message d'origine
De : Benjamin Goertzel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
À : agi@v2.listbox.com
Envoyé le : Vendredi, 28 Décembre 2007, 15h14mn 10s
Objet : Re: [agi] OpenCog
On Dec 28, 2007 8:28 AM, Richard Loosemore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Benjamin Goertzel wrote:
I wish
Benjamin Goertzel wrote:
On Dec 28, 2007 8:28 AM, Richard Loosemore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Benjamin Goertzel wrote:
I wish you much luck with your own approach And, I would imagine
that if you create a software framework supporting your own approach
in a convenient way, my own
Mike Dougherty wrote:
On Dec 28, 2007 8:28 AM, Richard Loosemore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, that would be a serious miusunderstanding of the framework and
development environment that I am building. Your system would be just
as easy to build as any other.
... considering the
On Dec 28, 2007 1:55 PM, Richard Loosemore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mike Dougherty wrote:
On Dec 28, 2007 8:28 AM, Richard Loosemore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, that would be a serious miusunderstanding of the framework and
development environment that I am building. Your system
Ed Porter wrote:
OpenCog: A Software Framework for Integrative Artificial General
Intelligence by Dave Hart and Ben Goertzel says
Contingent upon funding for OpenCog proceeding as planned, we are
targeting 1H08 for our first official code release, to be accompanied by
a full complement of
To: agi@v2.listbox.com
Subject: [agi] OpenCog
Ed Porter wrote:
OpenCog: A Software Framework for Integrative Artificial General
Intelligence by Dave Hart and Ben Goertzel says
Contingent upon funding for OpenCog proceeding as planned, we are
targeting 1H08 for our first official code release
Loosemore wrote:
I am sorry, but I have reservations about the OpenCog project.
The problem of building an open-source AI needs a framework-level tool
that is specifically designed to allow a wide variety of architectures
to be described and expressed.
OpenCog, as far as I can see, does not
Re the recent discussion of OpenCog -- this recent post I made
to the OpenCog mailing list may perhaps help clarify the
intentions underlying the project further.
-- Ben
-- Forwarded message --
From: Benjamin Goertzel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Dec 27, 2007 11:07 AM
Subject: Re:
24 matches
Mail list logo
