Richard
Dismissal as gibberish is one of the oldest and cheapest rhetorical tricks in
History and the signpost of a feeble mind.
I would save a mention of you in my memoirs, but that would still be far too
generous ...
JLM
^
John,
You make a mistake
- Original Message -
From: Harvey Newstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: agi@v2.listbox.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2008 9:18 PM
Subject: Fw: [agi] US PATENT ISSUED for the TEN ETHICAL LAWS OF ROBOTICS
John LaMuth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote,
There is nothing at all spam-like about publicizing a
John LaMuth wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Harvey Newstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: agi@v2.listbox.com mailto:agi@v2.listbox.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2008 9:18 PM
Subject: Fw: [agi] US PATENT ISSUED for the TEN ETHICAL LAWS OF ROBOTICS
John LaMuth
Google Glory/Prudence Providence/Faith Grace/Beauty Tranquility/Ecstasy to
see about a hundred of these postings spammed all over the Internet since
2001. They are always the same stuff rebranded as a new unified theory for
psychology, spirituality, classifying emotions, decoding mental illness,
http://www.angelfire.com/rnb/fairhaven/behaviorism.html
http://www.forebrain.org
#
- Original Message -
From: Harvey Newstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: agi@v2.listbox.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2008 12:32 AM
Subject: Re: [agi] US PATENT ISSUED
2008/7/22 Mike Archbold [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
It looks to me to be borrowed from Aristotle's ethics. Back in my college
days, I was trying to explain my project and the professor kept
interrupting me to ask: What does it do? Tell me what it does. I don't
understand what your system does.
Will:
Mike Archbold [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
It looks to me to be borrowed from Aristotle's ethics. Back in my
college
days, I was trying to explain my project and the professor kept
interrupting me to ask: What does it do? Tell me what it does. I don't
understand what your system does. What
2008/7/22 Mike Archbold [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
It looks to me to be borrowed from Aristotle's ethics. Back in my
college
days, I was trying to explain my project and the professor kept
interrupting me to ask: What does it do? Tell me what it does. I
don't
understand what your system does.
://www.forebrain.org
- Original Message -
From: Matt Mahoney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: agi@v2.listbox.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 8:02 AM
Subject: Re: [agi] US PATENT ISSUED for the TEN ETHICAL LAWS OF ROBOTICS
--- On Tue, 7/22/08, John LaMuth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Assuming I'm
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 11:22 AM, Jan Klauck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Opinions ?
Can your (ethical) AI read the content of the
following link, translate it conceptually from
physics to AI and give us a friendly answer
(including a score)?
http://www.math.ucr.edu/home/baez/crackpot.html
http://www.forebrain.org
http://www.charactervalues.com
http://www.charactervalues.org
http://www.charactervalues.net
- Original Message - From: Brad Paulsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: agi@v2.listbox.com
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2008 12:35 PM
Subject: Re: [agi] US PATENT ISSUED for the TEN ETHICAL
* From: Brad Paulsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* To: agi@v2.listbox.com
* Subject: Re: [agi] US PATENT ISSUED for the TEN ETHICAL LAWS OF
ROBOTICS
* Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 19:37:16 -0500
Mr. LaMuth,
You are correct, sir. I should not have
---
Dude... Get a life.
I mean that in the friendliest way possible, but honestly. Get a life.
Jim Bromer
* *From:* Brad Paulsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* *To:* agi@v2.listbox.com
* *Subject:* Re: [agi] US PATENT ISSUED
prove instrumental towards commercial
licensure.
Gratefully
John LaMuth
www.emotionchip.net
- Original Message -
From: Brad Paulsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: agi@v2.listbox.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 5:37 PM
Subject: Re: [agi] US PATENT ISSUED for the TEN ETHICAL LAWS OF ROBOTICS
2008/7/21 John LaMuth [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Announcing the recently issued U.S. patent concerning ethical artificial
intelligence titled: Inductive Inference Affective Language Analyzer
Simulating AI.
This just show what a farce the US patent system has become.
Perhaps like Bob, I'm not sure whether this isn't a leg-pull. But, to take it
seriously, how do you propose to give your robot free will - especially
considering that the vast majority of AI/AGI-ers roboticists are still
committed to an algorithmic paradigm which both excludes free will and
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 12:59 PM, Matt Mahoney wrote:
This is a real patent, unfortunately...
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect2=PTO1Sect2=HITOFFp=1u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.htmlr=1f=Gl=50d=PALLRefSrch=yesQuery=PN%2F6587846
But I think it will expire before anyone has the
2008/7/21 Matt Mahoney [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This is a real patent, unfortunately...
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect2=PTO1Sect2=HITOFFp=1u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.htmlr=1f=Gl=50d=PALLRefSrch=yesQuery=PN%2F6587846
But I think it will expire before anyone has the technology
BillK: I prefer Warren Ellis's angry, profane Three Laws of Robotics.
(linked from BoingBoing)
http://www.warrenellis.com/?p=5426
Actually, while I take Ellis' point as in
1...what are you thinking? Ooh, I must protect the bag of meat at all
costs because I couldn't possibly plug in the
Seems like this is getting to be a regualr event on the AGI, or other
singularity-related lists: about once a year or so some crackpot
announces that they have filed a patent for a complete thinking machine,
or a robot-ethics system or some other garbage.
The other crackpot announcement we
20 matches
Mail list logo
