2008/6/26 Steve Richfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Perhaps we can completely sidestep the countless contentious issues
regarding what intelligence is, what an AGI is, what consciousness is, what
is needed, etc., with an entirely different approach:
It's the usual pattern for participants on AI
Jim Bromer wrote:
- Original Message
From: Richard Loosemore Jim,
I'm sorry: I cannot make any sense of what you say here.
I don't think you are understanding the technicalities of the argument I
am presenting, because your very first sentence... But we can invent a
'mathematics'
Steve Richfield wrote:
To all,
Perhaps we can completely sidestep the countless contentious issues
regarding what intelligence is, what an AGI is, what consciousness is, what
is needed, etc., with an entirely different approach:
Perhaps we could create a short database (maybe only a dozen or
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 6:12 AM, Steve Richfield
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps we could create a short database (maybe only a dozen or so entries)
of sample queries, activities, tasks, etc., that YOU would like to see YOUR
future AGIs performing to earn their electricity.
The approach I
2008/6/26 Steve Richfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Jiri previously noted that perhaps AGIs would best be used to manage the
affairs of humans so that we can do as we please without bothering with the
complex details of life. Of course, people and some (communist) governments
now already perform
Ah, so you do not accept AIXI either.
Put this way, your complex system dilemma applies only to pure AGI,
and not to any narrow AI attempts, no matter how ambitious. But I
suppose other, totally different reasons (such as P != NP, if so) can
block those.
Is this the best way to understand your
Russell and William,
OK, I think that I am finally beginning to get it. No one here is really
planning to do wonderful things that people can't reasonably do, though
Russell has pointed out some improvements which I will comment on
separately.
I am interested in things that people can NOT
