On 6/5/07, William Pearson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 04/06/07, Matt Mahoney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Suppose you build a human level AGI, and argue
that it is not autonomous no matter what it does, because it is
deterministically executing a program.
I suspect an AGI that executes one
Wow. You've floored me given that indexes are key to what enterprise DBs do
well. What are the special requirements/functionalities of the indices that
you believe that enterprise DBs are not *optimized* to handle?
Is there any AGI project which uses so called enterprise DBs
intensively? If
On 2/18/07, Charles D Hixson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You might check out D ( http://www.digitalmars.com/d/index.html ). Mind
you, it's still in the quite early days, and missing a lot of libraries
... which means you need to construct interfaces to the C versions.
Still, it answers several of
The idea is a language that looks a lot more like the signals-and-systems
mindset of cybernetics than the logic-based one of McCarthy and early AI.
As I've pointed out before in this venue, AGI is a hard enough task that
it
makes sense to do some serious work on tools-to-build-the-tools. As
Judging from your posts, you have solved the AI problem in 2007, 2006,
2005,
On 1/15/07, A. T. Murray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt Mahoney wrote:
[...] Lenat briefly mentions
Sergey's (one of Google's founders) goal of solving AI by 2020.
FWIW I solved AI theory-wise in 1979 and
On 12/13/06, Philip Goetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/5/06, BillK [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is a little annoying that he doesn't mention Damasio at all, when
Damasio has been pushing this same thesis for nearly 20 years, and
even popularized it in Descartes' Error.
(Disclaimer: I didn't
But NP-hard is still very, very trivial; there's very little that falls into
that category. Basically there are four important categories of problem:
1) NP-hard
2) EXPTIME-hard
3) Incomputable
4) Ill-posed problem
Intelligence is primarily in category 4 (which is Richard's point, if I
if not impossible
to port Mind.Forth into circa 1982 Sinclair Spectrum BASIC.
Why, because of memory issues?
Sarcastic regards,
Ricardo Barreira
---
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
More importantly, do you have any prinicipled reason for claiming that
it will soon be able to handle any of these things, other than your
statement of optimism If robot builders were to add sensory and motor
routines to Mind.Forth, the AI would flesh out its conceptual knowledge
and interact
