Richard
Dismissal as gibberish is one of the oldest and cheapest rhetorical tricks in
History and the signpost of a feeble mind.
I would save a mention of you in my memoirs, but that would still be far too
generous ...
JLM
^
John,
You make a mistake
- Original Message -
From: Harvey Newstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: agi@v2.listbox.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2008 9:18 PM
Subject: Fw: [agi] US PATENT ISSUED for the TEN ETHICAL LAWS OF ROBOTICS
John LaMuth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote,
There is nothing at all spam-like about publicizing
John LaMuth wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Harvey Newstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: agi@v2.listbox.com mailto:agi@v2.listbox.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2008 9:18 PM
Subject: Fw: [agi] US PATENT ISSUED for the TEN ETHICAL LAWS OF ROBOTICS
John LaMuth
Google Glory/Prudence Providence/Faith Grace/Beauty Tranquility/Ecstasy to
see about a hundred of these postings spammed all over the Internet since
2001. They are always the same stuff rebranded as a new unified theory for
psychology, spirituality, classifying emotions, decoding mental illness,
http://www.angelfire.com/rnb/fairhaven/behaviorism.html
http://www.forebrain.org
#
- Original Message -
From: Harvey Newstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: agi@v2.listbox.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2008 12:32 AM
Subject: Re: [agi] US PATENT ISSUED
John LaMuth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote,
There is nothing at all spam-like about publicizing a new and worthy
addition to global knowledge and harmony.
Publicize it on your own websites. People can find it if they want. You
don't have to repeatedly post the same stuff over and over to a bunch
2008/7/22 Mike Archbold [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
It looks to me to be borrowed from Aristotle's ethics. Back in my college
days, I was trying to explain my project and the professor kept
interrupting me to ask: What does it do? Tell me what it does. I don't
understand what your system does.
Will:
Mike Archbold [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
It looks to me to be borrowed from Aristotle's ethics. Back in my
college
days, I was trying to explain my project and the professor kept
interrupting me to ask: What does it do? Tell me what it does. I don't
understand what your system does. What
2008/7/22 Mike Archbold [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
It looks to me to be borrowed from Aristotle's ethics. Back in my
college
days, I was trying to explain my project and the professor kept
interrupting me to ask: What does it do? Tell me what it does. I
don't
understand what your system does.
://www.forebrain.org
- Original Message -
From: Matt Mahoney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: agi@v2.listbox.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 8:02 AM
Subject: Re: [agi] US PATENT ISSUED for the TEN ETHICAL LAWS OF ROBOTICS
--- On Tue, 7/22/08, John LaMuth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Assuming I'm
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 11:22 AM, Jan Klauck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Opinions ?
Can your (ethical) AI read the content of the
following link, translate it conceptually from
physics to AI and give us a friendly answer
(including a score)?
http://www.math.ucr.edu/home/baez/crackpot.html
http://www.forebrain.org
http://www.charactervalues.com
http://www.charactervalues.org
http://www.charactervalues.net
- Original Message - From: Brad Paulsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: agi@v2.listbox.com
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2008 12:35 PM
Subject: Re: [agi] US PATENT ISSUED for the TEN ETHICAL
* From: Brad Paulsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* To: agi@v2.listbox.com
* Subject: Re: [agi] US PATENT ISSUED for the TEN ETHICAL LAWS OF
ROBOTICS
* Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 19:37:16 -0500
Mr. LaMuth,
You are correct, sir. I should not have
---
Dude... Get a life.
I mean that in the friendliest way possible, but honestly. Get a life.
Jim Bromer
* *From:* Brad Paulsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* *To:* agi@v2.listbox.com
* *Subject:* Re: [agi] US PATENT ISSUED
prove instrumental towards commercial
licensure.
Gratefully
John LaMuth
www.emotionchip.net
- Original Message -
From: Brad Paulsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: agi@v2.listbox.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 5:37 PM
Subject: Re: [agi] US PATENT ISSUED for the TEN ETHICAL LAWS OF ROBOTICS
2008/7/21 John LaMuth [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Announcing the recently issued U.S. patent concerning ethical artificial
intelligence titled: Inductive Inference Affective Language Analyzer
Simulating AI.
This just show what a farce the US patent system has become.
Perhaps like Bob, I'm not sure whether this isn't a leg-pull. But, to take it
seriously, how do you propose to give your robot free will - especially
considering that the vast majority of AI/AGI-ers roboticists are still
committed to an algorithmic paradigm which both excludes free will and
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 12:59 PM, Matt Mahoney wrote:
This is a real patent, unfortunately...
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect2=PTO1Sect2=HITOFFp=1u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.htmlr=1f=Gl=50d=PALLRefSrch=yesQuery=PN%2F6587846
But I think it will expire before anyone has the
2008/7/21 Matt Mahoney [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This is a real patent, unfortunately...
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect2=PTO1Sect2=HITOFFp=1u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.htmlr=1f=Gl=50d=PALLRefSrch=yesQuery=PN%2F6587846
But I think it will expire before anyone has the technology
BillK: I prefer Warren Ellis's angry, profane Three Laws of Robotics.
(linked from BoingBoing)
http://www.warrenellis.com/?p=5426
Actually, while I take Ellis' point as in
1...what are you thinking? Ooh, I must protect the bag of meat at all
costs because I couldn't possibly plug in the
Seems like this is getting to be a regualr event on the AGI, or other
singularity-related lists: about once a year or so some crackpot
announces that they have filed a patent for a complete thinking machine,
or a robot-ethics system or some other garbage.
The other crackpot announcement we
21 matches
Mail list logo
