On 11/18/2012 05:38 AM, Carsten Schinzer wrote:
Hello again and thanks.
ant target works, the different jarfile does in principle as well, would
need the full cp though incuding the reference to commons-codec library.
I got my stuff and will continue working my way through to make my
On 11/16/2012 05:40 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Very well summed up, Paul
Thanks
Jacques
From: madppiper p...@ilscipio.com
@jacopo: That sounds like a terrific idea of yours! I have to read up on
[Proposal], but from your outline here, i would say it is a more sincere
step.
On 11/15/2012 10:54 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
This is now completed at rev. 1409880
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBADMIN/OFBiz+Attic
Jacopo
On Jul 26, 2012, at 8:09 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
... the removal will be documented, as usual, in the Attic page:
On 11/15/2012 11:49 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
4: Start filing issue trees in jira for pure upstream work. This
would include things like removing embedded libraries(maybe a
post-download kinda thing).
(responding to myself).
Debian-policy says that any upload to main(and therefore is DFSG),
must
On 11/06/2012 11:10 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 02:26:20PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 04:21:56PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
On 11/02/2012 04:19 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
I still don't understand. Why would an existing script call ovs-vsctl
with --may-exist
On 11/06/2012 11:10 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 02:26:20PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 04:21:56PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
On 11/02/2012 04:19 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
I still don't understand. Why would an existing script call ovs-vsctl
with --may-exist
On 11/02/2012 12:49 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 03:03:13PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
On 10/29/2012 11:34 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
Until now, a command like ovs-vsctl --may-exist add-br br0 yielded a
confusing error message. Users had to realize that the correct form was
ovs-vsctl
On 11/02/2012 04:19 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
I still don't understand. Why would an existing script call ovs-vsctl
with --may-exist as a global option? The call would not do anything
useful, because it would exit with a fatal error every time. Taking
this argument to its logical conclusion, one
On 11/02/2012 12:49 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 03:03:13PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
On 10/29/2012 11:34 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
Until now, a command like ovs-vsctl --may-exist add-br br0 yielded a
confusing error message. Users had to realize that the correct form was
ovs-vsctl
On 11/02/2012 04:19 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
I still don't understand. Why would an existing script call ovs-vsctl
with --may-exist as a global option? The call would not do anything
useful, because it would exit with a fatal error every time. Taking
this argument to its logical conclusion, one
: 691...@bugs.debian.org
Reported-by: Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com
Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff b...@nicira.com
---
AUTHORS |1 +
tests/ovs-vsctl.at | 13 -
utilities/ovs-vsctl.8.in | 11 ++--
utilities/ovs-vsctl.c| 131
: 691...@bugs.debian.org
Reported-by: Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com
Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff b...@nicira.com
---
AUTHORS |1 +
tests/ovs-vsctl.at | 13 -
utilities/ovs-vsctl.8.in | 11 ++--
utilities/ovs-vsctl.c| 131
Package: openvswitch-switch
Version: 1.4.2+git20120612-9
From the man page:
[--may-exist] add-br bridge
[--may-exist] add-br bridge parent vlan
[--may-exist] add-port bridge port [column[:key]=value]...
[--if-exists] del-port [bridge] port
From my script:
++
On 10/26/2012 11:43 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
[snip]
Right you are, mea-culpa. You're right that there is an example in
the manpage, showing exactly what I want. Sorry for the noise, and
thanks for the fast response.
___
dev mailing list
On 10/26/2012 01:11 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 01:00:32PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
On 10/26/2012 11:43 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
[snip]
Right you are, mea-culpa. You're right that there is an example in
the manpage, showing exactly what I want. Sorry for the noise
Package: openvswitch-switch
Version: 1.4.2+git20120612-9
From the man page:
[--may-exist] add-br bridge
[--may-exist] add-br bridge parent vlan
[--may-exist] add-port bridge port [column[:key]=value]...
[--if-exists] del-port [bridge] port
From my script:
++
On 10/26/2012 11:43 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
[snip]
Right you are, mea-culpa. You're right that there is an example in
the manpage, showing exactly what I want. Sorry for the noise, and
thanks for the fast response.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
On 10/26/2012 01:11 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 01:00:32PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
On 10/26/2012 11:43 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
[snip]
Right you are, mea-culpa. You're right that there is an example in
the manpage, showing exactly what I want. Sorry for the noise
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1151?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13472521#comment-13472521
]
Adam Heath commented on OFBIZ-1151:
---
Technically, *any* hard-coded value, even hashed
Doesn't look like it, the issue is still just confirmed:
http://code.google.com/p/gmaps-api-issues/issues/detail?id=4046
On Tuesday, August 14, 2012 7:28:47 PM UTC+8, dragos wrote:
Hi William,
Any luck in solving this issue?
Thank you
On Monday, May 23, 2011 12:06:30 AM UTC-4, William
On 06/05/2012 02:35 AM, hans...@apache.org wrote:
Author: hansbak
Date: Tue Jun 5 07:35:26 2012
New Revision: 1346269
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1346269view=rev
Log:
enable tenant demo data
Modified:
ofbiz/trunk/framework/entity/ofbiz-component.xml
Modified:
On 06/03/2012 07:47 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
For https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4882 I stumbled upon
this with OOTB setting for ScriptUtil
exception report
--
Error running script at location
On 06/03/2012 07:08 AM, jler...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jleroux
Date: Sun Jun 3 12:08:00 2012
New Revision: 1345660
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1345660view=rev
Log:
Fixes QuickAdd screen rendering exception in ecommerce
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4882
It was only
On 06/03/2012 07:20 AM, jler...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jleroux
Date: Sun Jun 3 12:20:48 2012
New Revision: 1345661
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1345661view=rev
Log:
Revert r1345660, I was caught by the cache I thought it was only that when
another change I put before was also
On 06/03/2012 02:52 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
From: Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com
On 06/03/2012 07:20 AM, jler...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jleroux
Date: Sun Jun 3 12:20:48 2012
New Revision: 1345661
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1345661view=rev
Log:
Revert r1345660, I was caught
On 06/03/2012 03:45 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
From: Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com
On 06/03/2012 02:52 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
From: Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com
On 06/03/2012 07:20 AM, jler...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jleroux
Date: Sun Jun 3 12:20:48 2012
New Revision: 1345661
URL
On 06/03/2012 04:48 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
I am unable to reproduce that error.
Someone didn't do a clean, which mean their build/lib/foo.jar wasn't
rebuilt, so it had an older META-INF/services that referenced a class
that had been removed.
Or something like that.
-Adrian
On 6/3/2012
On 06/03/2012 04:51 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
This commit is one of many similar commits that have been made over the
last three months. There was a Mini-language overhaul discussion on the
dev mailing list.
Sure, I know there was a discussion. But 2 years from now, when someone
is looking at
On 06/02/2012 11:51 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Hi Adam,
I don't know what others think about that, but personnally I don't like
it. For instance we get now from beginning of the line
(trailers blanks included)
The terminal on my laptop is 198 chars. At work it's 147. But that
doesn't
On 06/02/2012 01:06 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
On Jun 2, 2012, at 7:15 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
There is no way that we can ever enforce a single, unified width. Screen sizes
change, font sizes change. It's too political to come up with a solution.
So, the only fallback is to never split
On 06/02/2012 01:14 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
On Jun 2, 2012, at 8:10 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
In the commit you commented on,
Oh no, it was Jacques not me :-)
Jacopo
No, really, I don't get you two confused. I just wasn't paying
attention. I've only had half a cup of coffee today.
On 06/01/2012 01:53 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
On May 31, 2012, at 6:10 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
Component/TenantComponent entities are defined in framework/entity.
However, that code does not use them. entityext does. They should be
moved to the later component.
+1
I've currently got
On 06/01/2012 12:42 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
On Jun 1, 2012, at 6:44 AM, Scott Gray wrote:
The only problem there would be that the information would need to be known
when the record was created since fromDate forms part of the primary key. It's
entirely possible that the user could
On 06/01/2012 04:27 AM, Jacopo Cappellato (JIRA) wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4916?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13287291#comment-13287291
]
Jacopo Cappellato commented on OFBIZ-4916:
On 06/01/2012 10:20 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
On Jun 1, 2012, at 4:59 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
entity depends on geronimo and entityext components, because of defaults in the
code and entityengine.xml. entityext depends on service.
as a side note: I am currently working
On 06/01/2012 10:52 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 06/01/2012 10:20 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
On Jun 1, 2012, at 4:59 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
entity depends on geronimo and entityext components, because of
defaults in the code and entityengine.xml. entityext depends on service.
as a side note
On 06/01/2012 11:52 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
On Jun 1, 2012, at 6:48 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
On Jun 1, 2012, at 5:52 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
What is different about the new implementation? Or what problems are you
trying to solve?
I am in a rush now, I am sorry but I will share
On 06/01/2012 11:48 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
On Jun 1, 2012, at 5:52 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
What is different about the new implementation? Or what problems are you
trying to solve?
I am in a rush now, I am sorry but I will share details about what I am trying
to do and why
On 06/01/2012 12:16 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
On 6/1/2012 4:55 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 06/01/2012 10:52 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 06/01/2012 10:20 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
On Jun 1, 2012, at 4:59 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
entity depends on geronimo and entityext components, because
On 06/01/2012 12:29 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
On 6/1/2012 6:42 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
On Jun 1, 2012, at 6:44 AM, Scott Gray wrote:
The only problem there would be that the information would need to be
known when the record was created since fromDate forms part of the
primary key. It's
On 06/01/2012 05:32 PM, jler...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jleroux
Date: Fri Jun 1 22:32:57 2012
New Revision: 1345379
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1345379view=rev
Log:
A patch from Tri Duc Vo for Next Vietnamese Ofbiz translation
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4759
On 06/01/2012 11:41 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
From: Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com
On 06/01/2012 05:32 PM, jler...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jleroux
Date: Fri Jun 1 22:32:57 2012
New Revision: 1345379
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1345379view=rev
Log:
A patch from Tri Duc Vo
Component/TenantComponent entities are defined in framework/entity.
However, that code does not use them. entityext does. They should be
moved to the later component.
I've currently got org.ofbiz.entity.Main that can load a delegator,
without any of service or any other component loaded. No
On 05/30/2012 02:46 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
On 5/29/2012 5:49 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 05/25/2012 01:22 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 05/25/2012 12:26 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
From: Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com
From: Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com
On 05/24/2012 04:05 PM, Jacques
On 05/30/2012 04:14 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Would you agree in adopting the following as a best practice for OFBiz
logging: do not include full maps/lists in the output or if really necessary
limit this to verbose output.
For example, avoid code like this:
On 05/30/2012 06:24 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
I am reposting this thread with a different subject to make sure
everyone interested has a chance to comment.
To summarize (and to make sure we are all on the same page):
1. Javolution was added to the project in the JDK 1.4 days. David
Jones ran
On 05/30/2012 04:14 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Would you agree in adopting the following as a best practice for OFBiz
logging: do not include full maps/lists in the output or if really necessary
limit this to verbose output.
For example, avoid code like this:
On 05/30/2012 11:47 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
On 5/30/2012 4:30 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 05/30/2012 02:46 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
On 5/29/2012 5:49 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 05/25/2012 01:22 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 05/25/2012 12:26 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
From: Jacques Le Rouxjacques.le.r
On 05/30/2012 12:22 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
I need to reacquaint myself with the entity engine code. I was
thinking the visitor pattern could be used to construct the SQL string
instead of the complicated if-then-else code spread across a number of
classes. We could use different visitors for
I noticed the 2 fields in the subject, but didn't actually recoginize
them(I've been using ofbiz for a *long* time). I did a big of
digging, and noticed that those fields were added to the model in
2006-05-04(1), and were first utilized when anonymous checkout was
added 2006-11-28(2). There has
On 05/27/2012 03:28 PM, jler...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jleroux
Date: Sun May 27 20:28:16 2012
New Revision: 1343088
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1343088view=rev
Log:
Fixes this error found by chance in log
exception report
On 05/28/2012 10:55 PM, doo...@apache.org wrote:
Author: doogie
Date: Tue May 29 03:55:05 2012
New Revision: 1343469
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1343469view=rev
Log:
FIX: This is the correct fix for 1343088;
TransactionUtil.doNewTransaction was starting a new transaction, then
On 05/25/2012 01:22 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 05/25/2012 12:26 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
From: Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com
From: Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com
On 05/24/2012 04:05 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
From: Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com
On 05/24/2012 10:18 AM, Adam
On 05/28/2012 11:48 PM, build...@apache.org wrote:
The Buildbot has detected a restored build on builder ofbiz-trunk while
building ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk/builds/3134
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this
On 05/27/2012 07:09 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
From: Adrian Crum adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com
FYI, in the Mini-language overhaul I interned the Element tag name
Strings.
Yes, that's really a good improvment! Things are much more clear now.
It's only in minilang though (I mean not in
On 05/25/2012 12:26 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
From: Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com
From: Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com
On 05/24/2012 04:05 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
From: Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com
On 05/24/2012 10:18 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
The idea was that you would
On 05/25/2012 10:58 AM, Pierre Smits wrote:
Please revert this commit. Not all documentation on website and wiki
reflect the new situation.
Keep the commit. Trunk doesn't have to be perfect all the time, it
*will* be broken, and will be inconsistent from time to time.
Fix the other locations.
On 05/24/2012 03:22 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
On May 24, 2012, at 9:04 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
From: Jacopo Cappellato jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com
On May 23, 2012, at 9:25 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 05/23/2012 01:13 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Using count() was simply a trick
On 05/24/2012 08:15 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
On 5/20/2012 10:01 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Quick questions (seems that there is a lack of internal
documentation to say the least), there are not only addressed to
Adam...
About javacc dependency do we really need it *OOTB*?
Can't we use rather
On 05/24/2012 10:18 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 05/24/2012 08:15 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
On 5/20/2012 10:01 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Quick questions (seems that there is a lack of internal
documentation to say the least), there are not only addressed to
Adam...
About javacc dependency do we
On 05/24/2012 04:05 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
From: Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com
On 05/24/2012 10:18 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 05/24/2012 08:15 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
On 5/20/2012 10:01 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Quick questions (seems that there is a lack of internal
documentation to say
And which ofbiz versions use commons/bzip2? Might have to check
catalina, jetty, etc.
On 05/23/2012 11:07 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
Original Message
Subject: [CVE-2012-2098] Apache Commons Compress and Apache Ant
denial of service vulnerability
Date: Wed, 23
On 05/23/2012 11:51 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
I just realized that line 150 in DBCPConnectionFactory:
factory.setValidationQuery(select example_type_id from example_type limit
1);
is a dependency on ExampleType entity declared in the example component.
This is probably not a big
On 05/23/2012 12:05 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
DBCPConnectionFactory is in framework/entity; having it require a
framework/entity/entitymodel seems the safest approach.
I agree; what if we use:
select count(testing_type_id) from testing_type where testing_type_id = 'ABC'
Actually, no,
On 05/23/2012 01:13 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Using count() was simply a trick to be sure to get a record back even if the
entity is empty... but if we use an entity that we are sure is populated we
don't have to use it, of course. Of course if we use count(*) we have to use
it in an
On 05/21/2012 10:47 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
From: Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com
On 05/21/2012 09:55 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Could not the asm library (not sure what it is exactly) be loaded on
the fly with Cobertura?
The less optional libs we have inside, the more we resolve with Ivy
On 05/17/2012 10:56 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Looks good to me, are you going to attach it to the ticket I have created in
the Freemarker bug tracker?
I'll do it; what's the other bug#? Do we want to bump the severity?
On 05/17/2012 10:57 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 05/17/2012 10:56 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Looks good to me, are you going to attach it to the ticket I have created in
the Freemarker bug tracker?
I'll do it; what's the other bug#? Do we want to bump the severity?
I'm just waiting
On 05/17/2012 11:48 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
wonderful
I can't seem to attach files to that issue, maybe because I didn't
originally file it. Could you see if you can attach both files?
If you can, but I can't, then the sf tracker is really stupid.
On 05/17/2012 11:50 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 05/17/2012 12:23 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
file are attached; that bug tracker is really awful.
This is all becoming very troubling.
== example methods
String a(String name, List list) {}
String a(String name, Map map) {}
String a(Object[] args
On 05/16/2012 11:30 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 05/16/2012 11:18 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 05/16/2012 11:05 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 05/16/2012 06:41 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
https://demo-trunk.ofbiz.apache.org/ordermgr/control/orderview?orderId=Demo1002
This may be a stupid question
provide the test
report XML file please?
-Adrian
On 5/12/2012 3:59 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 05/11/2012 05:25 AM, adri...@apache.org wrote:
Author: adrianc
Date: Fri May 11 10:25:33 2012
New Revision: 1337103
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1337103view=rev
Log:
Fixed broken Mini
On 05/12/2012 07:17 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
Okay, rev 1337518 gets the tests to pass, but it isn't a fix - it merely
masks the real problem. I made the commit so others can continue with
their work, and I will continue working on the real problem.
Without going into too much detail, here is a
On 05/12/2012 04:01 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
On May 10, 2012, at 6:23 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 05/10/2012 11:16 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
The scripts are helpful if you have a Subversion client that runs from
the command line. Some of us use a graphical Subversion client - like
Tortoise
On 05/12/2012 05:15 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
+1
Though I'd like to keep revert.bat, it's easier to change path (and not
forget) with new release than have to search in build.xml, not a big
deal though...
tools/ant-revert.xml:
./ant revert
./ant -f tools/ant-revert.xml revert
both commands
On 05/12/2012 03:36 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
I just meant it's easier to edit revert.bat than to seek for it in the
build.xml when you have to update the path for a new release. Forget it,
sometimes I'm too lazy :o)
I mean the definition for the ant revert command should be in a separate
On 05/12/2012 03:39 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
From: Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com
On 05/12/2012 04:01 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
On May 10, 2012, at 6:23 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 05/10/2012 11:16 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
The scripts are helpful if you have a Subversion client that runs
On 05/12/2012 04:04 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
From: Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com
On 05/12/2012 03:36 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
I just meant it's easier to edit revert.bat than to seek for it in the
build.xml when you have to update the path for a new release. Forget it,
sometimes I'm too
On 05/12/2012 04:28 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
I'm sure you are both afraid of that, but in case you freithened people
about DCL I wanted to say that since jdk 1.5 way of handling volatile
it's now possible to safely use this pattern with Java
On 05/11/2012 12:40 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Hi Adam,
please see inline:
On May 11, 2012, at 4:52 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 04/20/2012 07:53 AM, jaco...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jacopoc
Date: Fri Apr 20 12:53:35 2012
New Revision: 1328356
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev
On 05/11/2012 08:53 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 05/11/2012 12:40 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Hi Adam,
please see inline:
On May 11, 2012, at 4:52 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 04/20/2012 07:53 AM, jaco...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jacopoc
Date: Fri Apr 20 12:53:35 2012
New Revision: 1328356
URL
On 05/11/2012 09:36 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
On May 11, 2012, at 4:26 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
@@ -177,10 +184,18 @@ public class GroovyUtil {
Class? scriptClass = parsedScripts.get(script);
if (scriptClass == null) {
scriptClass = loadClass(script);
- if (Debug.verboseOn
On 05/11/2012 09:51 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 05/11/2012 09:36 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
On May 11, 2012, at 4:26 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
@@ -177,10 +184,18 @@ public class GroovyUtil {
Class? scriptClass = parsedScripts.get(script);
if (scriptClass == null) {
scriptClass = loadClass
On 05/11/2012 10:30 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
On May 11, 2012, at 4:51 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
==
result = parsedScripts.get(key)
if (result == null) {
syncyronized (parsedScripts) {
result = parsedScripts.get(key)
if (result == null) {
result = genResult
On 05/11/2012 10:49 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
On May 11, 2012, at 5:38 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 05/11/2012 10:30 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
On May 11, 2012, at 4:51 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
==
result = parsedScripts.get(key)
if (result == null) {
syncyronized (parsedScripts
On 05/11/2012 12:30 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
On May 11, 2012, at 6:34 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
There is no difference. The act of map.get() can be doing a *lot* of
separate, individual steps. Without any kind of
happens-before/happens-after on map.get(), the protected put/get
As I have discussed, I will be committing a series of separate
commits, that change findByPrimaryKey calls into findOne. I have run
the test cases on these changes, and everything compiles. However,
ofbiz does *not* have 100% coverage, no where close. Some of the
changes are inside groovy/ftl
On 05/11/2012 02:46 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
The UtilCache objects *are* thread-safe. You will not get any
internal corruption inside UtilCache. That is all that can be guaranteed.
What isn't thread safe, is that calling code may end up having
multiple instances for the same key, unless
On 05/11/2012 05:25 AM, adri...@apache.org wrote:
Author: adrianc
Date: Fri May 11 10:25:33 2012
New Revision: 1337103
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1337103view=rev
Log:
Fixed broken Mini-languagecheck-errors element (second try).
Modified:
On 05/10/2012 11:05 AM, doo...@apache.org wrote:
Author: doogie
Date: Thu May 10 16:05:00 2012
New Revision: 1336768
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1336768view=rev
Log:
FIX: s/run-install/load-demo/
I'm surprised I actually had to do this. It implies that the scripts
are not being
On 05/10/2012 11:13 AM, doo...@apache.org wrote:
Author: doogie
Date: Thu May 10 16:13:23 2012
New Revision: 1336772
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1336772view=rev
Log:
FEATURE/OPTIMIZE: Copied these from the release12.04 branch(using svn copy).
Having to manually add them to
On 05/10/2012 11:16 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
The scripts are helpful if you have a Subversion client that runs from
the command line. Some of us use a graphical Subversion client - like
Tortoise, or the Eclipse plugin.
Which brings up another thought I had. Maybe converting these to a
series of
I've added 2 major(ish) new features recently.
* salt-based password hashing(with base64 encoding)
* key-encrypting-key(kek) support.
The salt-based psasword feature was written when JIRA was hacked
several years ago; JIRA is based on an old version of OfBiz, so this
change could be considered a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4870?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13272862#comment-13272862
]
Adam Heath commented on OFBIZ-4870:
---
There is multi-threading per-datasource during
On 05/10/2012 06:40 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
I wanted to discuss this again.
Some time ago I modified my local copy of OFBiz to execute the the ant
run-install task faster by using multi-threaded entity creation and
data loading. I don't remember what i was working on at the time, but
I
On 05/10/2012 06:58 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
On 5/11/2012 12:45 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 05/10/2012 06:40 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
I wanted to discuss this again.
Some time ago I modified my local copy of OFBiz to execute the the ant
run-install task faster by using multi-threaded entity creation
On 04/20/2012 07:53 AM, jaco...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jacopoc
Date: Fri Apr 20 12:53:35 2012
New Revision: 1328356
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1328356view=rev
Log:
The cache of parsed Groovy scripts was not thread safe; this issue, in
instances with several concurrent threads
On 05/10/2012 11:46 PM, ash...@apache.org wrote:
Author: ashish
Date: Fri May 11 04:46:26 2012
New Revision: 1337024
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1337024view=rev
Log:
Applied similar fix as we did on trunk r1300463.
On production systems you can't suppress Debug.log( message by the use
On 05/10/2012 11:51 PM, ash...@apache.org wrote:
Author: ashish
Date: Fri May 11 04:51:55 2012
New Revision: 1337026
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1337026view=rev
Log:
Applied similar fix as we did on trunk r1300463.
On production systems you can't suppress Debug.log( message by the use
On 05/08/2012 11:18 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Hi Adam,
I don't know if it is useful but for some time in its history (but I don't
remember the years) the OFBiz project was hosted at dev.java.net,maybe the
url was:
https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/
dev.java.net doesn't exist either.
401 - 500 of 4276 matches
Mail list logo
