On Wed, 15 May 2024 07:51:33 GMT, Adam Sotona wrote:
>> Class file with `LineNumberTable` attribute element pointing behind the
>> bytecode array throws `ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException`.
>> This patch performs the check and throws expected
>> `IllegalArgumentException` instead.
>> Relevant
On Tue, 14 May 2024 13:18:51 GMT, Adam Sotona wrote:
> Class file with `LineNumberTable` attribute element pointing behind the
> bytecode array throws `ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException`.
> This patch performs the check and throws expected `IllegalArgumentException`
> instead.
> Relevant test is
On Fri, 10 May 2024 16:10:29 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore
wrote:
>> Consider this layout:
>>
>>
>> MemoryLayout SEQ = MemoryLayout.sequenceLayout(5,
>> MemoryLayout.sequenceLayout(10, JAVA_INT));
>>
>>
>> And the corresponding offset handle:
>>
>>
>> MethodHandle offsetHandle =
On Thu, 9 May 2024 18:26:17 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore
wrote:
>> Consider this layout:
>>
>>
>> MemoryLayout SEQ = MemoryLayout.sequenceLayout(5,
>> MemoryLayout.sequenceLayout(10, JAVA_INT));
>>
>>
>> And the corresponding offset handle:
>>
>>
>> MethodHandle offsetHandle =
On Tue, 7 May 2024 15:42:23 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore
wrote:
> This PR fixes an issue that has crept into the FFM API implementation.
>
> From very early stages, the FFM API used to disable the alignment check on
> nested layout elements, in favor of an alignment check against the memory
>
On Tue, 7 May 2024 14:58:00 GMT, Viktor Klang wrote:
> Removes SORTED if not also ORDERED for escape-hatch `Stream::spliterator()`
Marked as reviewed by psandoz (Reviewer).
-
PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/19123#pullrequestreview-2043897612
On Fri, 3 May 2024 17:13:04 GMT, Adam Sotona wrote:
>> Specifically corrupted constant pool of a class file can cause
>> ClassCastException, when the entries are accessed by Class-File API in exact
>> order.
>>
>> This fix avoids the ClassCastException and throws ConstantPoolException
>>
On Fri, 3 May 2024 15:28:05 GMT, Adam Sotona wrote:
> Specifically corrupted constant pool of a class file can cause
> ClassCastException, when the entries are accessed by Class-File API in exact
> order.
>
> This fix avoids the ClassCastException and throws ConstantPoolException
> instead.
On Thu, 2 May 2024 11:13:22 GMT, Adam Sotona wrote:
>> Class files with specifically corrupted tableswitch or lookupswitch
>> instructions in the bytecode cause OutOfMemoryError while parsing with
>> Class-File API.
>> This patch performs additional checks to avoid OOME and adds relevant
On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 15:31:02 GMT, Adam Sotona wrote:
> Class files with specifically corrupted tableswitch or lookupswitch
> instructions in the bytecode cause OutOfMemoryError while parsing with
> Class-File API.
> This patch performs additional checks to avoid OOME and adds relevant tests.
>
On Fri, 26 Apr 2024 13:34:08 GMT, Adam Sotona wrote:
>> ClassFile API dives into the nested constant pool entries without type
>> restrictions, while parsing a class file. Validation of the entry is
>> performed post-parsing. Specifically corrupted constant pool entry may cause
>> infinite
On Tue, 23 Apr 2024 11:56:41 GMT, Adam Sotona wrote:
> This patch adds missing `@throws` javadoc annotations to
> `java.lang.classfile.BufWriter`.
>
> Please review.
>
> Thank you,
> Adam
Marked as reviewed by psandoz (Reviewer).
-
PR Review:
On Thu, 25 Apr 2024 00:51:41 GMT, Adam Sotona wrote:
> Unfortunately it would have to be an expected tags list or an extra
> constructed bit mask, due to the multiple tags allowed for MemberRefEntry and
> it would slightly affect the performance.
Ah yes, i missed that. It could be two tags,
On Tue, 23 Apr 2024 12:59:18 GMT, Adam Sotona wrote:
> ClassFile API `StackMapGenerator` attaches print or hex dump of the method to
> an error message.
> However there is no such attachment when the stack maps generation is turned
> off.
>
> This patch moves class print/dump to
On Tue, 23 Apr 2024 11:56:41 GMT, Adam Sotona wrote:
> This patch adds missing `@throws` javadoc annotations to
> `java.lang.classfile.BufWriter`.
>
> Please review.
>
> Thank you,
> Adam
This looks good, but for completeness it will need a CSR.
-
PR Review:
On Tue, 23 Apr 2024 07:39:47 GMT, Adam Sotona wrote:
> ClassFile API dives into the nested constant pool entries without type
> restrictions, while parsing a class file. Validation of the entry is
> performed post-parsing. Specifically corrupted constant pool entry may cause
> infinite loop
Hi David,
It’s not at all outlandish, but would caution it's more work than one might
initially think.
Could you describe a little more about your use case? that can be helpful to
understand the larger picture and demand. Using unsigned comparison would be my
recommended approach with the
On Wed, 17 Apr 2024 16:08:31 GMT, Adam Sotona wrote:
>> Current implementation of `LambdaMetafactory` does not allow to use lambdas
>> in hidden classes. Invocation throws `NoClassDefFoundError` instead.
>>
>> This patch includes lambda implementation in a hidden class under the
>> special
On Wed, 17 Apr 2024 12:51:55 GMT, Adam Sotona wrote:
>> Current implementation of `LambdaMetafactory` does not allow to use lambdas
>> in hidden classes. Invocation throws `NoClassDefFoundError` instead.
>>
>> This patch includes lambda implementation in a hidden class under the
>> special
On Sat, 13 Apr 2024 14:27:12 GMT, Viktor Klang wrote:
>> This PR implements Gatherer-inspired encoding of `flatMap` that shows that
>> it is both competitive performance-wise as well as improve correctness.
>>
>> Below is the performance of `Stream::flatMap` (for reference types):
>>
>>
On Fri, 12 Apr 2024 14:53:01 GMT, Viktor Klang wrote:
>> This PR implements Gatherer-inspired encoding of `flatMap` that shows that
>> it is both competitive performance-wise as well as improve correctness.
>>
>> Below is the performance of `Stream::flatMap` (for reference types):
>>
>>
On Tue, 9 Apr 2024 10:07:46 GMT, Viktor Klang wrote:
>> This PR implements Gatherer-inspired encoding of `flatMap` that shows that
>> it is both competitive performance-wise as well as improve correctness.
>>
>> Below is the performance of `Stream::flatMap` (for reference types):
>>
>> Before
On Mon, 8 Apr 2024 10:20:11 GMT, Viktor Klang wrote:
> @PaulSandoz @AlanBateman I've added a commit to this PR which removes the use
> of Gatherer for Stream::flatMap, but instead implements flatMap for all of
> the pipelines using the same encoding which Gatherer would use. It seems very
>
On Mon, 8 Apr 2024 10:50:00 GMT, Evgeny Nikitin wrote:
> Improve RNG usage in said tests:
>
> 1. The RNG is not created by our Utils class, as suggested in our JTReg tests;
> 2. The seed, accordingly, is not a fixed value now, but truly random;
> 3. The tests that had been creating their own
On Fri, 15 Mar 2024 13:58:05 GMT, Hamlin Li wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Can you help to review this patch?
>> Thanks
>>
>> This is a continuation of work based on [1] by @XiaohongGong, most work was
>> done in that pr. In this new pr, just rebased the code in [1], then added
>> some minor changes
On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 23:58:32 GMT, Viktor Klang wrote:
>> Adds differentiation between direct and transitive short circuiting which
>> could prevent pushing downstream in the finisher for built-ins that were not
>> `collect()`.
>>
>> Creating this as a draft PR for now, just need to run some
On Mon, 18 Mar 2024 16:27:13 GMT, Viktor Klang wrote:
> Adds differentiation between direct and transitive short circuiting which
> could prevent pushing downstream in the finisher for built-ins that were not
> `collect()`.
>
> Creating this as a draft PR for now, just need to run some
On Sat, 2 Mar 2024 16:22:22 GMT, Jatin Bhateja wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> This patch optimizes sub-word gather operation for x86 targets with AVX2 and
>> AVX512 features.
>>
>> Following is the summary of changes:-
>>
>> 1) Intrinsify sub-word gather using hybrid algorithm which initially
>>
On Tue, 27 Feb 2024 02:47:13 GMT, Jatin Bhateja wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> This patch optimizes sub-word gather operation for x86 targets with AVX2 and
>> AVX512 features.
>>
>> Following is the summary of changes:-
>>
>> 1) Intrinsify sub-word gather using hybrid algorithm which initially
>>
On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 09:13:33 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> Looks fine.
Thanks!
-
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk22/pull/109#issuecomment-1932769043
On Tue, 6 Feb 2024 16:50:10 GMT, Paul Sandoz wrote:
> This pull request contains a backport of commit
> [1ae85138](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/1ae851387f881263ccc6aeace5afdd0f49d41d33)
> from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
>
> The commit b
This pull request contains a backport of commit
[1ae85138](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/1ae851387f881263ccc6aeace5afdd0f49d41d33)
from the [openjdk/jdk](https://git.openjdk.org/jdk) repository.
The commit being backported was authored by Paul Sandoz on 2 Feb 2024 and was
reviewed
On Mon, 5 Feb 2024 18:31:44 GMT, Adam Sotona wrote:
>> `java.lang.classfile.CodeBuilder` contains more than 230 API methods.
>> Existing ClassFile API use cases proved the concept one big CodeBuilder is
>> comfortable. However there are some redundancies, glitches in the naming
>> conventions,
On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 19:45:41 GMT, Paul Sandoz wrote:
> The implementation of method `VectorSpecies::fromMemorySegment`, in
> `AbstractSpecies::fromMemorySegment`, neglects to perform bounds checks on
> the offset argument when the method is compiled by C2 (bounds checks are
> pe
On Thu, 1 Feb 2024 12:22:10 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore
wrote:
>> My expectation is the risk is small, but of course non-zero. These tests can
>> be expensive to run so i was trying balance the risk without increasing test
>> execution times.
>>
>> I could strengthen the comment from:
>>
>>
possible in the knowledge that it calls the vector access method (the
> tests were intended to test out of bounds access when compiled by C2).
>
> Thinking ahead its tempting to remove the species access methods, simplifying
> functionality that is duplicated.
Paul Sandoz has upd
On Wed, 15 Nov 2023 22:46:03 GMT, Jorn Vernee wrote:
> See the JBS issue for an extended problem description.
>
> This patch changes the specification and implementation of
> `MethodHandles::byteArrayViewVarHandle`,
> `MethodHandles::byteBufferViewVarHandle`, `ByteBuffer::alignedSlice`, and
On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 23:53:16 GMT, Sandhya Viswanathan
wrote:
>> src/hotspot/cpu/x86/c2_MacroAssembler_x86.cpp line 1613:
>>
>>> 1611: vpand(xtmp, idx_vec, xtmp, vlen_enc);
>>> 1612: // Load double words from normalized indices.
>>> 1613: evpgatherdd(dst, gmask, Address(base, xtmp,
On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 00:10:26 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore
wrote:
>> The implementation of method `VectorSpecies::fromMemorySegment`, in
>> `AbstractSpecies::fromMemorySegment`, neglects to perform bounds checks on
>> the offset argument when the method is compiled by C2 (bounds checks are
>>
The implementation of method `VectorSpecies::fromMemorySegment`, in
`AbstractSpecies::fromMemorySegment`, neglects to perform bounds checks on the
offset argument when the method is compiled by C2 (bounds checks are performed
when interpreted and by C1).
This is an oversight and explicit
On Wed, 24 Jan 2024 18:48:34 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>> @dholmes-ora Indeed it's a compiler magic, albeit not really weird. While
>> the method execution only receives the evaluated value of `expr`, the method
>> compilation has the expression in its original form. As a result, it can
>>
On Tue, 23 Jan 2024 17:21:47 GMT, Quan Anh Mai wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This patch introduces `JitCompiler::isConstantExpression` which can be used
>> to statically determine whether an expression has been constant-folded by
>> the Jit compiler, leading to more constant-folding opportunities. For
On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 14:58:34 GMT, Jorn Vernee wrote:
>> src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/invoke/X-VarHandleByteArrayView.java.template
>> line 594:
>>
>>> 592: @ForceInline
>>> 593: static int indexRO(ByteBuffer bb, int index) {
>>> 594: if (bb.isReadOnly())
>>
On Sun, 3 Dec 2023 08:46:07 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
> This API is sitting out JDK 22, meaning no API/implementation changes in this
> PR. Some small API changes are likely for JDK 23.
>
> For now, we just need to bump JEP number/title that shows up in the preview
> section of the javadoc.
On Wed, 22 Nov 2023 09:05:31 GMT, Andrew Haley wrote:
> > Have you considered the possibility of copying the sleef source to the
> > OpenJDK repository and thereby it becomes part of the build process? I
> > don't know how straightforward that is technically and IANAL but I think
> > it's
On Wed, 22 Nov 2023 09:05:31 GMT, Andrew Haley wrote:
> > Have you considered the possibility of copying the sleef source to the
> > OpenJDK repository and thereby it becomes part of the build process? I
> > don't know how straightforward that is technically and IANAL but I think
> > it's
On Wed, 15 Nov 2023 01:32:00 GMT, Xiaohong Gong wrote:
>> Currently the vector floating-point math APIs like
>> `VectorOperators.SIN/COS/TAN...` are not intrinsified on AArch64 platform,
>> which causes large performance gap on AArch64. Note that those APIs are
>> optimized by C2 compiler on
On Wed, 15 Nov 2023 01:32:00 GMT, Xiaohong Gong wrote:
>> Currently the vector floating-point math APIs like
>> `VectorOperators.SIN/COS/TAN...` are not intrinsified on AArch64 platform,
>> which causes large performance gap on AArch64. Note that those APIs are
>> optimized by C2 compiler on
On Mon, 23 Oct 2023 09:02:35 GMT, Xiaohong Gong wrote:
> This looks good. As far as I can tell the choice you've made of accuracy
> matches what we need to meet the spec.
Same here . Sinh/cosh/tanh/expm1 are specified to be within 2.5 ulps of the
exact result, but i believe sleef does not
On Mon, 23 Oct 2023 09:02:35 GMT, Xiaohong Gong wrote:
> This looks good. As far as I can tell the choice you've made of accuracy
> matches what we need to meet the spec.
Same here . Sinh/cosh/tanh/expm1 are specified to be within 2.5 ulps of the
exact result, but i believe sleef does not
On Wed, 15 Nov 2023 22:46:03 GMT, Jorn Vernee wrote:
> See the JBS issue for an extended problem description.
>
> This patch changes the specification and implementation of
> `MethodHandles::byteArrayViewVarHandle`,
> `MethodHandles::byteBufferViewVarHandle`, `ByteBuffer::alignedSlice`, and
On Wed, 15 Nov 2023 17:50:48 GMT, Viktor Klang wrote:
>> This Pull-Request implements [JEP-461](https://openjdk.org/jeps/461)
>
> Viktor Klang has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the last revision:
>
> Improvements after feedback
Elegantly and
On Mon, 13 Nov 2023 09:22:13 GMT, Viktor Klang wrote:
>> This Pull-Request implements [JEP-461](https://openjdk.org/jeps/461)
>
> Viktor Klang has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the last revision:
>
> Minor improvements to Gatherer Javadoc
On Tue, 7 Nov 2023 17:45:36 GMT, Paul Sandoz wrote:
>> This test requires certain methods to be compiled, but without `-Xbatch` the
>> compiler races against the test code, which can lead to intermittent
>> failures.
>
> Marked as reviewed by psandoz (Reviewer).
>
On Tue, 3 Oct 2023 07:47:30 GMT, Gergö Barany wrote:
> This test requires certain methods to be compiled, but without `-Xbatch` the
> compiler races against the test code, which can lead to intermittent failures.
Marked as reviewed by psandoz (Reviewer).
-
PR Review:
On Mon, 30 Oct 2023 13:43:13 GMT, Per Minborg wrote:
>> This PR proposes removing the restriction that only heap `MemorySegment`
>> wrapping a `byte` array can be accessed by Vectors. Now any array type can
>> be used provided the element alignment constraints are respected.
>
> Per Minborg
On Mon, 30 Oct 2023 13:43:13 GMT, Per Minborg wrote:
>> This PR proposes removing the restriction that only heap `MemorySegment`
>> wrapping a `byte` array can be accessed by Vectors. Now any array type can
>> be used provided the element alignment constraints are respected.
>
> Per Minborg
On Thu, 26 Oct 2023 09:17:25 GMT, Per Minborg wrote:
>> This PR proposes removing the restriction that only heap `MemorySegment`
>> wrapping a `byte` array can be accessed by Vectors. Now any array type can
>> be used provided the element alignment constraints are respected.
>
> Per Minborg
On Wed, 18 Oct 2023 10:14:08 GMT, Viktor Klang wrote:
> Removes a few unnecessary dereferences of `sourceStage`.
Marked as reviewed by psandoz (Reviewer).
-
PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16241#pullrequestreview-1685995672
On Wed, 18 Oct 2023 09:45:53 GMT, Viktor Klang wrote:
> This PR corrects so that `opIsStateful()` is not invoked as a part of the
> java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline constructor—as `opIsStateful()` is intended
> to be overridden by subclasses, and as their own constructors have not run
> when
On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 03:44:28 GMT, Danny Thomas wrote:
> At least on Saphire Rapids the [emulation suggested
> here](https://github.com/natmaurice/x86-simd-sort/commit/41d03b2d8f3b62a2ee6a3a97a8da7f193a407026)
> only imposes a 6% penalty for `intSort`, while also mitigating the
> performance
On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 03:44:28 GMT, Danny Thomas wrote:
> At least on Saphire Rapids the [emulation suggested
> here](https://github.com/natmaurice/x86-simd-sort/commit/41d03b2d8f3b62a2ee6a3a97a8da7f193a407026)
> only imposes a 6% penalty for `intSort`, while also mitigating the
> performance
On Thu, 5 Oct 2023 23:36:48 GMT, Srinivas Vamsi Parasa wrote:
>> The goal is to develop faster sort routines for x86_64 CPUs by taking
>> advantage of AVX512 instructions. This enhancement provides an order of
>> magnitude speedup for Arrays.sort() using int, long, float and double arrays.
>>
On Thu, 5 Oct 2023 23:36:48 GMT, Srinivas Vamsi Parasa wrote:
>> The goal is to develop faster sort routines for x86_64 CPUs by taking
>> advantage of AVX512 instructions. This enhancement provides an order of
>> magnitude speedup for Arrays.sort() using int, long, float and double arrays.
>>
On Sun, 8 Oct 2023 06:18:13 GMT, Danny Thomas wrote:
>> Srinivas Vamsi Parasa has updated the pull request with a new target base
>> due to a merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 45 commits:
>>
>> - fix code style and formatting
>> - Merge branch 'master' of
On Sun, 8 Oct 2023 06:18:13 GMT, Danny Thomas wrote:
>> Srinivas Vamsi Parasa has updated the pull request with a new target base
>> due to a merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 45 commits:
>>
>> - fix code style and formatting
>> - Merge branch 'master' of
On Fri, 29 Sep 2023 00:21:52 GMT, Mourad Abbay wrote:
> Are you referring to the expand of lambdas and the extra whitespaces ?
Yes, sometimes the IDE just does it automatically!
-
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15936#issuecomment-1740160022
On Fri, 29 Sep 2023 00:37:16 GMT, Mourad Abbay wrote:
> > > Are you referring to the expand of lambdas and the extra whitespaces ?
> >
> >
> > Yes, sometimes the IDE just does it automatically!
>
> Is there a way I can make the IDE respect the code style?
I doubt it, since 1) there is no
On Wed, 27 Sep 2023 22:44:52 GMT, Mourad Abbay wrote:
>> Remove unused imports in the java.util.stream package.
>
> Mourad Abbay has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the last revision:
>
> Update copyright year.
Marked as reviewed by psandoz
On Wed, 27 Sep 2023 22:47:43 GMT, Mourad Abbay wrote:
>> Remove redundant type cast in the java.util.stream package.
>
> Mourad Abbay has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the last revision:
>
> Update copyright year.
Marked as reviewed by psandoz
On Wed, 27 Sep 2023 22:44:07 GMT, Mourad Abbay wrote:
>> Remove cases of redundant type arguments in the java.util.stream package.
>
> Mourad Abbay has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the last revision:
>
> Update copyright year.
Looks good. Note a
On Thu, 28 Sep 2023 20:39:13 GMT, Eamonn McManus wrote:
>> It looks to have been an oversight that `final` was omitted. The fields are
>> never assigned after initialization. `final` leads to shorter bytecode.
>
> Eamonn McManus has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
>
On Wed, 27 Sep 2023 08:50:20 GMT, Mourad Abbay wrote:
> Remove redundant type cast in the java.util.stream package.
src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/stream/DoublePipeline.java line 391:
> 389: if (maxSize < 0)
> 390: throw new
On Wed, 27 Sep 2023 00:58:01 GMT, Mourad Abbay wrote:
> Remove cases of redundant type arguments in the java.util.stream package.
Looks like there are a few others in the package. In `Collectors`, see see
construction of `CollectorImpl`. See also `DistinctOp`, `DoublePipeline`,
`IntPipeline`,
On Mon, 25 Sep 2023 16:54:10 GMT, Jorn Vernee wrote:
>> This patch contains the implementation of the foreign linker & memory API
>> JEP for Java 22. The initial patch is composed of commits brought over
>> directly from the [panama-foreign
>> repo](https://github.com/openjdk/panama-foreign).
On Mon, 25 Sep 2023 16:54:10 GMT, Jorn Vernee wrote:
>> This patch contains the implementation of the foreign linker & memory API
>> JEP for Java 22. The initial patch is composed of commits brought over
>> directly from the [panama-foreign
>> repo](https://github.com/openjdk/panama-foreign).
On Mon, 25 Sep 2023 16:54:10 GMT, Jorn Vernee wrote:
>> This patch contains the implementation of the foreign linker & memory API
>> JEP for Java 22. The initial patch is composed of commits brought over
>> directly from the [panama-foreign
>> repo](https://github.com/openjdk/panama-foreign).
On Mon, 25 Sep 2023 16:54:10 GMT, Jorn Vernee wrote:
>> This patch contains the implementation of the foreign linker & memory API
>> JEP for Java 22. The initial patch is composed of commits brought over
>> directly from the [panama-foreign
>> repo](https://github.com/openjdk/panama-foreign).
On Mon, 25 Sep 2023 16:54:10 GMT, Jorn Vernee wrote:
>> This patch contains the implementation of the foreign linker & memory API
>> JEP for Java 22. The initial patch is composed of commits brought over
>> directly from the [panama-foreign
>> repo](https://github.com/openjdk/panama-foreign).
On Mon, 25 Sep 2023 16:54:10 GMT, Jorn Vernee wrote:
>> This patch contains the implementation of the foreign linker & memory API
>> JEP for Java 22. The initial patch is composed of commits brought over
>> directly from the [panama-foreign
>> repo](https://github.com/openjdk/panama-foreign).
On Mon, 25 Sep 2023 16:54:10 GMT, Jorn Vernee wrote:
>> This patch contains the implementation of the foreign linker & memory API
>> JEP for Java 22. The initial patch is composed of commits brought over
>> directly from the [panama-foreign
>> repo](https://github.com/openjdk/panama-foreign).
On Mon, 25 Sep 2023 16:54:10 GMT, Jorn Vernee wrote:
>> This patch contains the implementation of the foreign linker & memory API
>> JEP for Java 22. The initial patch is composed of commits brought over
>> directly from the [panama-foreign
>> repo](https://github.com/openjdk/panama-foreign).
On Mon, 25 Sep 2023 16:54:10 GMT, Jorn Vernee wrote:
>> This patch contains the implementation of the foreign linker & memory API
>> JEP for Java 22. The initial patch is composed of commits brought over
>> directly from the [panama-foreign
>> repo](https://github.com/openjdk/panama-foreign).
On Mon, 25 Sep 2023 16:54:10 GMT, Jorn Vernee wrote:
>> This patch contains the implementation of the foreign linker & memory API
>> JEP for Java 22. The initial patch is composed of commits brought over
>> directly from the [panama-foreign
>> repo](https://github.com/openjdk/panama-foreign).
On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 17:08:48 GMT, Mourad Abbay wrote:
>> Fix Javadoc links for Stream.mapMulti, Stream.MapMultiInt,
>> Stream.mapMultiToInt, Stream.mapMultiToLong and Stream.mapMultiToDouble.
>
> Mourad Abbay has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the
On Wed, 20 Sep 2023 17:19:42 GMT, Srinivas Vamsi Parasa
wrote:
>> The goal is to develop faster sort routines for x86_64 CPUs by taking
>> advantage of AVX512 instructions. This enhancement provides an order of
>> magnitude speedup for Arrays.sort() using int, long, float and double arrays.
On Wed, 20 Sep 2023 17:19:42 GMT, Srinivas Vamsi Parasa
wrote:
>> The goal is to develop faster sort routines for x86_64 CPUs by taking
>> advantage of AVX512 instructions. This enhancement provides an order of
>> magnitude speedup for Arrays.sort() using int, long, float and double arrays.
On Wed, 20 Sep 2023 17:19:42 GMT, Srinivas Vamsi Parasa
wrote:
>> The goal is to develop faster sort routines for x86_64 CPUs by taking
>> advantage of AVX512 instructions. This enhancement provides an order of
>> magnitude speedup for Arrays.sort() using int, long, float and double arrays.
On Wed, 20 Sep 2023 17:19:42 GMT, Srinivas Vamsi Parasa
wrote:
>> The goal is to develop faster sort routines for x86_64 CPUs by taking
>> advantage of AVX512 instructions. This enhancement provides an order of
>> magnitude speedup for Arrays.sort() using int, long, float and double arrays.
On Wed, 20 Sep 2023 16:27:19 GMT, Srinivas Vamsi Parasa
wrote:
> This API was suggested to me and was already reviewed by others.
Confirming so, this was my suggestion. We use the _double-register_ addressing
mode (as commonly applied in unsafe), thereby the intrinsic is capable of being
On Wed, 20 Sep 2023 16:27:19 GMT, Srinivas Vamsi Parasa
wrote:
> This API was suggested to me and was already reviewed by others.
Confirming so, this was my suggestion. We use the _double-register_ addressing
mode (as commonly applied in unsafe), thereby the intrinsic is capable of being
On Fri, 15 Sep 2023 20:17:17 GMT, Paul Sandoz wrote:
>>> Alan, you mentioned that DualPivotQuicksort will need detailed review. Can
>>> we go ahead and start reviewing? Laurent checked performance, JMH results
>>> look fine.
>>
>> As before, I t
On Mon, 18 Sep 2023 18:09:57 GMT, Mourad Abbay wrote:
> Fix Javadoc links for Stream.mapMulti, Stream.MapMultiInt,
> Stream.mapMultiToInt, Stream.mapMultiToLong and Stream.mapMultiToDouble.
Note to others. I suggested @mabbay pick up the dropped
On Fri, 1 Sep 2023 06:12:57 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
> > Alan, you mentioned that DualPivotQuicksort will need detailed review. Can
> > we go ahead and start reviewing? Laurent checked performance, JMH results
> > look fine.
>
> As before, I think the main question with this change is whether
On Wed, 13 Sep 2023 23:02:21 GMT, Srinivas Vamsi Parasa
wrote:
> Could you please have a look at the changes in `DualPivotQuicksort.java` and
> provide your feedback?
I agree that is much cleaner, glad that worked out. That neatly covers multiple
element types and Java-based insertion sort
On Wed, 13 Sep 2023 23:02:21 GMT, Srinivas Vamsi Parasa
wrote:
> Could you please have a look at the changes in `DualPivotQuicksort.java` and
> provide your feedback?
I agree that is much cleaner, glad that worked out. That neatly covers multiple
element types and Java-based insertion sort
On Fri, 8 Sep 2023 15:54:05 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
> There are several methods defined by sun.misc.Unsafe that have standard API
> equivalents for many years and releases. The change proposed here is to
> deprecate, for removal, the park, unpark, getLoadAverage, loadFence,
> storeFence, and
On Thu, 31 Aug 2023 21:31:40 GMT, Srinivas Vamsi Parasa
wrote:
>> The goal is to develop faster sort routines for x86_64 CPUs by taking
>> advantage of AVX512 instructions. This enhancement provides an order of
>> magnitude speedup for Arrays.sort() using int, long, float and double arrays.
On Thu, 31 Aug 2023 21:31:40 GMT, Srinivas Vamsi Parasa
wrote:
>> The goal is to develop faster sort routines for x86_64 CPUs by taking
>> advantage of AVX512 instructions. This enhancement provides an order of
>> magnitude speedup for Arrays.sort() using int, long, float and double arrays.
On Thu, 31 Aug 2023 21:31:40 GMT, Srinivas Vamsi Parasa
wrote:
>> The goal is to develop faster sort routines for x86_64 CPUs by taking
>> advantage of AVX512 instructions. This enhancement provides an order of
>> magnitude speedup for Arrays.sort() using int, long, float and double arrays.
1 - 100 of 3413 matches
Mail list logo
