Re: [Alsa-devel] Philips Acoustic Edge

2001-10-12 Thread Paul Davis
it's been the same with MOTU, some vendors are just ignorant of a large potential customer base. lets not kid ourselves. there is a *tiny* potential customer base for the next several years at least, and the existing customer base is even smaller. the customer base for audio chipsets in things

RE: [Alsa-devel] Philips Acoustic Edge

2001-10-12 Thread James Courtier-Dutton
If hardware manufactures wanted their products to have good support on Linux, all they have to do is publish the hardware programming details, and the linux community will do the actual driver development. I still don't understand what manufactures are protecting by not releasing the programming

Re: [Alsa-devel] Philips Acoustic Edge

2001-10-12 Thread dave willis
On Fri, 12 Oct 2001, Paul Davis wrote: it's been the same with MOTU, some vendors are just ignorant of a large potential customer base. lets not kid ourselves. there is a *tiny* potential customer base for the next several years at least, and the existing customer base is even smaller.

Re: [Alsa-devel] Philips Acoustic Edge

2001-10-12 Thread Paul Davis
i seriously doubt that. perhaps it's true for additional companies, as hammerfall is well established in the high-end and m-audio (and terratec) how many hammerfall purchasers do you think run linux? even the fact that the most impressive and forward-thinking demo of the last 2 years (mcgill's

Re: [Alsa-devel] Philips Acoustic Edge

2001-10-12 Thread Paul Davis
If hardware manufactures wanted their products to have good support on Linux, all they have to do is publish the hardware programming details, and the linux community will do the actual driver development. thats why i wrote inertia-bound companies. they don't see this. they think that linux

RE: [Alsa-devel] Philips Acoustic Edge

2001-10-12 Thread Erik Inge Bolsø
On Fri, 12 Oct 2001, James Courtier-Dutton wrote: All chip only manufactures publish the details. I don't have any Philips hardware, but there is a principal here. Well, the DSP chip on the Acoustic Edge series_does_ have a 68 page datasheet available. It may not be enough to write a driver, but

Re: [Alsa-devel] D-CLASS amplifier module for ALSA

2001-10-12 Thread CeDeROM
Hi! Paul Davis wrote: Linux runs on at least a dozen h/w platforms. AFAIK, no device driver directly includes assembler, and if they do, they are unlikely to be part of the mainstream kernel. They certainly wouldn't be part of ALSA, I would hope. a part of assembly-howto :) Meanwhile,

Re: [Alsa-devel] D-CLASS amplifier module for ALSA

2001-10-12 Thread Patrick Ohiomoba
That you can't buy this is no excuse as it's online on the O'Reilly site (the entire book is online in pdf and html formats). Don't you love linux/ open source?? See Linux Device Drivers by Rubini, A., published by O'Reilly. (...) I would really love to, but i have no ability to buy this

Re: [Alsa-devel] Philips Acoustic Edge

2001-10-12 Thread Dan Hollis
On Fri, 12 Oct 2001, Frans Ketelaars wrote: Also, quoting http://www.smcc.demon.nl/webcam/ : A few words of thanks... Philips gratiously donated a PCVC680, a PCVC730 and a PCVC740 webcam for driver development, and kudos to their engineers which have to endure the stream of E-mails

RE: [Alsa-devel] Philips Acoustic Edge

2001-10-12 Thread Dan Hollis
On Fri, 12 Oct 2001, James Courtier-Dutton wrote: I still don't understand what manufactures are protecting by not releasing the programming details needed for 3rd parties to develope their own drivers. I've found several reasons: 1) They don't even have documentation themselves (which is

Re: [Alsa-devel] Philips Acoustic Edge

2001-10-12 Thread Peter Enderborg
Paul Davis wrote: it's been the same with MOTU, some vendors are just ignorant of a large potential customer base. lets not kid ourselves. there is a *tiny* potential customer base for the next several years at least, and the existing customer base is even smaller. It is realy a small

Re: [Alsa-devel] D-CLASS amplifier module for ALSA

2001-10-12 Thread Paul Davis
Linux runs on at least a dozen h/w platforms. AFAIK, no device driver directly includes assembler, and if they do, they are unlikely to be part of the mainstream kernel. They certainly wouldn't be part of ALSA, I would hope. a part of assembly-howto :) [ ... example elided ... ] Small,

[Alsa-devel] Missing MODULE_LICENSE in hwdep.c

2001-10-12 Thread Chris Rankin
Hi, I've noticed that the ALSA modules have suddenly gained GPL license tags. Unfortunately I think you missed one: the snd-hwdep module. Cheers, Chris __ Do You Yahoo!? Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals. http://personals.yahoo.com

Re: [Alsa-devel] Philips Acoustic Edge

2001-10-12 Thread Dan Hollis
On Sat, 13 Oct 2001, Peter Enderborg wrote: It is realy a small market. For example one of the big midi interface manufactures (Midiman) don't even have full supprt of there new highend products for windows 2000. You have to go for windows 9x or NT for that. But it is strage, they only have

Re: [Alsa-devel] D-CLASS amplifier module for ALSA

2001-10-12 Thread Michael Ashton
On Fri, Oct 12, 2001 at 07:43:04PM +0200, CeDeROM wrote: I made such circuit on AT89C52 microcontroller, but chip is too slow for that job. Odd .. I'd expect you could get away with using a timer or something, but those timers may not be very good at PWM generation .. So I've diecided to use

[Alsa-devel] [PATCH] module tags for alsa-driver/kernel/hwdep.c

2001-10-12 Thread Daniel T. Chen
Is this patch acceptable for alsa-driver/kernel/hwdep.c (against CVS)? Thanks... --- Dan Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG key: www.cs.unc.edu/~chenda/pubkey.gpg.asc --- alsa-driver/kernel/hwdep.c Fri May 11 03:35:08 2001 +++ alsa-driver/kernel/hwdep.c Fri Oct 12 23:33:23 2001 @@