Dan Hollis wrote:
On Sat, 13 Oct 2001, Peter Enderborg wrote:
It is realy a small market. For example one of the big midi interface
manufactures (Midiman) don't even have full supprt of there new
highend products for windows 2000. You have to go for windows 9x or NT
for that. But it is
dave willis wrote:
On Sat, 13 Oct 2001, Peter Enderborg wrote:
It is realy a small market. For example one of the big midi interface
manufactures (Midiman) don't even have full supprt of there new
highend products for windows 2000.
you must be thinking of someone else. all of their
it's been the same with MOTU, some vendors are just ignorant of a
large potential customer base.
lets not kid ourselves. there is a *tiny* potential customer base for
the next several years at least, and the existing customer base is
even smaller.
the customer base for audio chipsets in things
Sent: 12 October 2001 12:59
To: J rn Nettingsmeier
Cc: Michael Staggs; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Alsa-devel] Philips Acoustic Edge
it's been the same with MOTU, some vendors are just ignorant of a
large potential customer base.
lets not kid ourselves. there is a *tiny* potential
On Fri, 12 Oct 2001, Paul Davis wrote:
it's been the same with MOTU, some vendors are just ignorant of a
large potential customer base.
lets not kid ourselves. there is a *tiny* potential customer base for
the next several years at least, and the existing customer base is
even smaller.
i seriously doubt that. perhaps it's true for additional companies, as
hammerfall is well established in the high-end and m-audio (and terratec)
how many hammerfall purchasers do you think run linux? even the fact
that the most impressive and forward-thinking demo of the last 2 years
(mcgill's
If hardware manufactures wanted their products to have good support on
Linux, all they have to do is publish the hardware programming details, and
the linux community will do the actual driver development.
thats why i wrote inertia-bound companies. they don't see this. they
think that linux
On Fri, 12 Oct 2001, James Courtier-Dutton wrote:
All chip only manufactures publish the details.
I don't have any Philips hardware, but there is a principal here.
Well, the DSP chip on the Acoustic Edge series_does_ have a 68 page
datasheet available. It may not be enough to write a driver, but
On Fri, 12 Oct 2001, Frans Ketelaars wrote:
Also, quoting http://www.smcc.demon.nl/webcam/ :
A few words of thanks...
Philips gratiously donated a PCVC680, a PCVC730 and a PCVC740 webcam for driver
development,
and kudos to their engineers which have to endure the stream of
E-mails
On Fri, 12 Oct 2001, James Courtier-Dutton wrote:
I still don't understand what manufactures are protecting by not releasing
the programming details needed for 3rd parties to develope their own
drivers.
I've found several reasons:
1) They don't even have documentation themselves (which is
Paul Davis wrote:
it's been the same with MOTU, some vendors are just ignorant of a
large potential customer base.
lets not kid ourselves. there is a *tiny* potential customer base for
the next several years at least, and the existing customer base is
even smaller.
It is realy a small
On Sat, 13 Oct 2001, Peter Enderborg wrote:
It is realy a small market. For example one of the big midi interface
manufactures (Midiman) don't even have full supprt of there new
highend products for windows 2000. You have to go for windows 9x or NT
for that. But it is strage, they only have
Michael Staggs wrote:
I asked Philips for information needed to build linux drivers as per the
ALSA call to contributors. The reply I got was very disheartening:
Philips continues to watch the Linux market and driver development will be
related to increased adoption of the Linux
13 matches
Mail list logo
