You can't, because this violates software layering: you can't have something
built on top of an OS whose behaviors survive the installation of another OS.
Software that accomplishes what you want would have to be much much lower in
the stack, and would frankly be a very bad idea. JBQ
--
I'm assuming that you have an explicit and strong reason to stay away from GCM
or Firebase.
Two aspects:
-In any mobile environment, you absolutely have to be able to deal with
situations where sockets get closed on you anyway, and not have connectivity
for a while. If you want to match GCM or
Spaces aren't legal characters in URIs, even though many tools accept them. You
should URI-encode them. While this is not a fully scalable solution for all
types of characters that might appear in a URI and cause problems, replacing
all spaces in a URI with %20 is likely to solve your immediate
The biggest problem you can have running on 6.0 is expecting that your app has
all the permissions it requests, whereas starting with 6.0 the user can revoke
some of those permissions, even if you target an earlier version.
That is a great opportunity to ask yourself for every single permission
Odd, somehow the Dialer directory doesn't contain the customary NOTICE and
MODULE_LICENSE_APACHE2 files that are included in most Android directories.
Likely an oversight from Google, most probably when Dialer got split off from
Contacts. Oops, I guess I deserve some of that blame.
Individual
http://developer.android.com/reference/android/content/Intent.html#ACTION_SCREEN_ON
Using this is probably a bad idea, though, as it requires that you keep a
Service running at least while the screen is off, which in turn uses RAM, which
in turn might cause other services to get bumped from
Those BT and WiFi APIs are used to determine proximity between devices, i.e.
location, so it's expected that they are also tied to location as a baseline.
JBQ
--
Jean-Baptiste M. "JBQ" QuéruMobile Excellence Architect, YahooSent from Yahoo
Mail
On Saturday, April 23, 2016 5:10 PM, Nancy G
blockquote, div.yahoo_quoted { margin-left: 0 !important; border-left:1px
#715FFA solid !important; padding-left:1ex !important; background-color:white
!important; } Assuming that the new APK is available to the same users as the
old one, there are several scenarios that can cause what you're
blockquote, div.yahoo_quoted { margin-left: 0 !important; border-left:1px
#715FFA solid !important; padding-left:1ex !important; background-color:white
!important; } Your biggest problem on a 2G network might actually be latency.
Resolving DNS, establishing a TCP connection, negotiating TLS
There are many devices out there with screens below 320 dpi. Even if your app
is phone-only, there are many hdpi phones out there (240 dpi)
(480*{800,848,854}), and mdpi isn't quite dead yet (160 dpi).
Chances are, an issue very directly related to the screen density would affect
all such
Or even the android-porting mailing list if you're not planning to
contribute that application back to the Android Open-Source Project.
JBQ
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 3:01 PM, Yusuf T. Mobileyusuf.s...@t-mobile.com wrote:
We plan to build our own firmware and have the app pre-installed.
This
Can you try serving the same file over an https connection (instead of http)?
Does the issue disappear 24 hours after the first failure?
JBQ
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 9:36 PM, Robin Cobb robinc...@hotmail.com wrote:
I submitted this (very 1st post) to this forum 8 hours ago and it
never
You should ask this question in the android-porting group
JBQ
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 12:39 AM, shirish_samsung shirish@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am relatively new to android,i have ported android 1.5 on my
target,but the display seems to be cropped ,i mean the displayed image
seems to be
Indeed, the system doesn't distinguish PendingIntents based on their
extras alone.
JBQ
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 2:17 PM, Andy King andyk...@greatlogic.com wrote:
I have seen some posts identifying issues with PendingIntent objects,
indicating that there is no distinction between the
If I remember correctly, the search widget is part of the home app,
it's not implemented with the app widget APIs.
JBQ
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 9:18 PM, SurtaX garylo@gmail.com wrote:
Hi I have noticed that alot of the basic input controls are not
implemented for app widgets (Ie.
Try to call your file 51-android.rules.
(I think something changed in 9.0.4 where a module that the android
stuff relies on is also initialized at step 50 which ends up being too
late).
JBQ
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 9:00 AM, Breno breno.min...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Is Ubunto 9.04
We can't test on every possible version of every possible environment.
The file in question compiles for us on all platforms (the 1.5_r1 SDK
was built with that exact source code).
All the changes are reviewed individually and automatically built for
each target platform. And we did explicitly
finish() doesn't close your application, is just closes your activity.
The Appliction object itself stays behind, as well, as the entire
process, as long as there's memory available to keep them around, so
that re-launching your app is faster then next time around.
JBQ
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at
pm, Jean-Baptiste Queru j...@android.com wrote:
finish() doesn't close your application, is just closes your activity.
The Appliction object itself stays behind, as well, as the entire
process, as long as there's memory available to keep them around, so
that re-launching your app is faster
referenced by static
variables, so might be all the variables are still hiding in the
memory even after the app has exited.
is there any other way to kill the process when finish() is called...?
On Apr 28, 6:10 pm, Jean-Baptiste Queru j...@android.com wrote:
This is not the way Android works
Correct, you can only use the exact classes that are marked as available.
JBQ
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 6:09 AM, nEx.Software justin.shapc...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it safe to assume that classes derived of those allowed are not
usable?
So, if I created a custom button or something that extends
The issue (1) with turning copy protection on (or off) was in Android
1.0/1.1, and there's been no fix for it made on top of those versions.
I believe that it is fixed in 1.5, which means that you might be OK if
you deliver a copy-protected version with minSdkVersion=3 - I'm not
sure, though.
All right, here's the deal:
One of the reasons that motivated the change is battery life, which is
a major point of frustration for many Android users. More precisely,
we've noticed in our testing that there was a strong correlation
between user complaints about battery life and specific
It's already possible for a user to see an app's permissions - though
it'd be nice indeed if the list could be organized the other way
(contributions welcome).
At least anecdotally, though, we've noticed that users (even
sophisticated ones) don't associate poor battery life or control over
some
This question should go in the android-porting group.
Thanks,
JBQ
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 6:53 AM, l hx lihongxia8...@gmail.com wrote:
now android use the vold instead of mountd. who know why? and if i use vold,
i can not mount the sd card in my device. how i can do?
--
Jean-Baptiste
It's not part of the cupcake project.
JBQ
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 7:49 PM, moontain chen.worksp...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
The OpenWnn project was involved in the cupcake project when I got the code
at 1st April, but it disappears in the latest cupcake code. Why? Will it be
in the final
The proper way would be to start the relevant activity. I don't know
whether the specific Intent to start that activity is documented as
part of the public API, though.
JBQ
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 7:58 AM, Hans hkess...@gmail.com wrote:
Google applications do it, and apparently it used to be
Well, that's not the kind of setting that you should change in the
user's back. Launching an activity allows the user to make a conscious
decision about the way they manage their phone.
JBQ
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 8:55 AM, Hans hkess...@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 20, 11:03 am, Jean-Baptiste
We focused our energy on getting the source code for 1.5 available.
JBQ
On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 5:30 AM, Marek Urbaniak
marek.urban...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 28, 9:12 pm, Jean-Baptiste Queru j...@android.com wrote:
The exact source code for 1.1 is not available.
Why?
--
Jean
Environment.getExternalStorageState()
JBQ
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 9:34 PM, sunwrt wrt.su...@gmail.com wrote:
Any guy knows how to check if sdcard is mounted in program
Thanks in advance!
--
Jean-Baptiste M. JBQ Queru
Android Engineer, Google.
Questions sent directly to me that have
First, this isn't quite on-topic for this group (neither is the
meta-discussion about patent laws and their interpretation that is
almost guaranteed to follow), as this has no relationship to the
official Android SDK.
Second, more importantly, many people who read and participate in this
group
The latest cupcake source drop (done a few hours ago) matches the
preview SDK. We're working to tag it. Note that this isn't release 1.5
of Android, it's just a code drop that matches an official preview
SDK.
It's not going to run on ADP1 as it lacks the proprietary files that
are needed for
-I'd like to point out that this isn't an official SDK, with e.g. no
guarantee that applications developed with it will work on future
versions of Android. Should anyone have questions about using it,
please use the android-discuss group as android-developers is for
questions about the official
@googlegroups.com
[mailto:android-develop...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Jean-Baptiste
Queru
Sent: 05 April 2009 14:12
To: android-developers@googlegroups.com
Subject: [android-developers] Re: Cupcake SDKs available for download
-I'd like to point out that this isn't an official SDK, with e.g
[mailto:android-develop...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Jean-Baptiste
Queru
Sent: 05 April 2009 17:08
To: android-developers@googlegroups.com
Subject: [android-developers] Re: Cupcake SDKs available for download
[inline]
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 8:45 AM, Al Sutton a...@funkyandroid.com wrote:
Hi JBQ
This is definitely new in cupcake - it's part of the work that has
been done by the tools team to allow a single SDK to work with
multiple target configurations, and the visible effect is that
launching the emulator outside of either the source tree or a
fully-configured SDK distribution might
This isn't quite the right group for this question, at the moment
android-porting would be appropriate.
The alsa code is specific to certain hardware and isn't part of the
core Android Open-Source Project, so it isn't included in the main
manifest for the project.
JBQ
On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at
You probably migrated from a Java 1.6 to a Java 1.5 environment. Java
1.6 allows to specify @override on interface methods, Java 1.5
restricts it to superclass methods.
JBQ
On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 10:07 AM, Bob bshumsk...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to change the computer that I am
You're asking in the wrong group - this group is to support developers
creating apps using the official SDK.
JBQ
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 8:04 PM, Eric Chen jude...@gmail.com wrote:
I met the same problem from two weeks ago, if any one fixed it pls help me.
Best Regards
Eric Chen
On Wed,
Use smaller images. You're trying to allocate a bitmap that's 20 times
larger than the screen. That's just unrealistic on a constrained
device like a cell phone.
JBQ
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 8:08 AM, zeeshan genx...@gmail.com wrote:
any solution?
On Apr 2, 2:05 pm, zeeshan genx...@gmail.com
Dev phones indeed explicitly don't get OTA updates, for several reasons:
-developers are assumed to be capable of manually updating their phones.
-those phones are designed to allow running custom versions of the
system, and an automated update could cause some damage.
-developers have
Please don't cross-post.
Thanks,
JBQ
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 1:12 AM, Bai.Luo bai@zte.com.cn wrote:
what is the advantage and special feature of Binder in android?
--
Jean-Baptiste M. JBQ Queru
Android Engineer, Google.
Questions sent directly to me that have no reason for being
is
BLUETOOTH_ADMIN. Maybe other permission rather than the permission
WRITE_SECURE_SETTING is needed?
Stanley
On Mar 26, 9:35 pm, Jean-Baptiste Queru j...@android.com wrote:
As far as I know this permissions won't be available to applications.
My understanding is that there activities that your application
No problem playing an MP3 from the SD card. You should be able to
ACTION_VIEW the file:/// URI directly, or invoke the media scanner on
it and ACTION_VIEW the resulting content:// URI (added bonus for the
second method is that the file will immediately show up in the music
player as well).
JBQ
There are no multi-touch APIs in Android.
JBQ
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 9:30 PM, Pratap ajit@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Rajesh for your inputs.
Can somebody from Google provide an official stand on multi finger
touch capability on android.
Regards
--
Jean-Baptiste M. JBQ Queru
Queru j...@android.com wrote:
That wouldn't work, as you could download with the locked firmware,
flash an unlocked firmware, and get the files out.
JBQ
2009/3/2 vendor vendor@gmail.com:
What do you think about the idea of two firmware versions for ADP1?
2009/3/3 Jean-Baptiste
The exact source code for 1.1 is not available. 1.1 isn't hugely
different from 1.0, which you can get with
repo init -u git://android.git.kernel.org/platform/manifest.git -b release-1.0
repo sync
but that's most probably not going to be line-exact.
JBQ
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 6:05 PM, luggie
As far as I know this permissions won't be available to applications.
My understanding is that there activities that your application will
be able start that allow the user to change the settings in question.
JBQ
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 6:31 AM, Stanley.lei xiaofeng.lei...@gmail.com wrote:
There are some problems with that approach:
-it's an arms race. You've already identified the need for certain
apps to continue running even when there's an exclusive app running,
which'd have to be protected by a permission. Either that permission
is system-only and we move further away from
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 7:25 AM, Stoyan Damov stoyan.da...@gmail.com wrote:
Screw the developer. I'll put myself in the shoes of the user. I have
launched myself a game. I want it to run at full speed.
I could care less that a background service, polling RSS feeds have
just found out that
Damov stoyan.da...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Jean-Baptiste Queru j...@android.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 7:25 AM, Stoyan Damov stoyan.da...@gmail.com wrote:
Screw the developer. I'll put myself in the shoes of the user. I have
launched myself a game. I want
Code drops before the one that was done about 2 weeks ago had another
mechanism for the management of the SD card (mountd vs vold), so that
vold.conf wouldn't be necessary there.
JBQ
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Anonymous Anonymous
firewallbr...@googlemail.com wrote:
For me too the sdcard
1.1 was essentially a update of a few Google-proprietary bits on top
of the same platform as 1.0.
From the point of view of the Android platform (and therefore of the
SDK as well), the differences between 1.0 and 1.1 are extremely minor.
Cupcake is a branch name, it's not a released version. A
on a new release of a platform are users who are
trying out a new 'phone in a shop.
Al.
-Original Message-
From: android-developers@googlegroups.com
[mailto:android-develop...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Jean-Baptiste
Queru
Sent: 24 March 2009 15:39
To: android-developers
@googlegroups.com
[mailto:android-develop...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Jean-Baptiste
Queru
Sent: 24 March 2009 15:39
To: android-developers@googlegroups.com
Subject: [android-developers] Re: Cupcake coming in April? Where is the
SDK?
1.1 was essentially a update of a few Google
Engineers can't talk about forward-looking scheduling aspects. That's
not our job, and that's not something we're allowed to talk about.
We can however talk about hard facts. There's been a source code drop
recently, and David gave instructions on how to use that to compile
your own SDK-like
Run su in your shell, and you'll be running a root shell.
JBQ
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 7:45 PM, havexz bali.param...@gmail.com wrote:
Also tried login to shell using adb but i am unable to browse to that
directory.. the error is given below:
$ ls
ls
sqlite_stmt_journals
cache
sdcard
Those permissions are reserved for the system and aren't available to
applications.
JBQ
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 10:34 PM, Ling Yun drling...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, All guru
I am a beginner for android development. I found my application
always
get Not granting permission warning when I
Heh.
Jason Parks is my manager at Google, he's a member of the Core
Technical Team for the Android Open-Source Project, and he is
responsible for the overall performance and stability of the Android
platform.
He broke it because, well, that's what he does ;-)
JBQ
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 4:40
If you're using the web UI for groups, how about bookmarking the
threads you're interested in?
JBQ
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 1:49 AM, Tommaso nuccio.tomm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Google-Team,
I was wondering, why there is no functionality to pin threads a user
is interested in. As there is
And, of course, you can star a conversation and see it in the web UI
under Favorites.
JBQ
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 5:48 AM, Jean-Baptiste Queru j...@android.com wrote:
If you're using the web UI for groups, how about bookmarking the
threads you're interested in?
JBQ
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009
You should really move this thread to android-discuss, so that people
who are actually trying to achieve something here don't see their
discussions lost in the noise.
Thanks,
JBQ
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 7:18 PM, Schiffres schifty...@gmail.com wrote:
This is a message to all other Android
didn't see in the framework to ask for a file download or is the
normal way to do that is to do it manually (using HttpClient or
URL.openConnection and all that jazz).
Thanks a lot!
BoD
On Mar 18, 3:50 pm, Jean-Baptiste Queru j...@android.com wrote:
It's not accessible to applications.
JBQ
If those apps were downloaded from Android Market, just be sure to
sign into the new device with the same Google account and re-download
the apps there (they'll be listed in Market - My Downloads).
JBQ
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 1:48 AM, Carl Whalley
carl.whal...@googlemail.com wrote:
With the
As far as I know this is not run-time configurable.
JBQ
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 3:21 AM, Michael Bollmann
michael.bollm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Is it possible to configure the ADP1 to keep the last 5mb(for example)
of log messages
especially when it's not connected to a development
something like ?x=y at the end of the URL when
downloading it. That should have solved it too.
-Mike
On Mar 17, 5:49 am, Jean-Baptiste Queru j...@android.com wrote:
There is a transparent proxy on T-Mobile's port 80, which works at the
IP level (so it doesn't need to be explicitly configured
Mark's answers are correct.
A bit of extra precision:
-use the android-platform group if you want to contribute your changes
back to the main Android source for inclusion in future official
releases. Use android-porting if you are working in a copy of the
Android source and don't intend to
Unfortunately neither the exact code for the 1.0 SDK nor for 1.1
(especially for 1.1) are available.
Versions 126986 and 128600 respectively match PLAT-RC33 (current
version for the T-Mobile G1 in the US) and TMI-RC9 (the European
equivalent).
Here's the relevant code in 1.1, which matches the
I haven't looked in detail, but this looks like yet another case of a
platform application that uses private platform APIs and therefore
can't be built against the SDK.
JBQ
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 7:57 AM, Hans hkess...@gmail.com wrote:
Manifest for Camera.git application lists this service.
in-house at Google? I'm just looking
for what my requirements would be in order to build the Camera
application if truly necessary.
Thanks,
Hans
Appreciated - Hans
On Mar 15, 10:58 am, Jean-Baptiste Queru j...@android.com wrote:
I haven't looked in detail, but this looks like yet
-Baptiste Queru j...@android.com
wrote:
Unfortunately neither the exact code for the 1.0 SDK nor for 1.1
(especially for 1.1) are available.
Versions 126986 and 128600 respectively match PLAT-RC33 (current
version for the T-Mobile G1 in the US) and TMI-RC9 (the European
equivalent).
Here's
on this a bunch but found nothing but vagaries that make
it sound like no ones actually doing this right now.
Thanks,
Hans
On Mar 15, 11:40 am, Jean-Baptiste Queru j...@android.com wrote:
Oh, I see. The real problem is that the class in question was deleted
a long time ago, but the manifest
Sounds like you don't have git installed on your system.
JBQ
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 7:03 PM, doubleslash doublesl...@gmail.com wrote:
I have the same problem. I tried curl and verified indeed the whole
python script was downloaded. I installed libreadline5-dev instead of
lib32readline5.dev
ro stands for read-only. Those can't be modified.
JBQ
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 3:01 AM, Nio luodali...@gmail.com wrote:
hi all,
I can find that build.prop in the direction product/generic/system/
build, and there are some items like ro.build.id=TC3 etc. I want to
add my modification here
I've notified the Android Market team about the situation.
JBQ
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 6:16 PM, jsdf jasons...@gmail.com wrote:
I am trying to sign up for a merchant account but it seems to be down:
Sorry, we could not setup your merchant account.
Please try again later.
Can anyone else
.
2009/3/13 Jean-Baptiste Queru j...@android.com
ro stands for read-only. Those can't be modified.
JBQ
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 3:01 AM, Nio luodali...@gmail.com wrote:
hi all,
I can find that build.prop in the direction product/generic/system/
build, and there are some items like
the OEM. I guess i can change or add some thing in the file build.prop. I
saw lots of item like that there.
2009/3/13 Jean-Baptiste Queru j...@android.com
Those are set in the factory, they're not meant to be modified by
applications.
JBQ
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 8:30 AM, Daliang Luo luodali
I'm looking into this.
JBQ
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 8:34 AM, andycarr acarr_...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
Hi, do you know which license the Android Debug Bridge (ADB) is
licensed under?
I am unable to find any reference to the ADB license in the SDK
documentation.
The file NOTICE.TXT, in the
The relevant information is here:
http://android.git.kernel.org/?p=platform/system/core.git;a=blob;f=adb/adb.c;h=fa5269f5037c652a32954596aa90ab7ce9c73d9b;hb=HEAD
I've made a note to make that more clear in the future.
JBQ
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 11:52 AM, Jean-Baptiste Queru j...@android.com
There isn't any. 1.1 isn't explicitly available in the open-source
tree. All the features developed for 1.1 were merged into the cupcake
tree, which is available.
JBQ
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Michael Burton m...@niskala.org wrote:
Don't see a clear response to this, has anyone found
Please mention this a http://b.android.com so that we don't lose track of it.
Thanks,
JBQ
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Colin crgod...@gmail.com wrote:
There may be issues with this, but I have run into problems developing
for android that could easily be solved by this:
Maybe add an
Well, there is a risk that a bug in 1.0 that would have been fixed in
1.1 could be hit by your application. I'm not explicitly aware of such
situations, but that's definitely possible in theory.
It is possible (and in fact reasonably easy) to downgrade an ADP1 back
to 1.0, the drawback being
I got one of those too. My guess is that some member on the list has
an auto-auto-responder because their mailbox is full.
JBQ
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Stoyan Damov stoyan.da...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you for the prompt reply.
I don't know what could be the problem, I'm posting by
Unlike consumer devices that are designed for specific regions or
countries, the Android Dev Phone 1 is a worldwide phone, configured to
be identical in all geographies. The Android Dev Phone 1 ships in
countries where Google Latitude isn't available, and that currently
prevents from enabling
We'll gladly accept high-quality contributions to optimize this.
JBQ
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 8:49 AM, Stoyan Damov stoyan.da...@gmail.com wrote:
BTW, the Android engineer who wrote the throwIfRecycled method should
be lynched. I understand that it saves an if, as in:
if
(1) - yes the other app will still receive broadcasts, expose
providers, services, etc... The choice only happens for calls to
startActivity that hit two or more equivalent activity intent filters.
(2) - in settings / manage applications, preferences can be removed.
Or by uninstalling your
The default behavior of the back key is to exit your activity by
calling finish() (which should pop to the next activity in the
activity stack of the task your activity was in, or to another task if
your activity was at the bottom of its task). You can override that.
The behavior of the home key
That's not possible. If your application responds to the right
intents, the user will be offered a choice when doing an action that
can be handled both by the built-in application and by your
application.
JBQ
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 6:12 AM, shaddu shad...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Android,
We
No official system images are currently available for the ADP1. We're
working on it.
JBQ
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 9:30 AM, victorcab victor...@gmail.com wrote:
Have you found any info? I am looking for a similar solution.
On Feb 10, 3:30 am, Andreas Jellinghaus tolon...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
.
But - wouldnt that cause problems elsewhere (other instances where
the OS or another app may want/need to close down my app) ?!
Shimon
On Mar 5, 3:57 pm, Jean-Baptiste Queru j...@android.com wrote:
The default behavior of the back key is to exit your activity by
calling finish() (which should pop
You need to be able to work directly in the system image, i.e. to work
directly with (or to be) a device manufacturer.
JBQ
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 9:27 AM, Explore Android
explore.andr...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I am working on social networking application and our company/operator
Yes, it's a known issue. From what I know the browser in android has
issues with CSS overflow on divs.
JBQ
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 7:19 PM, Sen senecajust...@gmail.com wrote:
Has anyone noticed that if you try to browse the Reference section of
developer.android.com, it doesn't let you scroll
Indeed, it's not supported.
JBQ
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Anonymous Anonymous
firewallbr...@googlemail.com wrote:
I think svg is not supported
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 2:06 AM, Mark Murphy mmur...@commonsware.com wrote:
Videoguy wrote:
I have an svg file created in Inkscape app. I am
:10 pm, Jean-Baptiste Queru j...@android.com wrote:
Indeed, it's not supported.
JBQ
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Anonymous Anonymous
firewallbr...@googlemail.com wrote:
I think svg is not supported
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 2:06 AM, Mark Murphy mmur...@commonsware.com
wrote
in every single area, and especially in some of
the Google-proprietary areas like Maps or Market.
JBQ
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 9:57 PM, John Gruenenfelder jo...@as.arizona.edu wrote:
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 11:44:21AM -0800, Jean-Baptiste Queru wrote:
Even if you don't want to trust Google
Those members are private, either because there are other ways to
achieve the same goal, or because they might change in the future in a
what that would break applications that rely on it. I guess that your
situation is the second one.
JBQ
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 8:09 PM, Alger, Lin
Indeed. This was fixed in the source code (it's in the cupcake
development tree) and the fix will be in a future release.
JBQ
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Alec alechol...@gmail.com wrote:
As an update i just raised a bug report on the android bug tracker
writing an application and using the default browser to let the user
browse and download files which will occassionally have square
brackets in. Will there be a browser update any time soon, or do i
need to wait for cupcake for the fix?
Many thanks
Alec
On Mar 4, 12:08 am, Jean-Baptiste
Looks like this question was originally asked in the right forum.
JBQ
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 4:56 AM, Al Sutton a...@funkyandroid.com wrote:
http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Android+Market/thread?fid=5d08f29aeb3d97060004642249d98a40hl=en
Google *really* need to do something about
in to the wild.
Google is beginning to show contempt for the very people they want
supporting the product.
On Feb 18, 1:51 am, Jean-Baptiste Queru j...@android.com wrote:
We're working on having an official 1.1 system image available for the ADP1.
It will not be PLAT-RC33, which is specific
1 - 100 of 287 matches
Mail list logo
