Um... still no news eh. How many of you want to bet that the
finalists are already contacted and we are in the Summer of Slience
equivalence of ADC1?
On Oct 7, 12:13 pm, Lance Nanek lna...@gmail.com wrote:
I recall an email sent during the first challenge where winners of the
first round were
Um... still no news eh. How many of you want to bet that the
finalists are already contacted and we are in the Summer of Slience
equivalence of ADC1?
Everyone will be informed through the blog post. There may not be a
need to inform the selected entries in advance before Round 2. If at
all an
On Oct 6, 10:33 pm, CraigsRace craig...@gmail.com wrote:
Allowing an app update would go against their own rules, so it would
be very controversial. Having said that, IMO, I wouldn't mind if they
did allow it for broken apps only (which I imagine are only a select
few).
It could be argued
Will there be published a list of apps that have continued to round 2
of ADC 2?
Will the participants receive any kind of mail or notification? Or
will everyone have to wait patiently until november?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are
I recall an email sent during the first challenge where winners of the
first round were being given a private SDK and chance to update. It
was frustrating because I'd spent a long time working around bugs in
the GTalk classes and would have loved to have an updated SDK to work
with, even if I
Yes, see the blog post
http://android-developers.blogspot.com/2009/10/adc-2-round-1-scoring-complete.html
--
Carmen
http://www.twitter.com/CarmenDelessio
http://www.talkingandroid.com
http://www.facebook.com/BFFPhoto
http://www.twitter.com/DroidDrop
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 2:12 PM,
I agree it's due to the Donut update that broke quite a few apps there.
Wouldn't surprise me if they allow an app update for the next round.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Android Developers group.
Allowing an app update would go against their own rules, so it would
be very controversial. Having said that, IMO, I wouldn't mind if they
did allow it for broken apps only (which I imagine are only a select
few).
On Oct 7, 5:40 am, Hong lordh...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree it's due to the Donut
Especially for the ones who are left standing!
-John Coryat
Radar Now!
What Zip Code?
On Oct 6, 4:33 pm, CraigsRace craig...@gmail.com wrote:
Allowing an app update would go against their own rules, so it would
be very controversial. Having said that, IMO, I wouldn't mind if they
did
Well, my game appears to work okay under 1.6. But I do have a bug that
I would like to fix before it goes into round 2, assuming it does. I'd
not like to see someone get a chance to slip in bug fixes with a 1.6
fix when I don't have the opportunity to fix my bug.
Rud
I would be extremely happy to have the chance to submit an updated
app, but I agree that it is most fair overall to stick to the original
rules -- no updates.
Seems like Google screwed up quite a bit on this -- either that or it
was a conscious choice to focus on moving forward to 1.6 in
11 matches
Mail list logo
