Yes, but the if/unless attribute checks only if the value is set or not in
this way I will always set the value in the ant call either to my value
true or to ${debug} or have I misunderstood you?
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: den 29 november
On Thu, 29 Nov 2001, Johan Adelöw [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Yes, but the if/unless attribute checks only if the value is set or
not in this way I will always set the value in the ant call either
to my value true or to ${debug} or have I misunderstood you?
I didn't look at your build file and
Quick question: Are you relying on available's back door to changing
property values?
[ ] Yes
No need to reply if the answer is No - I'm just looking for folks that
are.
If yes, could you please elaborate on how/why you are doing so?
And if you don't know what this question refers to,
In reading over the documentation of the antcall task, it seems to
make sense but I wonder at some of the terminology used.
AntCall
Description
Call another target within the same build-file optionally specifying
some properties (param's in this context)
By default, all of the properties
On Thu, 29 Nov 2001, Steve Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Several times within this documentation, the project is referred
to.
It should be something like execution context or similar. You can
execute the same project/buildfile more than once and antcall
executes the given target within a
Hi,
Please pardon my ignorance, but I wonder if you can clarify for me a bit
what you mean by this:
Are you relying on available's back door to changing
property values?
Are you simply asking if people are using available at all? If so, my
answer is yes, most definitely. I have a series of
Yes, you make sense and confirm that it means what I thought it did.
Thank you.
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 8:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: antcall documentation confusion
On Thu, 29 Nov 2001, Steve
I think I prefer it as it is. I was not assuming what you are assuming.
That is presumably why within antcall, properties are referred to as
params.
-Original Message-
From: Peterson, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 9:00 AM
To: 'Ant Users List'
Boy have you let the cat out of the bag now! I never thought about
using the available task this way, the ideas that gives me...
And now you want to remove it?! ;)
--- Erik Hatcher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quick question: Are you relying on available's back door to
changing
property values?
Doh,
Sorry I was such a dummy, I thought about this a little more and figured
out what you were asking. I change my answer to no.
; )
Cheers,
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Matt Lyon
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 9:49 AM
To: Ant Users List
Subject: RE: [POLL] property
Hello,
I'm looking for a converter tool for creating build.xml files based on
JBuilder project files (jpx). AntRunner doesn't support this...
Jens
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If the share is named midas$ (a hidden share), why should it be
renamed?
I had a similar problem. The directory was not hidden though. In my
case, the $$ threw an IOException.
In my case, midas$ is a hidden share and using $$ caused no
problems, (thanks for that Nico). My original
- Original Message -
From: Peterson, Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Ant Users List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 7:00 AM
Subject: RE: antcall documentation confusion
One unfortunate side affect (to me) of the antcall task is that properties
set in the called task
--- Erik Hatcher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For example,
target name=myInit
property name=Me value=IsMe/
/target
target name=showMe
echo message=${Me}/
/target
the above echo will not display any.
These two targets are never executed at the same time. You'd run these
by
I couldn't find any mention of a task object for running Doxygen (searching
Google), so I took a stab at writing one. The work so far is available
here:
http://www.bgw.org/projects/java/ant/
Thanks for your time,
Kyle R. Burton
--
This is more of a VSS question than an ant question. Nevertheless, which
version of VSS are you using? The problem is that if you create two labels
separately, even if they have the same name, they won't be the same label
item. Your best bet is to use a previous build and alter the files
i'm attempting to get my ant script to check out
labeled files from VSS and i'm having a couple of
problems. :) if i label individual files in my
project '2.0' and then try to get '2.0' from VSS i get
the following error:
snip
I don't believe this is an Ant problem at all - it's VSS that
thank you for the reply john.
Nevertheless, which
version of VSS are you using?
VSS 6.0
The problem is that if you create two labels
separately, even if they have the same name, they
won't be the same label
item.
so if i go into each file and individually label them
'2.0' i won't be
Where are checked out to?
It seems the code for this task does not match the documentation, or to
the way stcmd works or to the way I want to work.
If I specify a targetfolder parameter for the task, I want the value of
that parameter to be name of the local folder into which the files at
the
Oops I stand corrected. Thanks Diane. Thats what I get for posting
without trying it first.
I never really use the multiple target command-line feature, and spoke out
of line Sorry for the confusion.
Erik
- Original Message -
From: Diane Holt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ant
Oops, found the problem. A typo in the class name of one of the jvmargs !!
--
Jill
- Original Message -
From: Jill Stephenson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ant Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 4:46 PM
Subject: Starting JBoss from a build file
I am trying to
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 09:47:24AM -0500, Erik Hatcher wrote:
Quick question: Are you relying on available's back door to changing
property values?
There's a backdoor? Cool!! How do I use it?
;)
But seriously, I've never seen a project with greater disparity between
what users want (perl),
It's called OpenSource !
- Original Message -
From: Jeff Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ant Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 4:41 PM
Subject: Re: [POLL] property immutability hacks
But seriously, I've never seen a project with greater disparity between
what
23 matches
Mail list logo
