What would be even better is to just write the code right in the first place
so that no error ever happens. (I tried that. I came close.)
People make mistakes. Server software should do something reasonable. The
problem with just closing the connection is:
- the user will get connection
Patches item #500430, was opened at 2002-01-07 07:48
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=303152aid=500430group_id=3152
Category: other
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: patrick o'leary (pjaol)
Assigned to:
Yes. I am arguing that the server should always return a 500 if it
reaches
the end of a connection with no other results. I don't know the
technical
feasibility of this but it does not seem like correct behavior to return
nothing to the user.
I think the problem is that a filter can
Maybe there needs to be a flag in ns_write and friends to indicate
that something has been written to the connection. If not, send
out a 500 before closing the connection.
To me, this seems like a general error condition not specific to
filters. I imagine (but don't know for a fact) that there
Perhaps ns_atclose might fulfill some of your needs.
Build a preauth filter with a ns_atclose myproc statement in it and myproc
will be executed after everything else just before connection close.
On Monday 07 January 2002 11:14 am, you wrote:
On 2002.01.07, Jim Wilcoxson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2002.01.07, David Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps ns_atclose might fulfill some of your needs.
Build a preauth filter with a ns_atclose myproc statement in it and myproc
will be executed after everything else just before connection close.
Registering a script with ns_atclose won't
hmm. Under Linux I issued a ns_write command from a procedure called by
ns_atclose and the output was appended to the previous ns_write output and
displayed in my browser.
The docs don't actually specify whether it should take place before or after
the connection close.
On Monday 07 January
Totally agree. In fact, I think there may be other cases where AS 3.4
doesn't log Bad Request errors that are internally generated by AS. I
have had users do screen shots of Bad Request, yet I can't find them
in my logs. Could be stupidity on my part...dunno yet.
Jim
I can confirm that
as a chroot alternative it should very good. I'm not aware of any way to
access the parent machine from the virtual machine.
as a virtual server it might perform well if you give each vmware machine a
dedicated partition and load up on memory (if you assign 128mb or whatever to
a virtual
On 2002.01.07, David Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hmm. Under Linux I issued a ns_write command from a procedure called by
ns_atclose and the output was appended to the previous ns_write output and
displayed in my browser.
The docs don't actually specify whether it should take place before
I think a href=http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/;User-Mode Linux
(UML)/a is probably the best chroot alternative for Linux. On BSDs, I
imagine jail is better.
On Monday, January 7, 2002, at 12:57 PM, Jerry Asher wrote:
I do wonder how well it might work as a chroot alternative.
Hello.
I've written a small C based daemon listening on 999 port. It doesn't do
much, but I want to move some of the functions from C to TCL.
I'm using Ns_SockListenCallback() and have SOCKET to work with. How do I
allow Tcl to use this socket?
--
WK
If you're creating the socket in your C module using Tcl channels, I think
you just need to get the socket id back and use the standard puts, gets and
so on.
If you aren't using Tcl channels, you'll need to create your own Tcl
commands and use them to read/write bytes.
See nsopenssl for an
This is a small ab test on VMware 3.0 on Windows on P3/850 and a P3/600:
Server Software:AOLserver/3.4 -- this is the P3/600
Server Hostname:www.zoro.tcl.pl
Server Port:80
Document Path: /ab/ab.adp
Document Length:12 bytes
Concurrency Level:
Folks, with AOLserver 3.3+ad13 on Solaris (SunOS 5.*), in my own
loadable module, I have a Tcl command implemented in C that creates a
new ns_set and then does stuff with it, pretty much like this:
setPtr = Ns_SetCreate(TclReceiveDataCmd);
/* Do more C stuff - stick data into the set, etc.
The OpenACS system implements a filter manager, ad_register_filter, that
sits on top of ns_register_filter and lets you set a priority number for
each filter you register with it. The master filter (registered with
ns_register_filter) applies each registered filter in turn in the order you
On 2002.01.07, Dave Siktberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You could use such a feature to force the order of trace filters.
Perhaps that would address your need.
I already said that trace filters aren't what I need. Trace
filters are executed too late. Unless I'm wrong. My testing
a while back
+-- On Jan 7, Andrew Piskorski said:
Problem is, I'm sometimes getting a segfault during the malloc in the
Ns_SetCreate (see below), and I don't understand why. Could someone
give me advice on this, please? Thanks!
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 02:42:14PM -0600, Rob Mayoff wrote:
Looks like heap corruption. You are probably writing past the end
of a block, or writing to a freed block, or freeing a block twice
some time before this call.
Eeps. Any suggestions on how best to track down where in my code I'm
19 matches
Mail list logo
