Re: [AOLSERVER] recent updates

2011-10-26 Thread Daniël Mantione
Op Tue, 25 Oct 2011, schreef Jeff Rogers: I'll take a swing at getting this integrated sometime soon (available time waxes and wanes, as I'm sure it does for all of us). This patch is a bigger piece of functionality that the others I put in; I think 4.6 is the right target for this. Yup,

Re: [AOLSERVER] recent updates

2011-10-25 Thread Jim Davidson
Hi, Cool! Nice updates :) On the version # question a few days back, I agree this is 4.x update. For a 5.x release, in addition to what you listed below, I'd add: -- integrate SSL support directly (comm driver, api's) -- integrate the comm drivers -- figure out some better build environment

Re: [AOLSERVER] recent updates

2011-10-25 Thread Daniël Mantione
Op Tue, 25 Oct 2011, schreef Jim Davidson: Hi, Cool! Nice updates :) On the version # question a few days back, I agree this is 4.x update. For a 5.x release, in addition to what you listed below, I'd add: -- integrate SSL support directly (comm driver, api's) -- integrate the comm

Re: [AOLSERVER] recent updates

2011-10-25 Thread Jim Davidson
Good catch -- trying to get IP6 working makes sense as well. -Jim On Oct 25, 2011, at 3:54 PM, Daniël Mantione wrote: Op Tue, 25 Oct 2011, schreef Jim Davidson: Hi, Cool! Nice updates :) On the version # question a few days back, I agree this is 4.x update. For a 5.x

Re: [AOLSERVER] recent updates

2011-10-25 Thread Jeff Rogers
Daniël Mantione wrote: Maybe I could point again at the ipv6 patch I wrote in 2008. Back there was even not even a response on this list, but maybe today, now the world has run out of ipv4 addresses, the interrest in serving ipv6 is a bit higher. Patch still available for download here:

[AOLSERVER] recent updates

2011-10-19 Thread Jeff Rogers
Hey all, me again. For those of you who don't monitor the commits list I wanted to share a few changes I've recently made as well as a few I'm still thinking about. - implemented native decoding of strings in ns_returnfile. This allows filenames that are not utf-8 to be passed, similar to

Re: [AOLSERVER] recent updates

2011-10-19 Thread Fenton, Brian
for the project. best wishes Brian From: AOLserver Discussion [AOLSERVER@LISTSERV.AOL.COM] On Behalf Of Jeff Rogers [dv...@diphi.com] Sent: 19 October 2011 06:45 To: AOLSERVER@LISTSERV.AOL.COM Subject: [AOLSERVER] recent updates Hey all, me again. For those

Re: [AOLSERVER] recent updates

2011-10-19 Thread Brett Schwarz
still need it can load it? Thanks for your effort.      --brett From: Jeff Rogers dv...@diphi.com To: AOLSERVER@LISTSERV.AOL.COM Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2011 10:45 PM Subject: [AOLSERVER] recent updates Hey all, me again. For those of you who don't monitor

Re: [AOLSERVER] recent updates

2011-10-19 Thread Andrew Piskorski
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 05:09:48PM +0100, Fenton, Brian wrote: A new AOLserver release would be amazing, but maybe seeing as 4.0 was first released 8 years ago, we could consider that it's about time for a move to 5.0? I guess he should just bump the version number up to 9.0 then, that'd look

Re: [AOLSERVER] recent updates

2011-10-19 Thread Rusty Brooks
On Oct 19, 2011, at 6:51 PM, Andrew Piskorski wrote: On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 05:09:48PM +0100, Fenton, Brian wrote: A new AOLserver release would be amazing, but maybe seeing as 4.0 was first released 8 years ago, we could consider that it's about time for a move to 5.0? I guess he

Re: [AOLSERVER] recent updates

2011-10-19 Thread Jeff Rogers
Fenton, Brian wrote: Hi Jeff congrats on all the great work. That all sounds super. A new AOLserver release would be amazing, but maybe seeing as 4.0 was first released 8 years ago, we could consider that it's about time for a move to 5.0? Not wanting to get too Firefox-y about it, but I think

Re: [AOLSERVER] recent updates

2011-10-19 Thread Jeff Rogers
Brett Schwarz wrote: I'll grab the latest and greatest from SF and start messing around with your changes. Is SF the main repo for aolserver? What about the modules (specifically nspostgres)? Yep, SF is still the place for aolserver and nspostgres (which looks like it has been updated to