Re: [Apertium-stuff] Proposal: A Research in Semantic Domains and Arabic Collocations

Hi Anas, I am happy to help you, I am a native Arabic speaker and also working as an academic. Let me know more about your work. Sevilay On Sat, Jan 29, 2022 at 3:16 PM wrote: > Dear sirs, > > I'm interested in submitting a doctoral thesis in semantic domains, and > Arabic collocations,

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Proposal for Torwali-Urdu translation pair

Thanks, I'll check'em out. On Fri, Apr 5, 2019, 7:05 PM Memduh Gökırmak wrote: > Hi Naeem, > > A few points that come to mind are: > > 1) We need 90% coverage or above for release quality. > > 2) We have an Urdu analyzer but not a Torwali one, so you will have to > develop a Torwali analyzer. >

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Proposal for Torwali-Urdu translation pair

Hi Naeem, A few points that come to mind are: 1) We need 90% coverage or above for release quality. 2) We have an Urdu analyzer but not a Torwali one, so you will have to develop a Torwali analyzer. 3) Can Inam or someone else provide a structured file of Torwali-Urdu words? 4) Do we have

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Proposal

   >     <mailto:il...@selimcan.org >         <mailto:il...@selimcan.org>>> >     >     > *Sent:* Thursday, March 21, 2019 >     9:09:07 PM >     >     > *To:* >    

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Proposal

;>>> password. Can >>>>>>> > > you please check it one more time? >>>>>>> > Hey Daniyar, >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Now it should be in your inbox/spam folder. >>>>>>> > >>&g

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Proposal

>>>>> password. Can >>>>>> > > you please check it one more time? >>>>>> > Hey Daniyar, >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Now it should be in your inbox/spam folder. >>>>>&

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Proposal

> >>>>> > Now it should be in your inbox/spam folder. >>>>> > >>>>> > The username is slightly different. >>>>> > >>>>> > Sorry about that. >>>>> > >>>>> > I.

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Proposal

t;> > The username is slightly different. >>>> > >>>> > Sorry about that. >>>> > >>>> > I. >>>> > > >>>> > > username: nariman9119 >>&g

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Proposal

lis.ru <mailto:n.dani...@innopolis.ru> >>> > > >>> > > >>> > >>> >>> > > *From:* Ilnar Salimzianov >> > <mailto:il...@selimcan.org>> >

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Proposal

t; > > >> > > >> > >> ------------ >> > > *From:* Ilnar Salimzianov > > <mailto:il...@selimcan.org>> >> > > *Sent:* Thursday, March 21, 2019 9:09:07 PM >

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Proposal

> > I. > > > > > > username: nariman9119 > > > > > > mail: n.dani...@innopolis.ru <mailto:n.dani...@innopolis.ru> > > > > > > > > > > > > *From:* Ilnar Salimzianov > <mailto:il...@seli

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Proposal

    > *From:* Ilnar Salimzianov     <mailto:il...@selimcan.org>> >     > *Sent:* Thursday, March 21, 2019 9:09:07 PM >     > *To:* apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net >     <mailto:apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net> >     > *Subject:* Re: [Apertium

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Proposal

--- > > *From:* Ilnar Salimzianov > > *Sent:* Thursday, March 21, 2019 9:09:07 PM > > *To:* apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net > > *Subject:* Re: [Apertium-stuff] Proposal > > > > > &

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Proposal

> > *From:* Ilnar Salimzianov > > *Sent:* Thursday, March 21, 2019 9:09:07 PM > > *To:* apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net > > *Subject:* Re: [Apertium-stuff] Proposal > > > > > > On 3/

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Proposal

at. I. > > username: nariman9119 > > mail: n.dani...@innopolis.ru > > > *From:* Ilnar Salimzianov > *Sent:* Thursday, March 21, 2019 9:09:07 PM > *To:* apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net > *Sub

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Proposal

@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Apertium-stuff] Proposal On 3/21/19 5:15 PM, Mohit Raj wrote: > hi all > could anyone please guide me to create account on Apertium Wiki > Hi Mohit! Which username would you like to have on the wiki? Ilnar (selimcan on IRC) > On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 1:13

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Proposal

On 3/21/19 5:15 PM, Mohit Raj wrote: > hi all > could anyone please guide me to create account on Apertium Wiki > Hi Mohit! Which username would you like to have on the wiki? Ilnar (selimcan on IRC) > On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 1:13 AM Mohit Raj > wrote: > >     Hi

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Proposal

hi all could anyone please guide me to create account on Apertium Wiki On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 1:13 AM Mohit Raj wrote: > Hi Hector > > There are many literature and published magzines are available and Magahi > is introduced at higher secondary level as optional subject in related > education

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Proposal

Hi Hector There are many literature and published magzines are available and Magahi is introduced at higher secondary level as optional subject in related education board of state. Thanks On Wed, 20 Mar 2019, 21:03 Hèctor Alòs i Font, wrote: > Hi Mohit, > Magahi seems an excellent choice for

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Proposal

Hi Mohit, Magahi seems an excellent choice for Apertium, as an under-resourced language, but I wonder only about how much is it standardised. Could you clarify? Hèctor El dc., 20 març 2019, 17.20, Mohit Raj va escriure: > Got it > > On Wed, 20 Mar 2019, 16:52 Sevilay Bayatlı, > wrote: > >>

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Proposal

Got it On Wed, 20 Mar 2019, 16:52 Sevilay Bayatlı, wrote: > Hi, > > here how to start > http://wiki.apertium.org/wiki/Getting_started_with_induction_tools, also > you have to get Apertium wiki account to write your proposal. > > best, > > Sevilay > > > On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 12:52 PM Mohit Raj

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Proposal

Hi, here how to start http://wiki.apertium.org/wiki/Getting_started_with_induction_tools, also you have to get Apertium wiki account to write your proposal. best, Sevilay On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 12:52 PM Mohit Raj wrote: > Hi all, > Here is my proposal for GSOC. > > I am Mohit Raj, doing my

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Proposal: Move Apertium to Github

Hi Hector (and any others who would like to continue using SVN commands), I've touched on this previously on this list but I think it's quite important so I'll mention it again. GitHub's SVN bridge (which neither GitLab nor Bitbucket have a free equivalent for), lets you continue using SVN for

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Proposal: Move Apertium to Github

2018-02-16 9:13 GMT+03:00 Francis Tyers : > El 2018-02-14 01:38, Shardul Chiplunkar escribió: > >> Thanks for your comments. >> >> Felipe, I have tried to respond to your comment on the proposal page. >> Please let us know if you have further questions. >> >> It seems that

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Proposal: Move Apertium to Github

Hi folks this is suraj tamgale. i am second year computer science student. i would like to work on a project in Gsoc18.can somebody help me finding an issue so i can start contributing for apertium. or i would love to work for the proposal of moving apertium to github. On Sun, Feb 4, 2018 at 5:33

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Proposal: Move Apertium to Github

El 2018-02-14 01:38, Shardul Chiplunkar escribió: Thanks for your comments. Felipe, I have tried to respond to your comment on the proposal page. Please let us know if you have further questions. It seems that making the repository read-only and later deleting it is the best option then. As

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Proposal: Move Apertium to Github

Thanks for your comments. Felipe, I have tried to respond to your comment on the proposal page. Please let us know if you have further questions. It seems that making the repository read-only and later deleting it is the best option then. As Fran and Xavi said, we would go through the wiki

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Proposal: Move Apertium to Github

El 2018-02-13 11:23, Francis Tyers escribió: El 2018-02-13 10:40, Xavi Ivars escribió: 2018-02-13 10:16 GMT+01:00 Francis Tyers : Both of these are horrible. So I propose that we just make it read-only for a year and then delete it. In the meantime the migration crew

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Proposal: Move Apertium to Github

El 2018-02-13 10:40, Xavi Ivars escribió: 2018-02-13 10:16 GMT+01:00 Francis Tyers : Both of these are horrible. So I propose that we just make it read-only for a year and then delete it. In the meantime the migration crew (you, Sushain, others) will have the

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Proposal: Move Apertium to Github

2018-02-13 10:16 GMT+01:00 Francis Tyers : > >> > Both of these are horrible. So I propose that we just make it read-only > for a year and then delete it. > > In the meantime the migration crew (you, Sushain, others) will have the > responsibility of fixing the ~1000 links on

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Proposal: Move Apertium to Github

El 2018-02-13 03:54, Shardul Chiplunkar escribió: Hi everyone, We've now written all the scripts required for the migration. The scripts and documentation are available here: https://github.com/sushain97/apertium-on-github The only issue remaining is of backwards compatibility with the

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Proposal: Move Apertium to Github

Hi everyone, We've now written all the scripts required for the migration. The scripts and documentation are available here: https://github.com/sushain97/apertium-on-github The only issue remaining is of backwards compatibility with the SourceForge repository. Due to the technical details of

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Proposal: Move Apertium to Github (listing a git repository)

:35:17 +0100 > > From: Xavi Ivars <x...@infobenissa.com> > > To: apertium-stuff <apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net> > > Reply-To: apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net > > Subject: Re: [Apertium-stuff] Proposal: Move Apertium to Github > > Pièce(s) joint

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Proposal: Move Apertium to Github (listing a git repository)

> Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2018 00:35:17 +0100 > From: Xavi Ivars <x...@infobenissa.com> > To: apertium-stuff <apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net> > Reply-To: apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [Apertium-stuff] Proposal: Move Apertium to Github > Pièce(s

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Proposal: Move Apertium to Github

Hi Bernard, Xavi has covered a lot of points that you were asking about. I'd just like to add a few more. First: Github offers an SVN bridge. This means that if we shift to Github, developers who want to continue using SVN can use all the same SVN commands and workflows as before. The only

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Proposal: Move Apertium to Github

Hi Bernard I'll try to summarize the answers for your main concerns. If I'm not answering an specific question, please let me know and I'll try to make sure it gets covered. The proposal is to move both to GitHub and git, for several reasons explained in the wiki page. Regarding your concerns

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Proposal: Move Apertium to Github

> Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2018 16:03:48 -0800 > From: Shardul Chiplunkar > To: apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net, > apertium-pmc > Reply-To: apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: [Apertium-stuff] Proposal: Move Apertium to Github >

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Proposal: Move Apertium to Github

If the licence of hosting platform is a big concern, then we can host the code in gitlab and set an autosync with GitHub for the visibility reasons Personally I don't think it is a big concern since current host sourceforge isn't open source On Tuesday, February 6, 2018, Shardul Chiplunkar <

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Proposal: Move Apertium to Github

Hi everyone, Thanks for your inputs. Sergio: > move all the existing user base with minimal impact (how to announce, how > to contact users, how to switch off the old repos, etc.) This is a very valid concern. We have updated the wiki page for the proposal with a brief outline of how we would

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Proposal: Move Apertium to Github

Hi Benedikt, Thank you for your reply. You raise a good question regarding the preservation of emails in a transition to Git. Fortunately, in managing the Apertium packages for various platforms, Tino has also has put together a correspondence between SVN users and emails. The import scripts

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Proposal: Move Apertium to Github

One not so unimportant issue that I do not see mentioned anywhere is E-mail addresses. While svn only maintains a simple user name, git requires user name + E-mail address. Tools like git-svn will only create a dummy address (user@repository-hash or something like that). When reactos moved to

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Proposal: Move Apertium to Github

[Replies inline] On Sat, 3 Feb 2018 16:03:48 -0800 Shardul Chiplunkar wrote: > There is a new proposal to the PMC to move Apertium to Github: > http://wiki.apertium.org/wiki/PMC_proposals/Move_Apertium_to_Github Yay, thanks :-) As some of you probably know, I've

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Proposal: Move Apertium to Github

Hi folks, Thanks for your input both via email and on the proposal page. Shardul and I have responded to a number of questions on the proposal including Mikel's. We're happy to field any remaining questions and are particularly curious to hear from the remainder of the PMC. Thank you to those

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Proposal: Move Apertium to Github

El 2018-02-04 13:41, Tino Didriksen escribió: On 4 February 2018 at 01:03, Shardul Chiplunkar wrote: There is a new proposal to the PMC to move Apertium to Github: http://wiki.apertium.org/wiki/PMC_proposals/Move_Apertium_to_Github [1] I'm in favour. If we

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Proposal: Move Apertium to Github

On 4 February 2018 at 01:03, Shardul Chiplunkar < shardul.chiplun...@gmail.com> wrote: > There is a new proposal to the PMC to move Apertium to Github: > http://wiki.apertium.org/wiki/PMC_proposals/Move_Apertium_to_Github > I'm in favour. If we move to git (Github, Gitlab, whatever), we should

Re: [Apertium-stuff] proposal feedback?

Irene, I have made a few comments on the Google Doc attached to your proposal in the Google Summer of Code site. Please check them there. Mikel El 02/04/17 a les 19:24, Irene Tang ha escrit: hi, could i get some feedback on my project proposal / work plan?

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Proposal for Google Summer Of Code 2014

Divya, you have to submit it through Google Melange! Cheers Mikel Al 03/21/2014 06:33 PM, En/na Divya Upadhyay ha escrit: *Name:* Divya Upadhyay *E-mail address:* divyaupadhya...@gmail.com mailto:divyaupadhya...@gmail.com *Other information that may be useful to contact you: * *E-mail

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Proposal for Fuzzy-match repair from Translation Memory

Any feedback anyone ? On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 4:56 AM, Pankaj Kumar Sharma sharmapankaj1...@gmail.com wrote: Hello everyone, After discussions with Mikel and some other community members, I've created a proposal for above mentioned topic. The proposal could be found here:

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Proposal for Fuzzy-match repair from Translation Memory

Al 03/21/2014 06:46 PM, En/na Pankaj Kumar Sharma ha escrit: Any feedback anyone ? Dozens of proposals and many coming in right now before the deadline and a handful of mentors struggling to deal with them. Please understand if they cannot make it... Mikel -- Mikel L. Forcada

Re: [Apertium-stuff] proposal page of sphinx

Sphinx, add it to this page: http://wiki.apertium.org/wiki/Category:GSoC_2013_Student_proposals where the other proposals are. Apertiumers: I can't find it. What would be a suitable coding challenge for a new, but related language pair? Mikel Al 04/28/2013 09:37 AM, En/na sphinx jiang ha

Re: [Apertium-stuff] proposal page of sphinx

On 28 April 2013 08:37, sphinx jiang yishan...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, This is my original proposal page of GSOC, maybe something need to be modified, so publish now to get some advise~~

Re: [Apertium-stuff] proposal for change to .lrx format

2012/10/8 Mikel Forcada m...@dlsi.ua.es http://pastebin.com/GGzfM5qc Calling a list would just involve putting it's contents in the rule. So with or it would work like an OR, but without, it would work like a sequence. I don't like this at all. This is very opaque. I would not use the

Re: [Apertium-stuff] proposal for change to .lrx format

El dl 08 de 10 de 2012 a les 07:04 +0200, en/na Mikel Forcada va escriure: Fran, I'd like to include the possibility for lists in the LRX format. This would involve adding a couple of new tags, That should not be a problem as long as the old format works in the new definition and

Re: [Apertium-stuff] proposal for change to .lrx format

El dl 08 de 10 de 2012 a les 07:50 +0200, en/na Kevin Brubeck Unhammer va escriure: Mikel Forcada m...@dlsi.ua.es writes: Fran, I'd like to include the possibility for lists in the LRX format. This would involve adding a couple of new tags, That should not be a problem as long as

Re: [Apertium-stuff] proposal for change to .lrx format

Mikel Forcada m...@dlsi.ua.es writes: Fran, I'd like to include the possibility for lists in the LRX format. This would involve adding a couple of new tags, That should not be a problem as long as the old format works in the new definition and changing the root tag, You would have to

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Proposal: don't prefix paths in apertium-gen-modes (but prefix dirname $0 to PATH in apertium)

Jacob Nordfalk jacob.nordf...@gmail.com writes: Hi there! As no objections have been raised I think we can conclude that this proposal has PASSED :-) Unhammer, could apply your patch to the SVN trunk ? Jacob Committed revision 38346. 2012/3/27 Stephen Tigner stephen.tig...@gmail.com

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Proposal: don't prefix paths in apertium-gen-modes (but prefix dirname $0 to PATH in apertium)

2012/3/26 Stephen Tigner stephen.tig...@gmail.com On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Jacob Nordfalk jacob.nordf...@gmail.com wrote: Its not that clear from the code diff, but the idea is first to look for the commands in the installation dir, then on the general PATH:

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Proposal: don't prefix paths in apertium-gen-modes (but prefix dirname $0 to PATH in apertium)

Stephen Tigner stephen.tig...@gmail.com writes: On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Jacob Nordfalk jacob.nordf...@gmail.com wrote: +1 for the proposal. 2012/3/24 Stephen Tigner stephen.tig...@gmail.com I think I'm gonna need to read that again a few times to see if that'd affect the Java

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Proposal: don't prefix paths in apertium-gen-modes (but prefix dirname $0 to PATH in apertium)

On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Jacob Nordfalk jacob.nordf...@gmail.com wrote: 2012/3/26 Stephen Tigner stephen.tig...@gmail.com [snip] Ah, okay, so I'm assuming APERTIUM_PATH is an environment variable? Sorry, it wasnt clear (again - Unhammer, your'e fired as ghost writer :-).

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Proposal: don't prefix paths in apertium-gen-modes (but prefix dirname $0 to PATH in apertium)

El dv 23 de 03 de 2012 a les 12:23 +0100, en/na Kevin Brubeck Unhammer va escriure: Currently, a modes file looks like this: /usr/local/bin/lt-proc -w /usr/local/bin/nb-nn.automorf-no-cp.bin|/usr/local/bin/cg-proc -w /usr/local/bin/nb-nn.rlx.bin|/usr/local/bin/apertium-tagger -g $2

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Proposal: don't prefix paths in apertium-gen-modes (but prefix dirname $0 to PATH in apertium)

+1 for the proposal. 2012/3/24 Stephen Tigner stephen.tig...@gmail.com I think I'm gonna need to read that again a few times to see if that'd affect the Java runtime at all, Unhammer is actually writing this as a result of a discussion I started on IRC on the occasion that I didnt like

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Proposal: don't prefix paths in apertium-gen-modes (but prefix dirname $0 to PATH in apertium)

I think I'm gonna need to read that again a few times to see if that'd affect the Java runtime at all, but I thought I'd at least pitch in with an explanation of how the Java runtime currently handles .mode files. When the Java runtime is invoked, it's given a data directory as a command-line

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Proposal: alpha releases/'staging' area in SVN

On 8 February 2011 15:02, Francis Tyers fty...@prompsit.com wrote: El dt 08 de 02 de 2011 a les 14:53 +, en/na Jimmy O'Regan va escriure: That's the problem, though. If we want feedback, saying 'get it from SVN' really reduces the amount of people who /can/ give us feedback. Hmm, I

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Proposal: alpha releases/'staging' area in SVN

2011/2/8 Gema Ramírez-Sánchez grami...@gmail.com: So, correct if wrong... Oh. Yeah. I guess we both forgot when we came to a compromise[1] that we should update the status... [1] If Fran and I can compromise on something, there's hope for Palestine and Israel.  TRUNK: would contain pairs in

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Proposal: alpha releases/'staging' area in SVN

On 8 February 2011 21:30, Kevin Brubeck Unhammer unham...@fsfe.org wrote: Gema Ramírez-Sánchez grami...@gmail.com writes: I like the idea in general, how should we go ahead? making a proposal and submitting it to the PMC? Agreed. I like the idea too. Having pairs that are a little testvoc