Title: Re: [Assam] Demand note is ULFA's: IGP (SB)
Sentinel
Parallel govts
must have its own accountability.
*** Only problem here is that Xogunor xawt burha
goru nomore
At 11:14 AM -0600 1/20/06, Rajen Barua wrote:
I think if ULFA would come up with a solid plan how to
spend that 5
Title: Re: [Assam] Demand note is ULFA's: IGP (SB) Sentinel
Can we say the same for GOI
accountability?
Or the rule does not apply
there?
RB
- Original Message -
From:
Chan
Mahanta
To: Rajen Barua ; Ram Sarangapani
Cc: ASSAMNET
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 11:35
Sarangapani [EMAIL PROTECTED] *To:* Barua25
[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Cc:* ASSAMNET assam@assamnet.org ; Chan Mahanta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Sent:* Wednesday, January 18, 2006 11:25 PM *Subject:* Re: [Assam] Demand note is ULFA's: IGP (SB) SentinelHeh! heh! Barua, that is yet another explanation
Title: Re: [Assam] Demand note is ULFA's: IGP (SB) Sentinel
Is ULFA not even accountable to the
people of Assam whom they claim to represent in their demand of independence for
Assam?
RB
- Original Message -
From:
Chan
Mahanta
To: Rajen Barua ; Ram Sarangapani
Cc
uary 18, 2006 11:25 PM
Subject: Re: [Assam] Demand note is ULFA's: IGP (SB) Sentinel
Heh! heh! Barua, that is yet another explanation for the faux pas.
The idea seems to put the onus on the GOI. But who knows?
On 1/18/06, Barua25 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
"Be that as it may, the dema
se people are saying NO to Hobo Diok.
They are saying : Amar Upai Nai.
RB
- Original Message -
From: Ram Sarangapani
To: Barua25
Cc: ASSAMNET ; Chan Mahanta
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 11:25 PM
Subject: Re: [Assam] Demand note is ULFA's: IGP (SB) Sentinel
Heh! heh! Barua,
Title: Re: [Assam] Demand note is ULFA's: IGP (SB)
Sentinel
but shouldn't they be accountable to
at least the downtrodden, whom Ulfa obviously champions?
*** And HOW do RS and RB get to don the halo of championing the
cause of those who have kept ULFA operating for a quarter century
Title: Re: [Assam] Demand note is ULFA's: IGP (SB) Sentinel
ULFA represents those who support them, not who oppose them
If they donot represent the whole
people of Assam, how do they plan to negotiate with GOI?
Do they have a list of supporters
to show to the GOI?
And how do you know thatI
Title: Re: [Assam] Demand note is ULFA's: IGP (SB)
Sentinel
Geography, my friend! High school geography! Look it up. There is
more to Assam than Guwahati.
At 10:36 PM -0600 1/20/06, Barua25 wrote:
ULFA fights not JUST for the poor and
the downtrodden, but a lot of middle class people who
Title: Re: [Assam] Demand note is ULFA's: IGP (SB)
Sentinel
Borphukon of
Jorhat.
*** I didn't realize your first name was Badan:-).
ULFA represents those who support
them, not who oppose them
If they donot represent the whole people of Assam, how
do they plan to negotiate with GOI?
Do
Sarangapani[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Cc:* ASSAMNET assam@assamnet.org
*Sent:* Friday, January 20, 2006 11:35 AM
*Subject:* Re: [Assam] Demand note is ULFA's: IGP
(SB) Sentinel
Parallel govts must have its own accountability.
*** Only problem here is that Xogunor xawt
burha
;
Chan Mahanta
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 11:25 PM
Subject: Re: [Assam] Demand note is ULFA's: IGP (SB) Sentinel
Heh! heh! Barua, that is yet another explanation for the faux pas.
The idea seems to put the onus on the GOI. But who knows?
On 1/18/06, Barua25 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
al Message -
From:
Ram Sarangapani
To: mc mahant
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; assam@assamnet.org
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 11:31
PM
Subject: Re: [Assam] Demand note is
ULFA's: IGP (SB) Sentinel
MM da,
Actual settlement-
since '47 -in $$ account will
Title: Re: [Assam] Demand note is ULFA's: IGP (SB)
Sentinel
At 10:14 PM -0600 1/18/06, Barua25 wrote:
1: ULFA did not ask MRG , nor does
MRG pretend, to speak or negotiate
on
behalf of ULFA.
Is not MRG in the PCG Group which was formed by ULFA
of 'like minded' people?
Does it not imply
Title: Re: [Assam] Demand note is ULFA's: IGP (SB) Sentinel
You seem to be very much worried at
my statement.
But you did not answer my
question.
Is MRG a member of
PCG?
RB
- Original Message -
From:
Chan
Mahanta
To: ASSAMNET ; Barua25
Sent: Thursday, January 19
Sarangapani ;
Roy, Santanu
Cc: Rajen Barua ;
ASSAMNET ; Chan Mahanta
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 8:00 PM
Subject: Re: [Assam] Demand note is ULFA's: IGP (SB) Sentinel
O' Ram:
I just want to put a few things in perspective here:
1: ULFA did not ask MRG , nor does MRG pretend, to speak
: Re: [Assam] Demand note is ULFA's: IGP (SB) Sentinel
At 10:14 PM -0600 1/18/06, Barua25 wrote:
1: ULFA did not ask MRG , nor does MRG pretend, to speak or negotiate
on behalf of ULFA.
Is not MRG in the PCG Group which was formed by ULFA of 'like minded' people?
Does it not imply that MRG
Ramda,
Perhaps the message from MRG is that peace is
paramount. And if that means the government has to
condone extortion and continue with dialog, so be it.
I don't know whether she supports ULFA's programs and
policies - C'Da says she does not. But from what
little I have read in the Indian
Rajib,
Perhaps the message from MRG is that peace is paramount.
Maybe thats what she is after and thats what she meant.
And if that means the government has to condone extortion and continue with dialog, so be it.
So, now for the sake of peace, we should condone something that is wrong.
Title: Re: [Assam] Demand note is ULFA's: IGP (SB)
Sentinel
it wasbelieved whats right is right and whats wrong is
wrong.
*** That is a rather simple-minded view Ram.
Maybe I am too naive to understand all this.
*** May be. Maybe that is where you are losing it :-).
At 11:27 AM
C'da
*** That is a rather simple-minded view Ram.
Of course it is. In all these cacophonous discussions, sometimes the simple truth is lost.
Are there shades of whats right and whats wrong?
*** May be. Maybe that is where you are losing it :-).
But then, I would have the most important
Title: Re: [Assam] Demand note is ULFA's: IGP (SB)
Sentinel
What we badly
needsomething in the middle for the people which will be
pro-Assam.
*** Why? What seems to the matter with the one beholden to and
made in the image of the GoI one?
Can you explain?
If something is the matter
Title: Re: [Assam] Demand note is ULFA's: IGP (SB)
Sentinel
Ram:
Are there shades of whats right and whats wrong?
*** I don't want to insult your intelligence by telling you. I
like to think, YOU do know the right answer, even though it is not
always convenient to acknowledge it. More so when
Hi Rajib:
- C'Da says she does not.
*** I wrote:
1: ULFA did not ask MRG , nor does MRG pretend, to speak or negotiate
on behalf of ULFA.
I had little reason to doubt your ability to read and comprehend
simple English thus far. But from the above comment, I wonder if you
have not caught
Title: Re: [Assam] Demand note is ULFA's: IGP (SB) Sentinel
*** Why?
for the people which will be
pro-Assam
If something is the matter with it, then how would you go about
getting that something in the middle?
For this we are hoping and Tarun
Gogoi and ULFA will make some room
Title: Re: [Assam] Demand note is ULFA's: IGP (SB)
Sentinel
At 3:52 PM -0600 1/19/06, Rajen Barua wrote:
*** Why?
for the people which will be
pro-Assam
*** Huh?
If something is the matter with it,
then how would you go about getting that something in the
middle?
For this we are hoping
Title: Re: [Assam] Demand note is ULFA's: IGP (SB) Sentinel
We have two govts, ULFA and GOA,
running the show parallely for decades without any output.
People are saying, that is
enough.
Hobo Diok.
RB
- Original Message -
From:
Chan
Mahanta
To: Rajen Barua ; ASSAMNET
Title: Re: [Assam] Demand note is ULFA's: IGP (SB)
Sentinel
Heh-heh-heh!
So MRG too is one of the bad-guys now?
GoI can mouth off peace mantras, frothing in the mouth about how
there is no problem that could not be resolved with 'democracy', while
hunting down ULFA, without nary a whimper
Title: Re: [Assam] Demand note is ULFA's: IGP (SB) Sentinel
"Since the ULFA has neither admitted nor
denied the issuance of the demand note to the ONGC, it is too early to
draw a conclusion on the authenticity of the
letter.
It may be because MMGis
awriter, who by nature of her
BIG TIME.
And Chandan already said, GOI will not be THE looser.
Upai Nai!!
RB
- Original Message -
From: Chan Mahanta
To: Ram Sarangapani ;
ASSAMNET
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 2:25 PM
Subject: Re: [Assam] Demand note is ULFA's: IGP (SB) Sentinel
Heh-heh-heh!
So MRG too
is
ULFA's: IGP (SB) Sentinel
C'da
So MRG too is one of the bad-guys now?
Bad 'guy', I don't know, but biased, definitely. She would be jumping up
and down, and raising hellif the shoes were on the GOI.
Incidently, why is she referred to as the 'negotiator'? Why not call
)Sentinel
Re: [Assam] Demand note is ULFA's: IGP (SB) SentinelSince the ULFA has
neither admitted nor denied the issuance of the demand note to the ONGC, it is
too early to draw a conclusion on the authenticity of the letter.
It may be because MMG is a writer, who by nature of her tribe
for?
And Chandan has already declared that Assam will be the looser.
RB
- Original Message -
From: Ram Sarangapani
To: Chan Mahanta
Cc: ASSAMNET
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 2:44 PM
Subject: Re: [Assam] Demand note is ULFA's: IGP (SB) Sentinel
C'da
So MRG too is one of the bad
Idon't see the point of hitting out at Mamoni-baideu just because she did not condemn the ULFA for the note received by some bloody oil sucking organization She is not the ULFA, nor their point-man. She is not a cop. It is not her job to make balanced political statements,
Is it her job to make
note is ULFA's: IGP (SB)Sentinel
Re: [Assam] Demand note is ULFA's: IGP (SB) SentinelSince the ULFA has
neither admitted nor denied the issuance of the demand note to the ONGC, it
is too early to draw a conclusion on the authenticity of the letter.
It may be because MMG is a writer, who
is not the American president at Camp
David.
-Original Message-
From: Ram Sarangapani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu 1/19/2006 7:40 AM
To: Roy, Santanu
Cc: Rajen Barua; ASSAMNET; Chan Mahanta
Subject: Re: [Assam] Demand note is ULFA's: IGP (SB) Sentinel
What is this politics
that she is indulging in? Can you
explain? -Original Message- From: Ram Sarangapani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thu 1/19/2006 6:46 AM To: Roy, Santanu
Cc: Rajen Barua; ASSAMNET; Chan Mahanta Subject: Re: [Assam] Demand note is ULFA's: IGP (SB) Sentinel I don't see the point of hitting out
this.
-Original Message-
From: Ram Sarangapani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu 1/19/2006 9:01 AM
To: Roy, Santanu
Cc: Rajen Barua; ASSAMNET; Chan Mahanta
Subject: Re: [Assam] Demand note is ULFA's: IGP (SB) Sentinel
OK,
Let me try and explain (btw - the portion you took out
Title: Re: [Assam] Demand note is ULFA's: IGP (SB)
Sentinel
O' Ram:
I just want to put a few things in perspective here:
1: ULFA
did not ask MRG , nor does MRG pretend, to speak or negotiate
on
behalf of ULFA.
2: MRG
used her influence and goodwill ( which is fairly substantial
at
Dilli
tanu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What is this politics of "ONGC-GOI-ULFA" that she is indulging in? Can you
explain? -Original Message- From: Ram Sarangapani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thu 1/19/2006 6:46 AM To: Roy, Santanu
Cc: Rajen Barua; ASSAMNET; Chan Mahanta Subject: Re:
not be.
-
From: Ram Sarangapani [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Roy, Santanu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: ASSAMNET assam@assamnet.org
Subject: Re: [Assam] Demand note is ULFA's: IGP (SB)
Sentinel
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 18:01:09 -0600
OK,
Let me try and explain (btw - the portion you took out
was actually
Title: Re: [Assam] Demand note is ULFA's: IGP (SB) Sentinel
1: ULFA did not ask MRG , nor does MRG pretend, to speak or negotiate
on behalf of
ULFA.
Is not MRG in the PCG Group which
was formed by ULFA of 'like minded' people?
Does it not imply that MRG is not
only close to ULFA
- From: Ram Sarangapani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thu 1/19/2006 7:40 AM To: Roy, Santanu Cc: Rajen Barua; ASSAMNET; Chan Mahanta
Subject: Re: [Assam] Demand note is ULFA's: IGP (SB) Sentinel What is this politics of ONGC-GOI-ULFA that she is indulging in? Can you explain? Well the ONGC
Title: Re: [Assam] Demand note is ULFA's: IGP (SB) Sentinel
"Be that as it may, the demand note to the ONGC will not hamper the peace process since extortion by
militants is not unusual."
Thinking again, I think the above
statement by MRG may bea 'wish' statement. Note
] Demand note is ULFA's: IGP (SB)Sentinel
Re: [Assam] Demand note is ULFA's: IGP (SB) SentinelSince the ULFA has neither admitted nor denied the issuance of the demand note to the ONGC, it is too early to draw a conclusion on the authenticity of the letter.
It may be because MMG is a writer, who
3:11 PM
Subject: Re: [Assam] Demand note is ULFA's: IGP (SB) Sentinel
Since the ULFA has neither admitted nor denied the issuance of the demand note to the ONGC, it is too early to draw a conclusion on the authenticity of the letter.
It may be because MMGis awriter, who by nature of her tribe
46 matches
Mail list logo
