Hi,
messages i place in the resendmail doesn't seem to get resent, even after a few
hours.
I had to restart assp before it triggers the resending.
Is there anywhere i can trigger resending or whats the resend interval or
perhaps something is broken in my setup?
Thanks!
have little experience of Perl and always just used
the "built-in" distro approved version. I was hoping to have a 3rd
party repo that I could use and then install with YUM.(I have some
experience of building from source so its possible, but not sure if a
good i
ook around the wiki and other
documents, but so far I didn't find the information.
Thankyou for ASSP I'm amazed what perl can do in experts hands.
--Paul
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's mos
RIP Fritz.
I will remember him as always ready to help others.
He will be missed.
paul
On 12 May 2014 at 17:35, Thomas Eckardt wrote:
Hi all,
Fritz Borgstedt (15. April 1945 - 8. Mai 2014) is no longer with us.
He lost the battle with cancer.
Fritz may no longer be with us, but his
I had this exact problem when I first switched to ASSP version 2.
It turned out to be that my MTA - qmail wasn't patched correctly to use
certificates via ssl/tls. Once I was happy the patch on the MTA was
installed correctly all worked fine.
Hope that helps.
On Mon, 7 May 2012 17:18:06
in version 1. I basically
gave up with Version 1 and upgraded to ASSP Version 2 and touch wood
haven't noticed the problem since.
Hope that helps
Paul
On Fri, 21 Oct 2011 13:26:46 -0500, PMW Troy wrote:
Ok, guess I hadn't noticed the difference in sizes on the other
mails
maillist now as thats the one for version 2 :)
Chars
Paul
On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 11:23:44 -0700, James Moe wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I installed ASSP v2.0.1 and copied the ASSP v1 assp.cfg file to the
v2 directory. The v1 installation used nospam4me as the web
PM, Paul Houlbrookeduk...@shooflyblues.com
wrote:
I'm having trouble importing my Penalty Box files in MySQL. I keep
getting errors about there being to many connections. Everything else is
working fine with MySQL, just the pb is having trouble.
Sep-28-11 21:01:12 [init] Starting SMTP
Thank you
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 18:22:47 -0400, Nicholas Hickman wrote:
Paul,
The number in URIBLmaxreplies setting has to be equal to or less than
the number of hosts configured in URIBLServiceProvider.
Example. If URIBLServiceProvider is set to
'multi.surbl.org|black.uribl.com' hosts
thank you.
On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 07:16:48 +0200, Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
For Users of ASSP assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net writes:
since restarting assp.pl it shows this 45WPcXBk5dhLo for the
webAdminPassword. I looks to me like an encrypted version of the
password. In version 1 it used to be
didnt realise that, will do thanks
Paul
On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 09:29:53 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
Paul -
Fyi, if you are going to be using ASSP2, you should switch to the
assp-test list, the assp-user list is intended more for v1 support...
On 2011-09-29 9:22 AM, Paul Farrow
http://assp.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/assp/assp2/
assp.mod.zip should be all the modules needed.
On 9/27/2011 8:00 PM, Paul Farrow wrote:
So I decided to do it. And having a lot of problem installing the perl
modules that I need.
I have found that the cpantesters.org is down, not sure how
Thanks Paul
I ran the assp.mod but it complained about several modules not being
installed. Mail::SPF::Query, DBD::ODBC, DBD::ADO and can't remember the
other but I think it was something::Himer. Because the cpantesters.org
was down I just forced the Mail::SPF::Query as I could not see
help.
Paul
--
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive record of customers, application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data
I am seeing this warning though in the log file, what does that
actually mean / what do I need to do to get rid of it.
AdminUpdate: warning count of URIBLServiceProvider not =
URIBLmaxreplies - possibly ok if weigths are used
Thanks
Paul
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 14:28:22 -0400, Paul Farrow
I'm having trouble importing my Penalty Box files in MySQL. I keep
getting errors about there being to many connections. Everything else is
working fine with MySQL, just the pb is having trouble.
Sep-28-11 21:01:12 [init] Starting SMTP-worker-threads with
ThreadCycleTime set to 3000
info: removed '250-STARTTLS' from
reply
Sep-28-11 22:40:00 [Worker_1] Disconnected: 10.1.10.149 - command
list was 'EHLO,QUIT' - used 2 SocketCalls
and thunderbird says
Thanks
--
Paul
--
All the data continuously
not with you ??
Sorry
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 19:48:14 -0700, Jeremy McSpadden wrote:
Using stunnel ?
--
Jeremy McSpadden
On Sep 28, 2011, at 9:46 PM, Paul Farrow a...@thefabfarrows.com
wrote:
Since upgrading to version 2, instead of an intermittent problem
with Thunderbird I have
I believe the SSL in assp.
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 19:53:44 -0700, Jeremy McSpadden wrote:
What's accepting the ssl connection? Are you using stunnel ? Or the
SSL in ASSP?
--
Jeremy McSpadden
On Sep 28, 2011, at 9:51 PM, Paul Farrow a...@thefabfarrows.com
wrote:
not with you ??
Sorry
for this message is now 25
Sep-28-11 22:57:34 [Worker_1] 10.1.10.149 [SMTP Error] 554 5.7.1
Misbehaved SMTP session (EarlyTalker)
Sep-28-11 22:57:34 [Worker_1] Disconnected: 10.1.10.149 - command list
was 'n/a' - used 1 SocketCalls
any ideas?
Thanks
Paul
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 19:53:44 -0700, Jeremy
to
be nospam4me but cant get that to work. Any ideas on that anyone?
Thanks
Paul
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 20:02:45 -0700, Jeremy McSpadden wrote:
ASSP SSL support on port 465 using stunnel (#03)
( updated 11 Mar 2011 , compatible with all ASSP versions)
Be sure your all your ASSP alternative ports
it.
--
Jeremy McSpadden
On Sep 28, 2011, at 11:10 PM, Paul Farrow a...@thefabfarrows.com
wrote:
Thanks but I believe that shouldn't be necessary. It works for my
webmail client and android phone but not Thunderbird on mac or pc
via
port 465.
I then tried to get to the admin webserver
and come back tomorrow.
Thanks for your help.
Paul
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 21:13:03 -0700, Jeremy McSpadden wrote:
Edit the config file and set it.
--
Jeremy McSpadden
On Sep 28, 2011, at 11:10 PM, Paul Farrow a...@thefabfarrows.com
wrote:
Thanks but I believe that shouldn't be necessary
Is possible to import pre-existing database files, such as spamdb and
whitelist, into a mysql database? Or do the files need to be started over?
--
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains
So far, so good. Moving over to version 2 was very simple.
On 9/26/2011 2:31 PM, Paul Farrow wrote:
Just for the record I have the thunderbird issue as well. I am also
getting timeout / closing the connection issues with various mails
coming many times or not at all.
Will be moving
Thank you, will try this once I have version 2 installed.
On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 22:05:19 +0200, Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
For Users of ASSP assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net writes:
As you say it looks like it comes from linkedin but it didn't really.
remove linkedin.com fom whiteListedDomains and
in advance.
Paul
On Tue, 27 Sep 2011 10:41:38 -0400, Paul Houlbrooke wrote:
So far, so good. Moving over to version 2 was very simple.
On 9/26/2011 2:31 PM, Paul Farrow wrote:
Just for the record I have the thunderbird issue as well. I am also
getting timeout / closing the connection issues
Can a version 1 configuration be imported into a version 2? Or is it
best to start fresh?
--
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive record of customers, application
Subject: [Assp-user] Importing Version 1 Config to Version 2
From: Paul Houlbrookeduk...@shooflyblues.com
To: For Users of ASSPassp-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 11:56:49 -0400
Can a version 1 configuration be imported into a version 2? Or is it
best to start fresh
Just for the record I have the thunderbird issue as well. I am also
getting timeout / closing the connection issues with various mails
coming many times or not at all.
Will be moving to version 2 once I can muster the energy to do it.
Please let me know of your experience Paul.
Thanks
Paul
the spam coming in are very similar. I noticed that the
Reply-To is a LinkedIn domain which I have whitelisted. But the from is
not a whitelisted domain. And the To doesn't even exist on my MTA.
Thanks in advance.
Paul
my setting is still the default setting so that is odd !!
On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 19:47:22 +0200, Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
Set - NotGreedyWhitelist to ON (default)
--
BlackBerryreg; DevCon Americas, Oct. 18-20, San
as intended for does hence why I keep getting
them.
As you say it looks like it comes from linkedin but it didn't really.
Thanks
Paul
On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 10:52:57 -0700, Jeremy McSpadden wrote:
Facebook sending out Linkedin mail ? You said its making it through,
yet the mailbox does not exist, so
When sending mail from within the network where ASSP is installed, the
DenyStrict rule is tripped for my local network address. When I send the
mail from outside of the network, no problem.
ASSP 1.9.1.4(1.0.00)
denySMTPConnectionsFromAlways = file:files/denyalways.txt
denyalways.txt is
Thanks, didn't realise it was in denystrict.txt. I added 192.168.0.0/16
to acceptAllMail in case it gets readded to denystrict.txt some how.
On 9/13/2011 11:48 AM, Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
For Users of ASSPassp-user@lists.sourceforge.net writes:
DenyStrict
Put 192.168.0.0/16 into
Thanks Nelson.
Do I need a redirect as where does the output go - stdout?
Paul
On Wed, 7 Sep 2011 22:47:37 +0800, Nelson Serafica wrote:
It should be between smtp and /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd.
/etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -c $MAXSMTPD \
-u $QMAILDUID -g $NOFILESGID 0 smtp*
/usr/local/bin
ah right, ok was a bit lost that it would actually go in there. My
setup is exactly like LWQ so there are logs in /var/log/qmail so
hopefully will be in there.
Thanks again
Paul
On Wed, 7 Sep 2011 23:11:53 +0800, Nelson Serafica wrote:
Just check it out in your qmail log. Mine was in
/var
.
Paul
On Wed, 7 Sep 2011 23:11:53 +0800, Nelson Serafica wrote:
Just check it out in your qmail log. Mine was in
/var/log/qmail/smtp/current. If you follow the procedure in LWQ, then
it
would somewhere in /var/log/qmail.
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 10:52 PM, Paul Farrow a...@thefabfarrows.com
and noticed that the email is stored in the notspam
directory so its passed all the validation so it has to be the
conversation with the MTA (qmail in this instance) which is likely where
the problem is.
Thanks again for your help
Paul
On Wed, 07 Sep 2011 21:11:02 +0200, Fritz Borgstedt wrote
Not sure this will work all the time as I don't have a full list of
bank of america's ip addresses and I am sure they use different mail
servers.
I think I will just try to update to Version 2. Been fighting it all
this time !! :)
Thanks again
Paul
On Wed, 07 Sep 2011 21:13:37 +0200, Fritz
Whats interesting is that the default qmail timeout is 10 minutes and I
am seeing the bank of america conversation is exactly 10 minutes before
its disconnected so it looks like it just sitting there.
I did see on the web about bare linefeeds are not allowed stated in RFC
2821 and wondered if
Thank you Fritz
I appreciate it.
Paul
On Wed, 07 Sep 2011 22:26:47 +0200, Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
For Users of ASSP assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net writes:
Not sure this will work all the time as I don't have a full list of
bank of america's ip addresses and I am sure they use different mail
to reflect that) or it disconnected in between dialog or
something else happened.
Can any one suggest anything please?
Paul
--
Special Offer -- Download ArcSight Logger for FREE!
Finally, a world-class log management
Some extra light, it would seem that it takes 10 minutes from when bank
of america first connect to when I get the file stored in notspam.
Which seems very odd.
On Tue, 06 Sep 2011 09:54:17 -0400, Paul Farrow wrote:
Hi
Can any one shed some light on this one please? I am running ASSP
in the notspam folder.
Any other ideas?
Paul
On Tue, 06 Sep 2011 10:37:25 -0400, Doug Lytle wrote:
Paul Farrow wrote:
Some extra light, it would seem that it takes 10 minutes from when
bank
of america first connect to when I get the file stored in notspam.
Which seems very odd.
I'd suggest
, but Bank of America seems to have this problem from time to time
and just haven't worked out why.
Thanks for your help
Paul
On Tue, 06 Sep 2011 11:19:57 -0400, Doug Lytle wrote:
Paul Farrow wrote:
I will switch on the debugging but not sure its going to tell me
much
as the email is on my system
I am not seeing SSL timeouts at all. It just seems as though ASSP is
not passing it on.
I will try to upgrade to version 2 to see if that cures the problem.
Any notes on how to upgrade an existing version 1 site?
Thanks
Paul
On Tue, 06 Sep 2011 13:21:24 -0400, Doug Lytle wrote:
Paul
it.
Shouldnt it do it the other away around. Delay first then work out if
its a valid address.
2. what is actually happening when it says VRFY added ...@ to
VRFY-/LDAPlist, does it think its a valid address or invalid address??!!
Thanks again
Paul
On Sat, 20 Aug 2011 02:34:30 +0200, Fritz
what I should do in that scenario. Still begs me to ask
what is the added message mean? why does it do that before the
delaying?
Thanks
Paul
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 17:48:52 +0200, Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
The use of of the VRFY feature is meant for installations, where the
MTA behind ASSP does
Ah ... ok thanks for the history.
I use QMAIL behind ASSP, now it looked to me that the LDAP stuff wasn't
working properly but maybe that ASSP isn't getting the correct return
codes from QMAIL. Do you know if that is likely?
Thanks
Paul
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 20:00:17 +0200, Fritz Borgstedt
Ah super. Thanks for looking into that.
Cheers
Paul
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 22:34:42 +0200, Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
For Users of ASSP assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net writes:
I use QMAIL behind ASSP, now it looked to me that the LDAP stuff
wasn't
working properly but maybe that ASSP isn't getting
Ah actually I see DoVRFY defaults to On, so it seems obvious but I do
need to set that to off for my installation right?
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 22:36:53 +0200, Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
For Users of ASSP assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net writes:
I use QMAIL behind ASSP
I repeat, I do not recommend
version 1 of ASSP.
Thanks
Paul
--
Get a FREE DOWNLOAD! and learn more about uberSVN rich system,
user administration capabilities and model configuration. Take
the hassle out of deploying and managing Subversion
.
Paul
--
Magic Quadrant for Content-Aware Data Loss Prevention
Research study explores the data loss prevention market. Includes in-depth
analysis on the changes within the DLP market, and the criteria used to
evaluate
Thanks again
Paul
On Thu, 14 Jul 2011 22:49:30 +0200, Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
For Users of ASSP assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net schreibt:
Ok I will reword that sentence. Is there a variable to switch on
that
logs the ip addresses that are dropped by DoPenaltyExtremeSMTP? For
example
Never heard of that project before. Looks interesting, I will try that
not only for ASSP but for attacks on my webservers etc.
Thank you.
Paul
On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 09:46:55 -0400, Joe Aldeguer wrote:
I too get this kind of brute force attacks against my sasl
authentication. Rather than put
I have that set but I never seem to have any ip numbers exported into
my exportedextreme file. It does the exporting because I see it in the
log but it never puts anything in it. Is that because I have ASSP
setting set to test somewhere?
On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 20:43:56 +0200, Fritz Borgstedt
Ok. DoPenaltyExtremeSMTP looks rather frightening will it log the ip
addresses blocked.
Plus how does it cope with someone probing email addresses constantly
as in the example I have seen on my box?
Thanks
Paul
On Thu, 14 Jul 2011 15:03:05 +0200, Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
For Users of ASSP
Ok I will reword that sentence. Is there a variable to switch on that
logs the ip addresses that are dropped by DoPenaltyExtremeSMTP? For
example for greylisting logging you have to set DelayLog which is one
place I lost logging by not having that set.
On Thu, 14 Jul 2011 19:29:56 +0200,
Ok so I see an ip address probing my smtp authentication so I stick the
ip address in my denyalways.txt file. I see the file being reloaded in
the log.
But the ip address continues to probe. Do I have to restart assp or
should it pick that up?
Thanks
Paul
I meant denySMTPConnectionsFromAlways my bad. I wondered if it was
just because the spammer testing the authentication was already
connected. I restarted ASSP and he seemed to go away, which either
caused him to stop or he is denied now.
On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 13:55:00 +, Joseph L. Casale
Ok. Shame really because in my case that is likely to be SPAM.
Thank you
Paul
On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 03:30:01 +0200, Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
For Users of ASSP assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net schreibt:
Ok so mail that is rejected by the vrfydomains settings will that
contribute to the spam
Ok fair enough, I understand what your saying. Will take a look at
those tunable parameters for that sort of stuff.
Thanks again
Paul
On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 18:14:19 +0200, Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
For Users of ASSP assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net schreibt:
Ok. Shame really because in my case
Thank you for your help.
The problem with that is I get a lot of spam for emails that don't
exist in my system. I am not interested in those just a list of
specific users and that means I have to put in multiple requests.
Thanks again
Paul
On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 17:38:40 -0400, K Post wrote
Hi
Is there a way to say this email is always SPAM but don't let it come
through to me? I have used the SpamLovers configuration but the spam
still comes to me.
Thanks
Paul
--
All of the data generated in your
super thanks.
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 17:11:36 +0200, Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
For Users of ASSP assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net schreibt:
Is there a way to say this email is always SPAM but don't let it come
through to me? I have used the SpamLovers configuration but the spam
still comes to me.
. I dont want to report blocked spam to emails that I dont
have.
Does that make sense?
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 12:47:02 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2011-06-27 9:31 AM, Paul Farrow wrote:
The problem with that is I get a lot of spam for emails that don't
exist in my system.
Why are you
How ? Please can you tell me how to do that as I dont want non
existent user blocked spam to be reported in my blocked email report?
Thanks
Paul
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 21:45:14 +0200, Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
For Users of ASSP assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net schreibt:
Most spam is to non
That's great thanks. So do the mails to non existent users on my
domain now contribute to the spam collection?
Paul
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 22:19:55 +0200, Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
For Users of ASSP assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net schreibt:
How ? Please can you tell me how to do that as I dont
Ok so mail that is rejected by the vrfydomains settings will that
contribute to the spam collections automatically as that is likely to
be
SPAM?
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 22:56:12 +0200, Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
For Users of ASSP assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net schreibt:
That's great thanks. So do
it processes the requests the domains go
into different emails to my admin email account. Is there any way to
get all the reports in one email ?
Thank you
Paul
--
All the data continuously generated in your
:30 -0400, Paul Farrow wrote:
It would appear that any email addresses in my noProcessing list are
getting this unimplemented error from my work exchange box. I can
send to an email address that is not in the noProcessing list and it
makes it in !!
Version is ...
Running as user 'nobody
the analyzer and it works
fine although the noprocessing line just shows '' rather than
s...@somedomain.com which is what I would have expected.
Can any one now shed some light on this problem I am having?
Thanks
Paul
On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 10:25:52 -0400, Paul Farrow wrote:
Hi Guys
I
, this is zero bytes on my system. Is that correct?
Thanks
Paul
On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 09:06:09 -0400, Paul Farrow wrote:
Sent an email from my local machine and it makes it through. I then
decided to mail it through work which is an exchange box and I got
this reply
mail.thefabfarrows.com
Thanks Fritz.
I think thats the trick the NoRelayingStrict has changed in the last
month.
Paul
On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 06:05:59 +0200, Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
For Users of ASSP assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net schreibt:
Looking back in my logs it never used to log both lines
be delayed
once.
Thanks
Paul
--
EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content
authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image
Editing and ensure content is compliant
explanation on why that is, is it because it still
needs to make the griplist so it can be uploaded to the global griplist?
Thanks
Paul
--
Simplify data backup and recovery for your virtual environment with vRanger
I think I am trying to say that I didn't see a delay logging line after
a relay attempt before in earlier versions of ASSP. It seems now that
all relay attempts then have a delayed logging line after them as though
the emails are being added to the griplist.
Does that make sense?
On
but
disabled;
Thanks
Paul
On Mon, 30 May 2011 10:07:38 +0200, Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
For Users of ASSP assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net schreibt:
Hi guys
Since the last two updates my restarting doesn't work. I have my
assp
run as nobody and it cant create the admin console to listen on port
that is slightly different to what happens on an
automatic update.
If I should run with sudo then can you talk me through how I set that
up please?
Thanks
Paul
On Mon, 30 May 2011 18:33:17 +0200, Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
For Users of ASSP assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net schreibt:
When
it is
called. Can I test it somehow? The update in the gui just does the
update it doesnt call the os-shell command.
Cheers
Paul
On Mon, 30 May 2011 21:34:39 +0200, Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
For Users of ASSP assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net schreibt:
I have never run it with a sudo command
replied personally as it has a big chunk of my log in it.
On Mon, 30 May 2011 22:09:49 +0200, Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
For Users of ASSP assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net schreibt:
Is start the appropriate command here as I said earlier the restart
never worked for me as ASSP seemed to be
its not root well its not because its nobody.
Any ideas think its happened to me on the last two automatic updates?
Thanks
Paul
--
vRanger cuts backup time in half-while increasing security.
With the market-leading
Trying to found out the problem with why domains in whitedomains.txt
get delayed, I noticed that an ip address keeps probing my smtp auth
connections. So I put that ip address in denyalways.txt and restarted
ASSP. It appears that the probe keeps coming in and I see invalid SMTP
Perl /usr/bin/perl version 5.012003 (5.12.3);
May-19-11 13:41:22 ASSP 1.8.5.9(2.0.02) starting (PID: 14225) as
daemon;
Thanks again
Paul
On Thu, 19 May 2011 13:33:56 -0400, Paul Farrow wrote:
Trying to found out the problem with why domains in whitedomains.txt
get delayed, I noticed
have the
other?
Thanks
Paul
On Thu, 19 May 2011 22:37:36 +0200, Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
For Users of ASSP assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net schreibt:
Not sure whether it should be set by ASSP and that is a
bug or what? I noticed that DenySMTPConnectionsFrom was blank also
and
not seeing any
When your reading the assp.cfg.description.txt you only read the config
entry your interested in.
Ok put it down to me, apologies.
Paul
On Fri, 20 May 2011 06:10:38 +0200, Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
For Users of ASSP assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net schreibt:
Ok, the description
Thank you
On Fri, 20 May 2011 06:24:17 +0200, Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
For Users of ASSP assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net schreibt:
DenySMTPConnectionsFrom and DenySMTPConnectionsFromAlways? The
latter
is obvious but what is the DenySMTPConnectionsFrom for, if you have
the
other?
sent to you via your direct email.
On Wed, 18 May 2011 10:45:08 +0200, Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
For Users of ASSP assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net schreibt:
⢠Whitelisted Domains: 'ger911.com'
⢠24.214.64.231 is in PB White
⢠24.214.64 has a Griplist value of 0.02: (adds 0.02 0.02)
ignore this thread I was forwarding the mail to the analyzer email
interface rather than cutting and pasting the source.
User Error :)
On Wed, 18 May 2011 10:10:08 +0200, Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
For Users of ASSP assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net schreibt:
Fritz its very odd. I don't have
expected.
Thank you
Paul
On Mon, 16 May 2011 22:04:48 +0200, Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
For Users of ASSP assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net schreibt:
I had play.com in my whitedomains.txt and noticed that an email from
that domain was being delayed. I have the DelayWL=0 so I wouldn't
have
Hi Fritz
I can see lots of spam found but when I request the blocked log it
just says no blocked email.
Now the spam found is not for the email requesting the report as I
have recently moved email domains. Do I need to set the
BlockReportFilter? I seem to try all combinations and it
The NotGreedyWhiteList is blank so I guess it is switched off.
It is rather odd, I noticed it with other mails that I have in the
whiteListedDomains file. But then I have others that are saying its
whitelisted and let them through odd. What I will do with that play.com
newsletter is put
there is an entry of it reloading in the log.
On Tue, 17 May 2011 15:52:51 +0200, Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
For Users of ASSP assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net schreibt:
It is rather odd, I noticed it with other mails that I have in the
whiteListedDomains file.
What happens if you add a domain
Can I analyze the delayed email somehow? I don't physically have the
email at this point. Once I have the email I can analyze it. Probably
be a while before I get another play.com newsletter, but will get back
to you then.
Thanks again
Paul
On Tue, 17 May 2011 17:10:40 +0200, Fritz
I will try tonight Fritz with just the email, as I can only use command
line from where I am now.
Thanks again
Paul
On Tue, 17 May 2011 18:16:35 +0200, Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
For Users of ASSP assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net schreibt:
Can I analyze the delayed email somehow? I don't
will get some insight.
Cheers
Paul
--
Achieve unprecedented app performance and reliability
What every C/C++ and Fortran developer should know.
Learn how Intel has extended the reach of its next-generation tools
to help
Ok I will check it out tonight. I can access the GUI when I am where
the server is but I don't allow port 5 to be public on the firewall
as I don't want to have everyone out there probing my assp gui
installation.
Thanks again
Paul
On Tue, 17 May 2011 19:53:31 +0200, Fritz
I did use the email interface on another email that I saw the same
thing happening which got delayed. The email interface didn't really
tell me much just how the Bayesian spam filter was weighting the words
in the email not if it was on a whitelist or not or why it might have
been
Fritz its very odd. I don't have any information in the analyze email
interface to do with white listing. It just has Bayesian Filtering and
Spam/Ham possibilities. Is there a setting to let that be provided.
That is provided by sending an email to assp-analyze@mydomain and the
1 - 100 of 845 matches
Mail list logo
