Fritz Borgstedt schreef:
For Users of ASSP assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net schreibt:
Really? When we first started out, the end users helped in the
training
of the database.
Doug
You may have your own strategy. The strategy of ASSP is to have some
days to get familiar with
I'm a little confused on how to catch false positives in ASSP (Ham
that ASSP thinks is Spam). When setting up ASSP, the Wiki says to run
in Test mode and to Be sure the Prepend Spam Subject is also
blank. Then, after in Test mode for a while, it says Either turn
off Test Mode or put
ja...@jwhorn.com wrote:
in Test mode and to Be sure the Prepend Spam Subject is also
blank.
This would be incorrect. Is should have a tag, in our case, it's [SPAM]
Then, after in Test mode for a while, it says Either turn
off Test Mode or put something like [SPAM] in the Prepend to
For Users of ASSP assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net schreibt:
But if you turn off test mode, you will never see
Ham that ASSP thinks is Spam, because ASSP will filter it out.
There is a section called Copy Spam Ham!
You should have all Spams send to sendAllSpam.
For Users of ASSP assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net schreibt:
This would be incorrect. Is should have a tag, in our case, it's
[SPAM]
That is absolutely correct. If you starting your ASSP installation for
the first time, no user should see anything strange. So the first
several days (weeks) you
Doug,
Thanks for the reply. I'm surprised that the ASSP wiki is incorrect.
I don't know who maintains it, but if those sections are really
incorrect, I hope somebody will update them.
- Jason
On Mar 27, 2009, at 9:35 AM, Doug Lytle wrote:
ja...@jwhorn.com wrote:
in Test mode and to Be
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
That is absolutely correct. If you starting your ASSP installation for
the first time, no user should see anything strange. So the first
several days (weeks) you run in testmode WITHOUT a tag.
Really? When we first started out, the end users helped in the training
Fritz,
That's interesting. Does the addition of the prepend to the subject
(spamSubject) affect the accuracy of the filtering, or is it just for
the sake of informing users? I had assumed that the reason not to
initially set a value in spamSubject was because the filters would
then be
This makes sense to me. This is why I find is so strange that the
Wiki makes a strong point of saying Be sure the Prepend Spam
Subject is also blank, without explaining why.
- Jason
On Mar 27, 2009, at 10:22 AM, Doug Lytle wrote:
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
That is absolutely correct. If you
For Users of ASSP assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net schreibt:
Really? When we first started out, the end users helped in the
training
of the database.
Doug
You may have your own strategy. The strategy of ASSP is to have some
days to get familiar with the system. It is unnessary (and we think
For Users of ASSP assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net schreibt:
That's interesting. Does the addition of the prepend to the subject
(spamSubject) affect the accuracy of the filtering, or is it just for
the sake of informing users?
It is for informing users.
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
You may have your own strategy. The strategy of ASSP is to have some
days to get familiar with the system. It is unnessary (and we think
wrong) to have user involved in this stage. In Getting Started ( and
This is acceptable. We've been using ASSP since 2003 when
Doug Lytle wrote:
Really? When we first started out, the end users helped in
the training of the database.
You trust your end users to do that during initial training? LoL!
--
Brett
--
Hill, Brett wrote:
You trust your end users to do that during initial training? LoL!
For the most part, it worked well. For those that had questions, we had
them call the help desk.
Doug
--
Ben Franklin quote:
Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary
14 matches
Mail list logo
