At 05:41 PM 8/11/2011, you wrote:
http://www.scene.co.nz/new-caa-rules-for-air-thrills-firms/293895a1.pagehttp://www.scene.co.nz/new-caa-rules-for-air-thrills-firms/293895a1.page
___
The seminar was held to explain how to complete
the reams of
At 06:28 PM 8/11/2011, you wrote:
At 05:41 PM 8/11/2011, you wrote:
http://www.scene.co.nz/new-caa-rules-for-air-thrills-firms/293895a1.pagehttp://www.scene.co.nz/new-caa-rules-for-air-thrills-firms/293895a1.page
___
The seminar was held to
Maybe it is all about Australia NZ rivalry, Australia is first with such
widely based the carbon tax, so NZ ups the ante with being first with this
regulation, and proud of it obviously, given this “We are to my knowledge
is the only regulator in the world to introduce an adventure aviation rule.
Mike I certainly hope they do not restrict the GFA AEF system. It is expensive
enough now.
You would be more familiar than I am as to the number of incidents GFA has had
under the above system
Rob Moore
On 09/11/2011, at 10:06 AM, Mike Cleaver wom...@netspeed.com.au wrote:
When it was
Brought to my attention today that from January, the OLC will not accept
traces from Cambridge Model 10/20/25 loggers. This will cause us problems as
all club gliders are equipped with these loggers. Don't know if the GFA is
aware or has had any input, but would suspect it we are not the only ones
Pretty sure they will accept a Flarm trace John
ROSS
From: aus-soaring-boun...@lists.internode.on.net
[mailto:aus-soaring-boun...@lists.internode.on.net] On Behalf Of John
Trezise
Sent: Wednesday, 9 November 2011 4:03 PM
To: aus-soaring@lists.internode.on.net
Subject: [Aus-soaring] Cambridge
Hi John,
I don't speak for either the OLC or the GFA, but as an innocent
bystander I can make a couple of comments.
The OLC is a private organisation which makes its own decisions. It is
not directly connected with the FAI or IGC and the GFA has no more
influence with it than any other
