RE: [OT] Multiple questions in an email

2010-02-26 Thread Richard Carde
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 9:41 PM, David Richards ausdot...@davidsuniverse.com wrote: Greetings all, Has anyone else noticed people often don't answer more than one question in an email? In fact, I'll generalise that and say people often don't read an entire email. I had this today

Re: [OT] Multiple questions in an email

2010-02-25 Thread silky
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 8:41 AM, David Richards ausdot...@davidsuniverse.com wrote: Greetings all, Has anyone else noticed people often don't answer more than one question in an email?  In fact, I'll generalise that and say people often don't read an entire email.  I had this today (already)

Re: [OT] Multiple questions in an email

2010-02-25 Thread David Connors
It is funny you should say this. One of the guys i work with at a partner company and I always say include only one fact per email. :) I try to do that but when requirements get complicated it can get hard. -- David Connors Software Engineer Codify Pty Ltd - www.codify.com Phone: +61 (7)

Re: [OT] Multiple questions in an email

2010-02-25 Thread Iain Carlin
My rule of thumb is if the email starts to get too complicated pick up the good old phone :-) On 26 February 2010 08:25, David Connors da...@codify.com wrote: It is funny you should say this. One of the guys i work with at a partner company and I always say include only one fact per email. :)

Re: [OT] Multiple questions in an email

2010-02-25 Thread Arjang Assadi
People don't read more than the first 2 lines of emails. For example I stopped reading after I'll generalise :) Regards Arjang On 26 February 2010 08:41, David Richards ausdot...@davidsuniverse.com wrote: Greetings all, Has anyone else noticed people often don't answer more than one

Re: [OT] Multiple questions in an email

2010-02-25 Thread Jonathan Parker
The problem with using emails as requirements documents... Q: Where are the requirements for the cruise control software? A: I'll forward you the email trail of the discussions I had with Toyota. a year or so goes by Q: Don't you know the cruise control should disengage when you brake? A: Sorry

Re: [OT] Multiple questions in an email

2010-02-25 Thread David Richards
You mean that's not the norm? :) Requirements docs are like bigfoot. You are assured it exists but when you see it, you are disappointed to find it is little more than just do it. Plus its wearing a digital watch. David If we can hit that bullseye, the rest of the dominoes will fall like a

Re: [OT] Multiple questions in an email

2010-02-25 Thread Jonathan Parker
What is needed is a replacement of email. A format that allows editing and versioning built into the email client. Then you can say. Ahh. Jim changed this line of the email on this date and then Jane changed it again a week later. It will save millions of dollars in bandwidth costs too. On Fri,

Re: [OT] Multiple questions in an email

2010-02-25 Thread noonie
Ah... _That_ already exists. It's called Google wave. https://wave.google.com/wave/ -- noonie On 26 February 2010 12:00, Jonathan Parker jonathanparkerem...@gmail.comwrote: What is needed is a replacement of email. A format that allows editing and versioning built into the email client.

Re: [OT] Multiple questions in an email

2010-02-25 Thread silky
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Jonathan Parker jonathanparkerem...@gmail.com wrote: What is needed is a replacement of email. A format that allows editing and versioning built into the email client. Then you can say. Ahh. Jim changed this line of the email on this date and then Jane changed

Re: [OT] Multiple questions in an email

2010-02-25 Thread David Richards
I agree. I also think people are beginning to imagine email to be the same as things like IM, SMS, etc. Obviously it's not. I can take my original question/statement and expand it to include instructions in email. More often than not (not an exaggeration this time) people don't read my