Re: Connors makes Slashdot : The Rick Roll

2010-02-18 Thread silky
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 8:57 PM, Les Hughes l...@datarev.com.au wrote: silky wrote: Poor guys were probably just trying to download some _interesting_ presentations ... Lets analyse the data and see who's presentation coincides with the most bit-torrenting ... I was also trolling

Re: Connors makes Slashdot : The Rick Roll

2010-02-18 Thread silky
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 9:00 PM, David Connors da...@codify.com wrote: Can we talk about VB.NET vs C#, politics, religion and global warming now? I have a TE meeting all day tomorrow. My timing is impeccable. I can't believe you guys refuse to accept that the Internet Filtering project is all

Re: Connors makes Slashdot : The Rick Roll

2010-02-18 Thread silky
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 9:10 PM, Les Hughes l...@datarev.com.au wrote: David Connors wrote: Can we talk about VB.NET http://VB.NET vs C#, politics, religion and global warming now? VB/C# and global warming *are* both somewhat religion and politics... but anyway, here goes something:

Re: Connors makes Slashdot : The Rick Roll

2010-02-18 Thread David Connors
On 18 February 2010 22:23, silky michaelsli...@gmail.com wrote: Now see what you need is a system that does automatic, on-demand, mirroring over EC2 or GAE or some other such thing. Auto-akamai. Maybe even a buy-in (sell-in) co-op akamai, where distributed hosts offer up some of their

Re: Connors makes Slashdot : The Rick Roll

2010-02-18 Thread David Connors
On 18 February 2010 22:16, silky michaelsli...@gmail.com wrote: http://www.mirios.com.au/adhoc/no.html Boom Tish! I have resisted posting that three times now. -- David Connors (da...@codify.com) Software Engineer Codify Pty Ltd - www.codify.com Phone: +61 (7) 3210 6268 | Facsimile: +61 (7)

Re: Connors makes Slashdot : The Rick Roll

2010-02-18 Thread mike smith
On 19 February 2010 08:35, Greg Keogh g...@mira.net wrote: VB.NET is an inefficient language consuming greater CPU power resulting [cut] dislikes C# due to references in Leviticus which equate it with the devils work Rebuttal? No one can argue with the first part of what you said, but the