On 19 Dec 2007, at 10:43, Brian Butterworth wrote:
6. Icons. Since Windows 3, the down triangle has been used to
mean drop down menu. I know web designers HATE following UI
hints that users have known for decades, but it does make it easier
to use. If you could refer to:
More feedback for you.
Vista Pro, IE7, 16 million colours, second monitor (1024x768). I set the
font size to -2 and this is what I get:
http://bnb.bpweb.net/misc/bbc_hp.png
Specific problems:
1. Customise homepage has gone onto two lines, not correctly aligned
2. All the colours have banded
Never mind EOT, just emply a tasteful dollup of SiFR -
http://www.mikeindustries.com/sifr for the uninitiated. Never mind all that
proprietary EOT stuff, (and whilst I don't actually loathe IE, I just think
it's a waste of a feature.) Bonus: cross-browser branded headers in whatever
font the BBC's
On 19/12/2007, Christopher Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Never mind EOT, just emply a tasteful dollup of SiFR -
http://www.mikeindustries.com/sifr for the uninitiated. Never mind all
that proprietary EOT stuff, (and whilst I don't actually loathe IE, I just
think it's a waste of a feature.)
It's always the way isn't it when designing websites that want a unique
feel, extra typefaces look great but there's the tradeoff with accessibility
and compatibility.
It's good that there are options around to try to alleviate some of these
problems, but as with any deviation from the 'standard',
On 19/12/2007, Matt Barber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's always the way isn't it when designing websites that want a unique
feel, extra typefaces look great but there's the tradeoff with accessibility
and compatibility.
It's good that there are options around to try to alleviate some of these
I also like the initial effect, however...
why is 50% of the space uneditable?
seems contrary to sense,
can't find any excuse for the obligatory large picture with 4
choices, please remove, optionally of course ~:
the directory could also be editable, with a minimise and reset if
desirable.
I second the clock, looks great. Nice redesign for a new era of the web.
Great the way that video and rich media has presecence now as it will be
used more and more in coming months I should think.
Few tweaks here and there, as mentioned the accessibility issues with
tabbing through content, and
, December 18, 2007 11:15 AM
To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
Subject: Re: [backstage] New BBC customisable homepage
I also like the initial effect, however...
why is 50% of the space uneditable?
seems contrary to sense,
can't find any excuse for the obligatory large picture with 4
choices
@lists.bbc.co.uk
Subject: Re: [backstage] New BBC customisable homepage
I second the clock, looks great. Nice redesign for a new era of the web. Great
the way that video and rich media has presecence now as it will be used more
and more in coming months I should think.
Few tweaks here
of waiting for Dr Who on a Saturday night
(and schools programmes!)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Barber
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2007 11:27 AM
To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
Subject: Re: [backstage] New BBC customisable homepage
I second
To show my gratitude for this new beta page, I found some bugs:
In my rush to lose 'Sport' from the page, I clicked on the triangle
expose button at the left of the title bar, but found that it left
the heading there (don't know why I thought it would eliminate it,
must be my lack of experience
Subject: Re: [backstage] New BBC customisable homepage
To show my gratitude for this new beta page, I found some bugs:
In my rush to lose 'Sport' from the page, I clicked on the triangle
expose button at the left of the title bar, but found that it left the
heading there (don't know why I thought
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frank Wales
Sent: 18 December 2007 14:07
To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
Subject: Re: [backstage] New BBC customisable homepage
To show my gratitude for this new beta page, I found some bugs:
In my rush
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frank Wales
Sent: 18 December 2007 14:07
To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
Subject: Re: [backstage] New BBC customisable homepage
To show my gratitude for this new beta page, I found some bugs:
In my
: +44 (0)2080083965
m: +44 (0)7711913293
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frank Wales
Sent: 18 December 2007 14:07
To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
Subject: Re: [backstage] New BBC customisable homepage
To show my gratitude
Christopher Woods wrote:
I'm glad to see that the clock has finally made a comeback
(...)
I'm a bit disappointed by the clock - or more generally, any web clock
that simply uses the local clock time when it should really be getting a
sync from the server (at the best it duplicates information
On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 08:40:18PM +, Jeremy James wrote:
I'm a bit disappointed by the clock
I'm sorry if I missed the answer to the following question previously
in the thread, but what is the justification for the clock? It could
hardly be argued for utility purpose as most people, I
Another quick bug report.
The character set on the page appears not to support £ signs, this story
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/beds/bucks/herts/7149616.stm appears
with the ? black diamond replacement character in firefox.
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To
On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 09:16:30PM +, Stephen Miller wrote:
The character set on the page appears not to support £ signs, this story
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/beds/bucks/herts/7149616.stm appears
with the ? black diamond replacement character in firefox.
It works for me, though
On 12/19/2007 12:50 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 09:16:30PM +, Stephen Miller wrote:
The character set on the page appears not to support £ signs, this story
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/beds/bucks/herts/7149616.stm appears
with the ? black diamond replacement
21 matches
Mail list logo
