Re: [BackupPC-users] Tar exited with error 512, localhost on Ubuntu 12.10 [SOLVED]

2013-01-30 Thread Magnus Larsson
Hi! Thanks. I've been experimenting a lot, and now seems to have *solved* it. What I did was to include the .gvfs in the exclude dirs, but it did not work with /home/magnus/.gvfs, but finally with ./magnus/.gvfs. Which makes me curious about your exclude-list, that utilizes the full paths,

[BackupPC-users] basic backup / BackupFilesOnly

2013-01-30 Thread Ctdi Unix
I have an old version running successfully. - BackupPC-2.1.2-7.fc6 Now I am trying to get BackupPC-3.2.1-10.fc17.i686 working. I passed the no error you can see no service start thing. It was some of some weird FC17 thing. Now I can't get the most basic backup to run. On the old version my

Re: [BackupPC-users] BackupPC-Visualize - visual plot of host backup durations

2013-01-30 Thread Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom
On 01/28 11:46 , Carl Cravens wrote: I've written a little tool to help analyze BackupPC scheduling that I thought others might find useful. It is meant to generate plots that can be viewed from the web, but it's just as easily used from the command line.

[BackupPC-users] Rsyncd cygwin Problem..

2013-01-30 Thread Travis.Schwenke
So, my goal was going to be rsync on all machines, I seem to have that working fine now on my windows machines, but my work laptop is part of a domain so I figured I would try rsyncd and learn how it worked in the process. It is trying to backup, but it is not following my rules correctly. It is

Re: [BackupPC-users] basic backup / BackupFilesOnly

2013-01-30 Thread Ctdi Unix
Thank you for helping me. You are correct I killed it very quickly. Because in the previous version, the dump command would show the actual shares I wanted on the command line { and not / } and I would not get any messages like *Remote[2]: file has vanished: /proc/2/exe * which indicates it is

Re: [BackupPC-users] basic backup / BackupFilesOnly

2013-01-30 Thread Adam Goryachev
On 31/01/13 14:45, Ctdi Unix wrote: Thank you for helping me. You are correct I killed it very quickly. Because in the previous version, the dump command would show the actual shares I wanted on the command line { and not / } and I would not get any messages like *Remote[2]: file has