I propose the following change that includes the timezone info so that
3rd library does not need to know the time is actually UTC.
diff --git a/lisp/bbdb.el b/lisp/bbdb.el
index d2c72fb9..89e890c3 100644
--- a/lisp/bbdb.el
+++ b/lisp/bbdb.el
@@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ (defcustom bbdb-change-hook
I tried to incoprorate a bunch of smaller issues that came up on
this list the past couple of days. Thanks to everyone who
contributed to this in one or the other way.
On Wed Apr 13 2011 Sam Steingold wrote:
if you do not care about obsolete emacsen, please apply this instead.
I extended (and
Several people on this list have started to contribute to the new
BBDB in one or the other way. I am quite happy to see that!
I'd like to outline my view / strategy for that:
I'd be happy to see a proper release of the new BBDB in the not to
far future. To make BBDB really free software, I'd
On Fri Apr 15 2011 Leo wrote:
I personally haven't used this much in Emacs. But since gmail does this
and I have found it useful at times, I wonder if this feature should be
part of the bbdb-mua feature set.
I am sorry, it's not clear to me what you want to say here. The new
BBDB treats
On Fri Apr 15 2011 Leo wrote:
I wonder if it makes sense to replace bbdb-defstruct with defstruct?
What benefit(s) would you expect from that? I guess that
bbdb-defstruct is about as efficient and effective as possible for
the needs of BBDB.
Roland
On Fri Apr 15 2011 Leo wrote:
When people use add-hook they think they are adding another function to
a hook so if this isn't the case it will surprise them. People who are
setting hook to nil is in a different thinking.
There are add-hook and remove-hook. The latter fails (now) if you
want to
On Mon Apr 11 2011 Nix wrote:
On 11 Apr 2011, Roland Winkler told this:
- Finally, I fixed various bugs and improved the documentation.
I just noticed that BBDB development has restarted. Unfortunately
BBDB 3.0 has removed a good few features, including one I definitely
rely on:
On 17 Apr 2011, Roland Winkler told this:
On Mon Apr 11 2011 Nix wrote:
(I'll also see if bbdb-expire works with v3.0x and make it work if
it doesn't.)
I believe this was some kind of add-on for BBDB.
It was, making heavy use of advisements to do its job. If it isn't
broken I'd be
On Thu Apr 14 2011 David Engster wrote:
I shortly tested compilation, and it works more or less fine for GNU
Emacs22 to the latest GNU emacs-snapshot.
XEmacs is another matter, though. I attached the current logs for XEmacs
21.4 and 21.5. Note that your 'PUSHPATH' eval doesn't work for
On Sun Apr 17 2011 Nix wrote:
(I'll also see if bbdb-expire works with v3.0x and make it work if
it doesn't.)
I believe this was some kind of add-on for BBDB.
It was, making heavy use of advisements to do its job. If it isn't
broken I'd be astonished. :)
If possible, I'd like to avoid
On 17 Apr 2011, Roland Winkler stated:
On Sun Apr 17 2011 Nix wrote:
(I'll also see if bbdb-expire works with v3.0x and make it work if
it doesn't.)
I believe this was some kind of add-on for BBDB.
It was, making heavy use of advisements to do its job. If it isn't
broken I'd be
On Sun Apr 17 2011 Nix wrote:
We could do the same job with a new hook which is called only once per
record, no matter how many times it is spotted by a given call to
bbdb-update-records, or with a new guarantee that the bbdb-notice-hook
would only fire once per record per call to
Two many changes today. I lost track!
2011-04-16 Roland Winkler wink...@gnu.org
* lisp/bbdb.el (bbdb-create-hook, bbdb-change-hook): Use defvar.
--
Benefiting from Server Virtualization: Beyond Initial
13 matches
Mail list logo
