Paul G Rogers wrote these words on 08/01/06 22:17 CST:
> I'm preparing to install KDE-3.4.3 on my new LFS-6.1.1 system. The KDE
> website has a requirements page that says it needs libarts>=2.3.8. I've
> found & downloaded a tarball for libarts-2.3.11. Unpacking kdelibs, I
> find it's asking for
Paul G Rogers wrote:
I'm preparing to install KDE-3.4.3 on my new LFS-6.1.1 system. The KDE
website has a requirements page that says it needs libarts>=2.3.8. I've
found & downloaded a tarball for libarts-2.3.11. Unpacking kdelibs, I
find it's asking for aRts. I know from a prior installation
I'm preparing to install KDE-3.4.3 on my new LFS-6.1.1 system. The KDE
website has a requirements page that says it needs libarts>=2.3.8. I've
found & downloaded a tarball for libarts-2.3.11. Unpacking kdelibs, I
find it's asking for aRts. I know from a prior installation aRts creates
a libarts
On 8/1/06, Simon Geard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've traced this to their method for determining whether the user is
logged in locally to the machine (which in 1.15.0 was covered by the
--disable-multiuser config parameter). Basically, they're looking at the
utmp records, for an entry where th
I'm running Samba 3.0.21c; I keep upgrading because I keep hoping the
default file naming behavior will change but I've had the same problem
since 2.something and it hasn't changed, so I have to assume I'm doing
something wrong. Feel free to laugh at me derisively if this is
somewhere in the docs
Hi,
I have made my Exim - Dspam config file available if anyone is interested.
http://www.openmail.cc at the bottom of the page.
Ian Armstrong.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above informat
On 7/31/06, rblythe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I do not want to give up the functionality of autofs, unless there is
another alternative (I did not research alternatives to autofs).
Sounds like you fixed your problem, but I'll just mention the
alternative that you already have on your system.
On 7/31/06, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/31/06, jeeva suresh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This helped a lot, and most pages look better, but still, the
> anti-aliasing of fonts on a few pages look dodgy,
> slashdot being a major example.
>
> I was wondering which of my package(
Hi all..
Attempting to use the latest g-v-m version (2.15.0), which was released
today. Unfortunately, it terminates immediately after start, limiting
it's use somewhat.
I've traced this to their method for determining whether the user is
logged in locally to the machine (which in 1.15.0 was cove
On 7/31/06, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
the fonts installed by X and the TrueType fonts mixed in
/usr/share/fonts, or Fontconfig is set up to use the X fonts. This is
not good, and has been changed in the development book. Basically, the
X fonts are ugly, and you don't want Fontconfi
10 matches
Mail list logo
