Re: [board-discuss] Report about numbers from Apple App Store

2022-11-25 Thread Michael Meeks
On 23/11/2022 17:22, Andreas Mantke wrote: You try to mislead the audience a bit here. I see no evidence of that from Thorsten. It's not a 'donor' but a business entity from the eco system. And it is not a donation but a business deal. I've been criticized for many things, but

[board-discuss] [DISCUSS] Approve in-house developers proposal v.3.1

2022-11-25 Thread Florian Effenberger
Hello, me and many others from the team would be very happy to finally see the developer proposal come to life. We believe that would do a lot of good for TDF, its mission, and the LibreOffice community at large. It's been taking a long time, so if the board is ready to vote and trusts the

Re: [board-discuss] [DISCUSS] Approve in-house developers proposal v.3.1

2022-11-25 Thread Paolo Vecchi
Hi Florian, On 25/11/2022 14:04, Florian Effenberger wrote: Hello, me and many others from the team would be very happy to finally see the developer proposal come to life. We believe that would do a lot of good for TDF, its mission, and the LibreOffice community at large. It's been taking

Re: [board-discuss] Report about numbers from Apple App Store

2022-11-25 Thread Andreas Mantke
Hi, Am 25.11.22 um 14:02 schrieb Michael Meeks: On 23/11/2022 17:22, Andreas Mantke wrote: You try to mislead the audience a bit here. I see no evidence of that from Thorsten. It's not a 'donor' but a business entity from the eco system. And it is not a donation but a business deal.

Re: Re: [board-discuss] [DISCUSS] Approve in-house developers proposal v.3.1

2022-11-25 Thread Jan Holesovsky
> > Hi all, I have unsubscribed from this mailing list, but it was brought to my attention that Paolo claims that I have signed off the latest version of the Developers proposal. That is not true. That version is not balanced, and Paolo’s unwillingness to find balance there was one of the main

[board-discuss] Re: [VOTE] Approve in-house developers proposal v.3.1

2022-11-25 Thread Paolo Vecchi
Hi all, just a gentle reminder that the following vote has been started. Paolo On 24/11/2022 17:35, Paolo Vecchi wrote: Dear board and all, during LibOCon it has been agreed that we would iron out the divergences about the last few sentences, we would have the proposal discussed with our

[board-discuss] Re: [VOTE] Approve in-house developers proposal v.3.1

2022-11-25 Thread Paolo Vecchi
+1 Paolo On 24/11/2022 17:35, Paolo Vecchi wrote: Dear board and all, during LibOCon it has been agreed that we would iron out the divergences about the last few sentences, we would have the proposal discussed with our legal counsel and then proceed with the vote. As we went through all

[board-discuss] Agenda for TDF board meeting on Monday, November 28th, 1800 Berlin time (UTC+1)

2022-11-25 Thread Stephan Ficht
Dear Community, find below the agenda for our TDF board meeting with a public part, and followed by a private part on Monday, November 28 at 1800 Berlin time at https://jitsi.documentfoundation.org/TDFBoard For time zone conversion, see e.g.