[board-discuss] Re: [VOTE] Approve in-house developers proposal v.3.1
Hi all, Il 24/11/22 17:35, Paolo Vecchi ha scritto: -%<-- - Approve the In-House Developer Proposal v3.1 https://nextcloud.documentfoundation.org/s/qofn646Jg6bmPYB - Instruct the members of our staff led by our ED to draft the job description for 2 developers - Publish the job description - Task the members of our staff led by our ED to proceed with the interviews and selection of the best candidates - Task our ED to propose to the board the best candidates for confirmation of contracts - Task our ED to prepare and sign the relevant contracts -%<-- The vote runs 72h from now. If all full board members voted before, the vote can be concluded earlier. +1 I think the topic has been explored quite thoroughly by the Board, the community and even legal consultants (as the last step) and to me this is actionable now. Each of the stakeholders' points of view has been checked and taken into consideration; there is so much to do for underloved areas in the project that, before really getting to contentious items, I'm sure the benefit of the motion will be clear and the Team would surely be trusted to do the right thing for the project and its community (explicitly including ecosystem companies). Regards, -- Emiliano Vavassori syntaxerror...@libreoffice.org OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[board-discuss] Re: [VOTE] Approve in-house developers proposal v.3.1
Dear board, Am 24.11.22 um 17:35 schrieb Paolo Vecchi: Dear board and all, during LibOCon it has been agreed that we would iron out the divergences about the last few sentences, we would have the proposal discussed with our legal counsel and then proceed with the vote. As we went through all these stages I'm proposing the following vote: -%<-- - Approve the In-House Developer Proposal v3.1 https://nextcloud.documentfoundation.org/s/qofn646Jg6bmPYB - Instruct the members of our staff led by our ED to draft the job description for 2 developers - Publish the job description - Task the members of our staff led by our ED to proceed with the interviews and selection of the best candidates - Task our ED to propose to the board the best candidates for confirmation of contracts - Task our ED to prepare and sign the relevant contracts -%<-- The vote runs 72h from now. If all full board members voted before, the vote can be concluded earlier. With this sentence Eventual limitations related to tasks, areas, projects or bugs on which the in-house developers should not work, eg. third parties are already engaged with them, shall be regulated through separate agreements and relevant communications between TDF and the third parties. in the above In-House Developer Proposal v3.1 there is IMHO enough common ground and room for mutual understanding. So let's at least reach the quorum, please do not hide away and get one _important and urgent_ item done. Thank you all Stephan -- Stephan Ficht, Member of the Board of Trustees Affiliation: The Document Foundation -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: board-discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: https://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/board-discuss/ Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy
[board-discuss] Re: [VOTE] Approve in-house developers proposal v.3.1
+1 Paolo On 24/11/2022 17:35, Paolo Vecchi wrote: Dear board and all, during LibOCon it has been agreed that we would iron out the divergences about the last few sentences, we would have the proposal discussed with our legal counsel and then proceed with the vote. As we went through all these stages I'm proposing the following vote: -%<-- - Approve the In-House Developer Proposal v3.1 https://nextcloud.documentfoundation.org/s/qofn646Jg6bmPYB - Instruct the members of our staff led by our ED to draft the job description for 2 developers - Publish the job description - Task the members of our staff led by our ED to proceed with the interviews and selection of the best candidates - Task our ED to propose to the board the best candidates for confirmation of contracts - Task our ED to prepare and sign the relevant contracts -%<-- The vote runs 72h from now. If all full board members voted before, the vote can be concluded earlier. Ciao Paolo -- Paolo Vecchi - Member of the Board of Directors The Document Foundation, Kurfürstendamm 188, 10707 Berlin, DE Gemeinnützige rechtsfähige Stiftung des bürgerlichen Rechts Legal details: https://www.documentfoundation.org/imprint OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[board-discuss] Re: [VOTE] Approve in-house developers proposal v.3.1
Hi all, just a gentle reminder that the following vote has been started. Paolo On 24/11/2022 17:35, Paolo Vecchi wrote: Dear board and all, during LibOCon it has been agreed that we would iron out the divergences about the last few sentences, we would have the proposal discussed with our legal counsel and then proceed with the vote. As we went through all these stages I'm proposing the following vote: -%<-- - Approve the In-House Developer Proposal v3.1 https://nextcloud.documentfoundation.org/s/qofn646Jg6bmPYB - Instruct the members of our staff led by our ED to draft the job description for 2 developers - Publish the job description - Task the members of our staff led by our ED to proceed with the interviews and selection of the best candidates - Task our ED to propose to the board the best candidates for confirmation of contracts - Task our ED to prepare and sign the relevant contracts -%<-- The vote runs 72h from now. If all full board members voted before, the vote can be concluded earlier. Ciao Paolo -- Paolo Vecchi - Member of the Board of Directors The Document Foundation, Kurfürstendamm 188, 10707 Berlin, DE Gemeinnützige rechtsfähige Stiftung des bürgerlichen Rechts Legal details: https://www.documentfoundation.org/imprint OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
