Hi all,
Am 18.11.22 um 11:30 schrieb Paolo Vecchi:
(...)
(I won't comment much on the perceived attempt of delaying this
proposal further as my comments on a similar thread led to my
"conviction" for a CoC offence by the board. As I complained about the
fact that the case has been handled by
Hi Thorsten, hi all,
Am 18.11.22 um 11:31 schrieb Thorsten Behrens:
Hi all,
Andreas Mantke wrote:
If the majority of the board acts in this way further, TDF inhouse
developers will not be hired during its tenure of office.
There's no need for that level of negativity.
Rest assured, the
Hi all,
Andreas Mantke wrote:
> If the majority of the board acts in this way further, TDF inhouse
> developers will not be hired during its tenure of office.
>
There's no need for that level of negativity.
Rest assured, the board is as frustrated as everybody else with the
slow progress &
Hi all,
On 18/11/2022 10:27, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
But if there is not yet (after nine month of work) a final proposal that
could be voted on, what is missing to get to this state.
What is still missing, is a proposal that gets a majority behind
it. With Kendy's resignation, that work just
Hi Thorsten, hi all,
Am 18.11.22 um 10:27 schrieb Thorsten Behrens:
Hi Andreas, all,
Andreas Mantke wrote:
I'd like to ask if there were progress to reach a final version and vote
on this item during the meeting.
The minutes for the Monday meeting have just been posted, there was no
vote.
Hi Andreas, all,
Andreas Mantke wrote:
> I'd like to ask if there were progress to reach a final version and vote
> on this item during the meeting.
>
The minutes for the Monday meeting have just been posted, there was no
vote.
> But if there is not yet (after nine month of work) a final
