JDG wrote:
Jim Sharkey wrote:
How about them Giants?? I can't believe they turned that around, as
they were being soundly whupped for the first 40 minutes of the
game. Though I have to wonder if it's a sign of their resiliency
or the Eagles' inability to close out games.
These things happen
I've always had some admiration for Jimmy Carter, because
his speech about Human Rights resonated quite well here
in Brazil, when we were burying the dictatorship.
But I have just read now that he received bolivian president
Evo Morales - is Jimmy Carter suffering from Alzheimers, or
he doesn't
On 19/09/2006, at 10:24 PM, Alberto Monteiro wrote:
I've always had some admiration for Jimmy Carter, because
his speech about Human Rights resonated quite well here
in Brazil, when we were burying the dictatorship.
But I have just read now that he received bolivian president
Evo Morales - is
On 9/18/06, Charlie Bell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...'cause there's no such thing as something that is so well
supported it can be considered a fact. Like gravity. Just a theory.
I'm fairly certain that gravity is a fact.
How it works is a theory.
Nick
--
Nick Arnett
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
JDG wrote:
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Nick Arnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think there is an economic formula in existence
that justifies
making money in a cause for which people are giving their
very lives.
Is not the logical conclusion of this that we should have an
Charlie Bell wrote:
On 08/09/2006, at 7:16 AM, Warren Ockrassa wrote:
Probably you haven't asked the right person. I base my ethical
decisions on my ability to empathize. If I know a given action would
cause me misery, I know that it's an action I shouldn't perpetrate
upon another.
The Fool wrote:
From: John W Redelfs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I confess that I do not know as much about atheism as an atheist does, or a
least not as much that is correct. But neither do atheists know as much
about religion as religious people do, at least not as much that is
correct. Some
Julia wrote:
D. I Own more translations of the Bible than there are regulars on
this list.
Query: Can you list the translations you own? I'm just curious. A
no answer will be accepted graciously.
I was saving up qone uestion for you:
How many translations would Fool need to own for
I said:
I was saving up qone uestion for you:
That was 'one question' btw... :)
Ritu
GCU Off to Bed
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
On 18 Sep 2006 at 20:00, Dave Land wrote:
Folks,
Time and time again, the charge is leveled by one Brineller against
another that the accused would not be so outraged (at least to the point
of posting to Brin-L) over some political or religious shenanigans if
the result had favored his or
From Jeremy Zawodny's blog, great stories about smart dolphins v.
Costco employees --
http://jeremy.zawodny.com/blog/archives/007451.html
Or go to the source for the story about dolphins:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/life/feature/story/0,13026,989714,00.html
Nick
--
Nick Arnett
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 20/09/2006, at 1:01 AM, Nick Arnett wrote:
On 9/18/06, Charlie Bell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...'cause there's no such thing as something that is so well
supported it can be considered a fact. Like gravity. Just a theory.
I'm fairly certain that gravity is a fact.
How it works is a
On 9/19/06, Charlie Bell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm fairly certain that gravity is a fact.
How it works is a theory.
Finally - that's exactly what I was saying about evolution before.
Same thing.
No disagreement here.
Nick
--
Nick Arnett
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Messages: 408-904-7198
Dave Land wrote:
Comes now the case of the IRS vs. All Saints Church.
Yikes. The IRS is the Absolute Evil everywhere. I side with
whoever is against it, be it a pedophile, a taliban or Al Capone.
Alberto Monteiro
___
At 11:50 AM Tuesday 9/19/2006, Julia Thompson wrote:
The Fool wrote:
From: John W Redelfs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I confess that I do not know as much about atheism as an atheist does, or a
least not as much that is correct. But neither do atheists know as much
about religion as religious people
At 11:48 AM Tuesday 9/19/2006, Julia Thompson wrote:
Charlie Bell wrote:
On 08/09/2006, at 7:16 AM, Warren Ockrassa wrote:
Probably you haven't asked the right person. I
base my ethical decisions on my ability to
empathize. If I know a given action would
cause me misery, I know that it's
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Nick Arnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/18/06, jdiebremse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's not the language of triage, Nick. That's the language of an
abortion is just as good as any other choice.
Ever had to make a real triage decision? A life-and-death one?
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Nick Arnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How do you suppose that armies should get their food, clothing, and
boots - if not by purchasing them, at profit, from producers of
food,
clothing, and boots?
That has nothing to do with economic justification for war.
To
Ritu wrote:
That has nothing to do with economic justification for war.
To say the same thing differently, if there is such a thing as a just
war, economics isn't how it is justified.
On 20/09/2006, at 10:33 AM, jdiebremse wrote:
Somewhere the person who justified war via economics is
On 9/19/06, jdiebremse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which is precisely my point.Thanks, Nick.
But... oh, never mind.
Nick
--
Nick Arnett
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Messages: 408-904-7198
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
Charlie said:
Ritu wrote:
That has nothing to do with economic justification for war.
To say the same thing differently, if there is such a
thing as a just
war, economics isn't how it is justified.
On 20/09/2006, at 10:33 AM, jdiebremse wrote:
Somewhere the person who
On 20/09/2006, at 2:31 PM, Ritu wrote:
Charlie said:
Ritu wrote:
That has nothing to do with economic justification for war.
To say the same thing differently, if there is such a
thing as a just
war, economics isn't how it is justified.
On 20/09/2006, at 10:33 AM, jdiebremse wrote:
22 matches
Mail list logo
