Re: Mark / Barcheck Bug (#1626) Appearing Again

On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 6:38 PM, Andrew Bernard wrote: > Don't you have to provide an argument for \mark, I thought? > > I am not familiar with 2.18.2, but in 2.19.48 you do: Yep. I think \mark requiring an argument explains the errors in the examples fully: - The first

Re: Mark / Barcheck Bug (#1626) Appearing Again

After playing around with Lilypond for a while, I found out that \mark appears to "gobble up" the next token in the list. For example, \new Staff { c \mark | c c c | } and \new Staff { c c c c | c c c \mark | c | c c c c | } should give barcheck errors but don't. That's because

RE: Mark / Barcheck Bug (#1626) Appearing Again

Hi, Don't you have to provide an argument for \mark, I thought? I am not familiar with 2.18.2, but in 2.19.48 you do: Processing `/tmp/frescobaldi-pofhqya8/tmp1asznm_p/document.ly' Parsing... /tmp/frescobaldi-pofhqya8/tmp1asznm_p/document.ly:4:20: error: wrong type for argument 1.

Mark / Barcheck Bug (#1626) Appearing Again

This was mentioned about five years ago, but I re-discovered it. Does the so-called patch fix this? The bug is as follows: Placing the \mark can have an effect on the bar check. If you run Lilypond with the following code, the barcheck will fail exactly once. --- CCH \new Staff { \mark | c4 c c

Re: probably an oversight in a link on the home page

Le 15/10/2016 à 16:19, Federico Bruni a écrit : If you don't mind, and as I'm about to merge master->translation->staging, I'll take care of it. I'll also take care of the Japanese and French versions as Federico mentioned on the translation list. Ok, go ahead. Don't forget what Masamichi

Re: extra note head

2016-10-15 16:53 GMT+02:00 Jack Wilson : > Thanks for your quick reply; especially the thorough recommendations. > You're welcome. Ofcourse there were other interesting replies, especially David's, pointing to https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/185/ Cheers,

Re: flag and notehead collision with certain chords

Hi all, thanks for the replies! @Noeck > I am pretty sure that I read that this is done on purpose, that the flag > can touch the note head and that the distance of the elements of a 16th, > 32nd, etc. flag are derived from the distance of staff lines. I personally think there is a difference

Re: probably an oversight in a link on the home page

Il giorno sab 15 ott 2016 alle 15:01, Jean-Charles Malahieude ha scritto: Le 15/10/2016 à 05:00, Paul a écrit : On 10/14/2016 07:31 AM, Federico Bruni wrote: Hi Paul I think that you forgot to remove the absolute URL here. Or I'm missing something? +LilyPond is a

Re: extra note head

Noeck writes: >>> - I see no real bug here >> >> To be fair, we do have >> >> > > ... which is justified IMHO, because even though the behaviour is > understandable and follows from the way things work, it is not what

Re: extra note head

>> - I see no real bug here > > To be fair, we do have > > ... which is justified IMHO, because even though the behaviour is understandable and follows from the way things work, it is not what a users wants in most cases - I don't know

Re: probably an oversight in a link on the home page

On 10/15/2016 09:01 AM, Jean-Charles Malahieude wrote: If you don't mind, and as I'm about to merge master->translation->staging, I'll take care of it. I'll also take care of the Japanese and French versions as Federico mentioned on the translation list. That would be fine with me, thanks!

Re: extra note head

Thomas Morley writes: > 2016-10-15 6:47 GMT+02:00 Jack Wilson : >> >> % I want to be able to use chords here >> % in order to create accurate midi files >> % but if I do, the layout is wrong >> % reference: Snippets - Guitar strum rhythms >> >>

Re: probably an oversight in a link on the home page

Le 15/10/2016 à 05:00, Paul a écrit : On 10/14/2016 07:31 AM, Federico Bruni wrote: Hi Paul I think that you forgot to remove the absolute URL here. Or I'm missing something? +LilyPond is a powerful and flexible tool for engraving tasks of +all kinds, for example

Re: wrong duration

2016-10-15 6:50 GMT+02:00 Jack Wilson : >> I'm not top posting. > > \version "2.18.2" > > % layout should show default quarter notes, but > % defining variable with non-default duration > whole_rest = r1 > % impacts default duration in music expression > \relative c' { c c c c }

Re: extra note head

2016-10-15 6:47 GMT+02:00 Jack Wilson : >> I'm not top posting. > > % I want to be able to use chords here > % in order to create accurate midi files > % but if I do, the layout is wrong > % reference: Snippets - Guitar strum rhythms > > \version "2.18.2" > > \new Voice \with {