I just joined this list five minutes ago, and I've already had a message with a title
that looks as though it handles a related topic. But just in case, I'll fire this
off, as the archives are still something of an unknown quantity.
What I would like to do is this: set up a dummy server which
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003, Nicolas Kowalski wrote:
Hello.
I upgraded today my imap server (GNU/Linux) to imap-2002e. When I
tried to install the new imapd and ipop3d binaries in /usr/local/sbin,
the system complained with a text file busy, because it was handling
some IMAP connexions; fine. So I
Chris Hartmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003, Nicolas Kowalski wrote:
Hello.
I upgraded today my imap server (GNU/Linux) to imap-2002e. When I
tried to install the new imapd and ipop3d binaries in /usr/local/sbin,
the system complained with a text file busy, because it was
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 10:56:13AM -0400, Rich Graves wrote:
A read-only anonymous INBOX works fine for IMAP, and saves you from the
limitations of imapalert. However, POP3 appears to *require* a writeable
INBOX, so our POP3 users who log on to the wrong server get nothing. This
If pop
