1) I would *not *avoid that. We use the protection and have no problem at
all with it.
2) Create a filter and use it in beforeSave()? Create data objects like the
entities in Cake and filter the date there before sending?
3) No idea what you're talking about, you basically say "It's not working
Just think, how many ways are there to cook steak?
Broil, Fry, Smoke, BBQ etc. and they all taste equally as good.
For example, I have the Facebook Graph API packaged as a vendor file, and the
actual interaction with the object is handled as a Singleton. ( Tight Deadline
on that )
Another
I usually open the files myself instead of using the API online. I
usually have to go through the methods themselves to find out the
options.
I tend to use the API to find a particular method, then click on the
line number link of that method and browse the source, most things can
be
Also, the first line of the find method description says that it
returns a single row as a resultset array. That might have been true
for cake 1.1 but for 1.2 I generally use the find method for basically
any kind of read from the model, and this method if probably the one I
use most and
One of the most confusing areas of the API when pre-release versions
of cake 1.2 came out was probably the Model::find method. I think the
cookbook covers it very well, but just by looking at the api, you
wouldn't really know how to use it. A simple link to the cookbook in
the commend will
difficult
for a new user to get past.
Thanks for replying.
-Original Message-
From: cake-php@googlegroups.com [mailto:cake-...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Webweave
Sent: Friday, January 02, 2009 11:43 PM
To: CakePHP
Subject: Re: API
My experience is that you are much better off looking
-...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Webweave
Sent: Friday, January 02, 2009 11:43 PM
To: CakePHP
Subject: Re: API
My experience is that you are much better off looking at the cookbook for
that sort of information.
In a few cases the API docs are very clear as to what the options
given time I will figure this out, its just difficult
for a new user to get past.
Thanks for replying.
-Original Message-
From: cake-php@googlegroups.com [mailto:cake-...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Webweave
Sent: Friday, January 02, 2009 11:43 PM
To: CakePHP
Subject: Re
On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 3:18 PM, rhythmicde...@gmail.com
rhythmicde...@gmail.com wrote:
Ahh I dont want to be all whiny about it :)
Essentially if there are options the options should be listed.
Agreed. The API docs are a misery to wade through at times. Especially
for figuring out things
, 2009 3:43 PM
To: cake-php@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: API
On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 3:18 PM, rhythmicde...@gmail.com
rhythmicde...@gmail.com wrote:
Ahh I dont want to be all whiny about it :)
Essentially if there are options the options should be listed.
Agreed. The API docs are a misery
bitch too much about what is essentially a free framework.
-Original Message-
From: cake-php@googlegroups.com [mailto:cake-...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of brian
Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2009 3:43 PM
To: cake-php@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: API
On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 3:18 PM
I usually open the files myself instead of using the API online. I
usually have to go through the methods themselves to find out the
options.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to
On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 6:58 PM, mark_story mark.st...@gmail.com wrote:
Its not bitching if you are willing to point out where the problems
are and perhaps offer some solutions to those problems. That's called
contributing in my books. As for the API it is automatically
generated via
On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 7:36 PM, gearvOsh mileswjohn...@gmail.com wrote:
I usually open the files myself instead of using the API online. I
usually have to go through the methods themselves to find out the
options.
You can get to the source of any method by following the link,
Definition at
://us.php.net/manual/en/function.mysql-affected-rows.php
-Original Message-
From: cake-php@googlegroups.com [mailto:cake-...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of mark_story
Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2009 6:59 PM
To: CakePHP
Subject: Re: API
Its not bitching if you are willing to point
My experience is that you are much better off looking at the cookbook
for that sort of information.
In a few cases the API docs are very clear as to what the options are
and how to use them, but often it requires a lot of digging to
understand them.
What part of the API are you having trouble
Yeah, and I forgot to mention that the API docs do let you drill into
the source, so you can wade through the code if the docs aren't self-
explanatory.
The problem with the API docs, is that they are typical code generated
documentation, so it's helpful once you have an understanding of the
If you click on a class you should get a list of its methods and their
parameters. For example,
http://api.cakephp.org/class_controller.html#903188d3de83bd65c78bb676f61b3039
should take you to Controller::redirect().
And the API is generated off of the source code, so it would be very
similar
It's doxygen :)
2008/12/5 Olivier Percebois-Garve [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
yeah after some research it seems to be doxygen.
thx. Dont forgot to have a nice weekend.
Olivier
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 2:29 PM, dr. Hannibal Lecter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Good point... probably Doxygen
I'm not sure on this, but I believe it could be phpDocumentor (http://
phpdoc.org/)?
On Dec 5, 1:03 pm, Olivier Percebois-Garve [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi
What is used to generate the API doc of cakephp ?
thanks
Olivier
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received
But it looks visually so different to what I know from phpDocumentor. No
left column, etc...
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 1:47 PM, dr. Hannibal Lecter [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
I'm not sure on this, but I believe it could be phpDocumentor (http://
phpdoc.org/)?
On Dec 5, 1:03 pm, Olivier
Good point... probably Doxygen then..seems like it (look at the
examples on Doxygen site, especially the tabs)..
On Dec 5, 2:14 pm, Olivier Percebois-Garve [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
But it looks visually so different to what I know from phpDocumentor. No
left column, etc...
On Fri, Dec 5,
yeah after some research it seems to be doxygen.
thx. Dont forgot to have a nice weekend.
Olivier
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 2:29 PM, dr. Hannibal Lecter [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Good point... probably Doxygen then..seems like it (look at the
examples on Doxygen site, especially the tabs)..
On
Hi,
This one is in html format, with tree navigation bar.Hope it would help
http://sudhir.wordpress.com/2008/07/17/cakephp-1207296-rc2-api-refrence-html/
Regards,
Sudhir
Wisnu Manupraba wrote:
dear,
where can I get api 1.2 documentation di chm or pdf format? because
i'm not online 24
Try searching in this group, as there used to be one, but I think it's
outdated, whereas the online API provides code coverage for the recent
RC2 release.
On Jul 14, 10:43 pm, Wisnu Manupraba [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
dear,
where can I get api 1.2 documentation di chm or pdf format? because
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 1:23 PM, Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Try searching in this group, as there used to be one, but I think it's
outdated, whereas the online API provides code coverage for the recent
RC2 release.
yup, i need the latest release one
On Jul 14, 10:43 pm, Wisnu
I'm sure the developers will release it as soon as Day 2.0 is
released. You know, the one with 26 hours instead of 24.
I agree that this would be a good thing to have, but instead of just
demanding it, why don't you offer to put in some of the work needed to
create it?
On Jul 14, 11:29 pm,
If you have Adobe Acrobat or something similar installed you can just
go to book.cakephp.org and hit File - Print - Adobe PDF... Instead
of sending it to your default printer. But make sure you select the
all on one page option in the manual first. Usually ends up being a
6 or 7 MB pdf from what
Olá turma,
Resolvi o problema!
Primeiro eu peguei uma página de exemplo do Google e colei no lugar do
layout (substituindo assim tudo que eu e o cake fizemos). Funcionou
perfeitamente. Então fui substituindo gradualmente o código estático pelo
código gerado pelo cake e eu até que cheguei a
Olá pessoal,
Bom, deixa eu atualizar as informações que tenho, assim vocês vão poder me
ajudar melhor e, no futuro protegerem-se desse problema.
Como havia comentado, o problema ocorre em operas anteriores ou iguais ao
9.25 (acho que é a maioria da base instalada -- incluindo o Opera do
Nintendo
Olha, olhando rapidamente no Google, parece que o pessoal não tem
problemas com o GoogleMaps com Opera, ou seja, deve ser na parte que
você fez. :)
Portanto, acho que sem ver o código fica meio difícil de ajudar.
Juan Basso
On 13 fev, 14:06, Josenivaldo Benito Junior [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Oi Juan,
Que foi na parte que eu fiz ou que é alguma incompatibilidade com scripts do
cake (acho difícil) não há dúvidas. Eu pedi uns browser shots (
http://www.brownsershots.org - fantástico) do meu site e do
http://maps.google.com para ver como ficava. Com isso descobri que o Google
Maps
I looked all over for there doxyfile. I would love to see it as they
somehow (my guess though alieses) support several phpdoc only style
comments..
David
On Sep 7, 6:52 am, MarkH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 6, 4:53 pm, djiize [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Where did you see it was parsed
On Sep 6, 4:53 pm, djiize [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Where did you see it was parsed by Doxygen?
I still use PHPDocumentor, and I remember a post from phpNut saying it
was parsed by this tool...http://www.phpdoc.org/
Because the HTML contains...
!-- Generated by Doxygen 1.5.2 --
and
Where did you see it was parsed by Doxygen?
I still use PHPDocumentor, and I remember a post from phpNut saying it
was parsed by this tool...
http://www.phpdoc.org/
On 6 sep, 16:00, MarkH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm investigating the use of Doxygen / PHPDocumentor with Cake
programs.
Wow! Fast work, gwoo and John. That is most helpful. You guys rock.
Thank you.
Best regards,
Ralph
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Cake
PHP group.
To post to this group, send email to
Much better now !
Thanks
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Cake
PHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL
All I did was file the ticket.I don't do any actual work :-)Thanks gwoo/nate.On 8/16/06,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wow! Fast work, gwoo and John. That is most helpful. You guys rock.Thank you.Best regards,Ralph
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received
Ralph thanks for sparking the fire and submitting some styles.
John the ticket was needed, thanks for adding it.
The time needed to fix it was trivial, the reason to fix it was not.
Bake on.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are
In the prior message, I meant to write, with no visible separation
between methods above and below the desired method.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Cake
PHP group.
To post to this group, send
We don't respond to requests or bugs posted here. You can open a
ticket at https://trac.cakephp.org/
Thanks.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Cake
PHP group.
To post to this group, send email to
Donehttps://trac.cakephp.org/ticket/1321On 8/15/06, nate
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:We don't respond to requests or bugs posted here.You can open a
ticket at https://trac.cakephp.org/Thanks.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are
Thank you for entering that ticket, John.
I meant to write that you can see a sample of the improved appearance
at
http://jengels.maxsoft.com/test/
versus the existing page at
http://api.cakephp.org/class_controller.html
(The top of my sample page is not rendered correctly. I didn't bother
Gwoo updated the stylesheet already.http://api.cakephp.org/class_controller.htmlRefresh your the page if it doesn't show up.I marked it as trivial because it did not present a security concern or logical error in a code example that could lead to unworkable code (which can be very frustrating
44 matches
Mail list logo
