* *
* RTA 2009 *
* Rewriting Techniques and Applications*
* 20th International Conference
The Win64 port is listed as requiring Windows XP 64 or Server 64 - is 64 bit
Windows Vista not included in the list because it's not supported or because
it's not been tested with it?
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Damien Doligez
I observe that ocamlbuild does not build cmx cmi and o files from a ml
file (which has no associated mli) directly. Do others see different
behavior? Instead it builds cmo and cmi from the ml using ocamlc, and
then builds the cmx and o files from there using ocamlopt. Is there a
reason I’m
There is a deep reason for this, the short answer is:
if you want native-compilation only, then all your .ml files must have a
.mli
Indeed ocamlbuild only generates .cmi from .ml using ocamlc, this is to avoid
conflicting defaulting rules in the engine.
Are conflicting rules a problem?
Apologies if I missed them, but are there any installation instructions for
flexdll for Win32 building OCaml 3.11? I copied flexdll.h,
flexdll_initer_mingw.o, flexdll_mingw.o and flexlink.exe to my (empty) OCaml
bin directory (C:\Dev\OCaml\bin which is in PATH) before starting to build
which
I'm slowly testing my stuff on WinXP SP2 and will do Windows Vista SP1 (both
MinGW build).
Very much looking forward to adding plug-in support back into two products
now that native Dynlink is available so many thanks to the OCaml team for
the work on this release!
Both the MSVC and MinGW ports
David Allsopp wrote:
The install target of flexdll's Makefile suggests copying:
flexdll_initer.c, flexdll.c
Surely these aren't needed once it's compiled?
Indeed. However, some people might want to recompile them (e.g. to keep
debug symbols, or to use a specific version of their C
See this post on beginner's list:
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners/message/6905
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 4:14 PM, Harrison, John R [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
This discussion of dynamic loading in 3.11 reminded me of a more basic
question I meant to ask, but never did. On
Hi,
The manual states that implementation files are not handled
because if you have a .ml and .mli then ocamlbuild will choose
the .mli.
Thanks for the info. You may want to clarify that on the manual,
because presently the language implies that implementation files
are ignored altogether.
Thanks for your answer; now I'll try to sate my point in a clear way,
since you misunderstood all my questions.
I put 'a in the interface:
val fu : 'a - 'a
and int in the implementation:
let fu x = x + 1
this interface doesn't reflect the implementation, ocaml will reject it in any
way
OK,
2008/10/16, Alain Frisch [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
David Allsopp wrote:
There seems to be an interesting chicken-and-egg source dependency between
flexdll and OCaml 3.11 - you can't build OCaml 3.11 from source or use it
afterwards without flexdll and you can't build flexdll from source without
Adrien wrote:
How often should we expect new releases of flexlink ? Basically, the
question is : will it have to be updated from time to time or can we
just drop it somewhere and forget everything about it ?
There will be new releases when bugs are found and fixed. It's hard to
predict. I
On Oct 16, 2008, at 5:58 AM, David Allsopp wrote:
Both the MSVC and MinGW ports seem to have an error in the Makefile -
they're linking against tk83.dll and tcl83.dll - the OCaml 3.10.2
line to
link against tk84.lib and tcl84.lib is commented out.
Changing the Makefile to link against
On Oct 16, 2008, at 12:22 PM, Andres Varon wrote:
On Oct 16, 2008, at 5:58 AM, David Allsopp wrote:
Both the MSVC and MinGW ports seem to have an error in the Makefile -
they're linking against tk83.dll and tcl83.dll - the OCaml 3.10.2
line to
link against tk84.lib and tcl84.lib is
On Oct 16, 2008, at 12:31 PM, Andres Varon wrote:
Changing the Makefile to link against tk84.dll and tcl84.dll seems
to fix
the problem.
Did you manage to do it with *.dll or *.lib? I don't have those
dll's and have been unable to compile the MinGW port with a setup
that succeeded
Yes you are right my first answer was totally out of scope,
I will try to make it forgive and forget with this new one :)
Still take it with care while it seems you are far more knowledged than me
to answer to your own question ;-)
Just an elementary question.
I put 'a in the interface:
val
16 matches
Mail list logo
