I've been looking at the ADC1x5000-8 board (which I assume is the same as the
ASIAA board) . In the data sheet for the the EV8AQ160 they show that
full-bandwidth is 2-GHz but then fail to give performance for ENOB, SNR, etc
above 620-MHz. Does anyone know what ENOB/SNR is at 2-GHz?
Thanks,
Hi Bill,
There are measurements of the PCB with EV8AQ160 installed near DC posted on our
Wiki:
https://www.cfa.harvard.edu/twiki/bin/view/SMAwideband/MeasuringAndSettingParametersOfTheFourCores
The plots are in terms of SINAD, linearly transformed to ENOB as follows.
ENOB = (SINAD-1.76)/6.02
ROACH1 to ROACH2?
Thanks,
-Bill.
From: Jonathan Weintroub jweintr...@cfa.harvard.edu
To: Bill Petrachenko wtpe...@yahoo.ca
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2012 12:00:13 PM
Subject: Re: [casper] 1-2 GHz sampler
Hi Bill,
Thanks, I was a bit mixed up and this does
Werthimer d...@ssl.berkeley.edu; Casper Casper@lists.berkeley.edu
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 9:19:48 AM
Subject: Re: [casper] 1-2 GHz sampler
MeerKAT's going to be using a 10-bit 1.8Gsps monolithic part. You won't quite
get 1GHz bandwidth, but 900 is close. The ADC itself will do 2.2Gsps
-ADC. Has this come to pass or has it become apparent
that neither are required?
Many thanks,
-Bill.
*From:* Dan Werthimer d...@ssl.berkeley.edu
*To:* Bill Petrachenko wtpe...@yahoo.ca
*Sent:* Monday, May 28, 2012 11:21:40 PM
*Subject:* Re: [casper] 1-2 GHz sampler
the kat-adc has two
...@ssl.berkeley.edu
To: Bill Petrachenko wtpe...@yahoo.ca
Sent: Monday, May 28, 2012 11:21:40 PM
Subject: Re: [casper] 1-2 GHz sampler
the kat-adc has two different front end fiilter options.
make sure to order the filter option for high frequency.
dan
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 7:19 PM, Bill
: Dan Werthimer d...@ssl.berkeley.edu
To: Bill Petrachenko wtpe...@yahoo.ca
Sent: Monday, May 28, 2012 11:21:40 PM
Subject: Re: [casper] 1-2 GHz sampler
the kat-adc has two different front end fiilter options.
make sure to order the filter option for high frequency.
dan
On Mon, May 28, 2012
Hi Ryan,
We'd be interested in learning more about your interleave-fixing technique
as well. If JPL will let you tell us about it that would be great. If
you can't release detailed code/etc, even a high-level description of the
approach would be nice.
Cheers,
Paul
On Mon, 28 May 2012,
For the ASIAA designed 8-bit ADC using e2v EV8AQ160 at 5GS/s we at CfA (chiefly
Bob Wilson, Nimesh Patel and Rurik Primiani) have done a fair amount of testing
using both swept sine waves and wideband noise as input. There are
measurements of frequency response, SFDR, THD, noise power ratio,
For the ASIAA designed 8-bit ADC using e2v EV8AQ160 at 5GS/s we at CfA (chiefly
Bob Wilson, Nimesh Patel and Rurik Primiani) have done a fair amount of testing
using both swept sine waves and wideband noise as input. There are
measurements of frequency response, SFDR, THD, noise power ratio,
Ryan,
As Jonathan said, we have been testing the adc1x5000-8. I would also like
to hear about your approach. We don't see such large core-to-core
differences as you suggest and the improvements I have been able to achieve
have been minimal from the point of view of a radio astronomy correlator.
I wouldn't be surprised if Ryan has a more clever way to do it, but
one option is to use an extension of the method that Matt Morgan and
Rick Fisher (i.e. http://www.gb.nrao.edu/electronics/edir/edir320.pdf)
developed for I/Q imbalance compensation. Basically you make a
filterbank with each of the
Thanks for the references. I have been planning to implement a compass
search when we have more ADCs and I get back to evaluating them. Since our
4 cores are all on the same chip, the cores were more matched and I had a
much smaller improvement in SFDR.
Bob
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 1:50 PM,
hi bill,
i think all the boards you mention have analog bandwidth out to 2 GHz,
so they should work well for your 1-2 GHz band.
the asiaa board is the least expensive, but this board does not have
programmable
attenuators like the Kat-ADC. the asiaa board can be used as a single
5 Gsps ADC, or
I've used the ADC083000s before and the interleave can be pretty bad--
as much as 15% difference across their 3GHz spectrum! You should expect
better performance because you only need to tune for 1GHz of bandwidth
however. I can't speak for the other parts.
I have a technique I've developed
I'm designing a digital data acquisition system using a ROACH1 board. I need to
sample two Nyquist zones at 1024-2048 MHz. It appears that in the Casper group
of products, a pair of ASIAA, ADC1x3000-8, or KatADC boards would work well and
nicely interfaced to a single ROACH1 board (although the
16 matches
Mail list logo