On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 11:17 AM, Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com wrote:
On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 22:26 +, ant elder wrote:
Looking at whats been said its quite evenly split with about half
saying RTC could be ok and half suggesting RTC should be frowned upon.
So what to do?
The Cassandra PPMC has voted to add Johan Oskarsson as a committer to
the Cassandra incubator project. Welcome, Johan -- or more correctly,
thanks for your hard work! :)
-Jonathan
I'd propose to wait for a short while (until Monday or so). I think
there are some issues with bootstrapping (discussed with Jonathan
yesterday) and some of the things in CHANGES.txt are currently not
true. I'm working on bootstrap/move issues currently, so I'd propose
to wait to fix most obvious
+1 on releasing a beta.
Things can always be improved, and IMO it's time to get more people
testing / benchmarking the 0.5 codebase, which even where it is still
rough is much better than 0.4.
-Jonathan
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 8:14 PM, Jaakko rosvopaalli...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd propose to wait
I feel like at this point we are throwing good time after bad waiting
for 193/520 before beta 1. 193 is getting close, pending Jun's
review, but it's not useful without 520 which is just getting started
if I am not mistaken.
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 10:43 PM, Stu Hood stuart.h...@rackspace.com
+1 lets get a beta out, we can always merge in #193, but I do agree we need
a lot of testing for 193 ;-)
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 8:52 PM, Jonathan Ellis jbel...@gmail.com wrote:
I feel like at this point we are throwing good time after bad waiting
for 193/520 before beta 1. 193 is getting
