Dear all,
As we know, when a modelbuild procedure finish(such as buccaneer), we can open
the input and output pdb/mtz file directly in qtRView interface by click the
Coot/ccp4mg/Display button.
And now, I am revising the OASIS package and hope that the intermediate
results(e.g.: circle1.pdb,
Dear All,
Thank you very much for your suggestions.
I will refine the structure and keep you updated.
Khoa
Hi Khoa,
How many rounds of refine and rebuild have you gone through on the graphics?
Have you tried Lorestr in CCP4 (Automated refinement of macromolecular
structures at low resolution using prior information, Oleg Kovalevskiy, Robert
A. Nicholls and Garib N. Murshudov).
Ben
[At 2.9A
The R factors may be high because the structure is imperfect - almost
inevitable at that resolution - but also there are often serious
difficulties with scaling at this resolution . If you are using REFMAC look
at the v wrt resolution plot at the end of refinement (follows R
and Rfree plot v
Hi Steve,
Have you tried CASTp server (http://sts.bioe.uic.edu/castp/). That should help
you to compare the shape of the ligand-binding sites.
Best wishes,
Avinash
Dear CCP4 members,
I am refining a structure with a resolution of ~ 2.9 A and the Rwork/Rfree are
are 0.34/0.37, respectively.
My question is that these Rwork/Rfree are acceptable for publication. If not,
how can I reduce them?
Thank you.
Khoa
The table of statics.
Space group
C121
If you dont use Phenix, print the figures of
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-2126(02)00743-8
and use them beside your screen. Helps a lot if you wanna have a quick look at
Rfact distributions..
>>> Paul Emsley 14.06.17 15.25 Uhr >>>
On 14/06/2017 14:09, Khoa Pham
Difficult to guess from what is visible of the protein but is this density on a
two-fold axis?
Or, it could be Slimer the ghost...
Cheers,
Nukri
Ruslan Sanishvili (Nukri), Ph.D.
Macromolecular Crystallographer
GM/CA@APS
X-ray Science Division, ANL
9700 S. Cass Ave.
Lemont, IL 60439
Tel:
Dear CCP4bb,
I recently solved the 2.0 Å crystal structure of a small hydrophobic
molecule bound to a protein. A glutamine sidechain nitrogen is positioned
~3.3-3.4 Å from a double bond in the small molecule acyl chain. Could this
be a similar interaction to the X-H (where X-H is an H-bond
On 14/06/2017 14:09, Khoa Pham wrote:
Dear CCP4 members,
I am refining a structure with a resolution of ~ 2.9 A and the Rwork/Rfree are are
0.34/0.37, respectively.
My question is that these Rwork/Rfree are acceptable for publication.
If you have Phenix, try POLYGON. That will give you a
Hi Stephen,
I've had some luck calculating ligand-binding cavity volume with the 3v
website (http://3vee.molmovdb.org/). You might want to give it a shot.
Best,
Chris
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 12:42 PM, <
stephen.c...@rc-harwell.ac.uk> wrote:
> Dear ccp4bb,
>
> I am trying to compare the shape
Yes, it very well could be, the distance is pretty typical for this kind of
weak, "non-cannonical" hydrogen bond. However, directionality is an
important aspect of hydrogen bonding and its hard to say if this is a
reasonable bond without a (small filesize so no one's inbox gets
overloaded)
The international PhD program of the Biozentrum, University of Basel,
Switzerland, is open for applications until June, 20th.
We encourage highly motivated students looking for an opportunity to carry out
excellent structural biology research to apply now to the Biozentrum PhD
program.
The
Dear all,
what is the relationship between <4SSQ/LL> and resolution?
In refmac logfile, there is a table:
<4SSQ/LL> NREFa FOMa NREFc FOMc NREFall FOMall SigmaA_Fc1 FSCfree FSCwork
CorrFoFcFree CorrFoFcWork$$
$$
0.0065130 0.894171 0.872301 0.882 0.734 0.8235 0.8078
First thing to check - is there any anomalous scatterer peak in the
density?
Easy to do an anom diff map from GUI2 - choose REFMAC and add - do anom
diff fourier, then follow with a diff peak search in COOT .
Eleanor
On 14 June 2017 at 18:04, Sanishvili, Ruslan wrote:
>
Flying spaghetti monster. Ramen!
Sorry. Could not resist.
Artem
www.harkerbio.com
"...touched by His Noodly Appendage"
On Jun 14, 2017 12:51 PM, "Nick Thomas" wrote:
Dear CCP4bb,
I am refining a structure and have come across strong electron density for
an unknown
4(sin theta/lambda)^2 = 1/d^2
> On 14 Jun 2017, at 09:30, Wei Ding wrote:
>
> Dear all,
> what is the relationship between <4SSQ/LL> and resolution?
> In refmac logfile, there is a table:
> <4SSQ/LL> NREFa FOMa NREFc FOMc NREFall FOMall SigmaA_Fc1 FSCfree
> FSCwork
Got it, thank you very much.
--
Wei Ding
P.O.Box 603
The Institute of Physics,Chinese Academy of Sciences
Beijing,China
100190
Tel: +86-10-82649083
E-mail: ding...@iphy.ac.cn
At 2017-06-14 16:54:23, "Phil Evans" wrote:
>4(sin theta/lambda)^2 = 1/d^2
>
>> On 14
Dear colleagues,
We are pleased to announce the International Cryo-EM Symposium that will take
place from 4-5 September 2017 in Delft, the Netherlands.
With the aim to share the latest developments in 3D cryo-electron microscopy
(EM) with scientists and students at the Delft University of
Dear ccp4bb,
I am trying to compare the shape of a ligand binding site in my protein with
that of some homologues and mutants and was wondering how others go about this?
I specifically want to compare the shapes of the surface (similar to an sc
analysis of an interface) rather than the
20 matches
Mail list logo