John wrote:
Just as an
equal opertunity that the centos core members would want there name on
updated packages. IE The Package Builder.
umm not true.
We dont have Packager set on any CentOS4/5 rpms anymore - anything that
comes through the buildsystem does not have that. We used to set
Manuel Wolfshant wrote:
vserver is quite popular, especially among debian admins and even among
hosting companies, so I am very much in favor of publishing this article.
Has anyone made contact with the admin / packager at the mentioned repo ?
--
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ :
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 11:26 AM, Karanbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Manuel Wolfshant wrote:
vserver is quite popular, especially among debian admins and even among
hosting companies, so I am very much in favor of publishing this article.
Has anyone made contact with the admin / packager
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 4:12 PM, Ned Slider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That should block the vast majority of spam, shouldn't it?
On a Dutch forum we were dealing with a considerable amount of spam.
Most spam account creation/posting is done automatically through
scripts. So, we simply added an
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 2:54 PM, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aggree..I would like for the Authors name and Co-Authored names to remain on
the article they have written.
Since many people feel this is important, maybe we should. But I'd
propose to include a note somewhere on the Wiki that it
TAIRA Hajime wrote:
How did you reboot your windows server domain?
If you rebooted by Windows operation, You had to be a restart by cold boot.
Please check xm log command after turn on the domain.
You will be able to check failure log.
Thanks TAIRA for responding..
I'm getting this in the
Hola a todos
Les diré que tengo Centos 4 como servidor... Y todo funcionaba bien , hasta
la semana pasada, que de buenas a primera, comenzó a darme error en la
caché.. Pensé que se había dañado, la elimine y reconstruí con el webmin (
nada ) la elimine a mano ( nada), le aumente el tamaño de
Hola amigos de la Lista
Instale Centos 5.1 en RAID 1 , el equipo es un equipo PC compatible, con un
controlador raid integrado a la placa intel, y dos disco iguales SATA,
procesadores Quad Core de Intel, y 4 GB de ram, se instalo bien, se hizo un
yum update y realizo todo correctamente, salvo que
--- On Thu, 5/29/08, Hector Martínez Romo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Hector Martínez Romo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [CentOS-es] squid
To: centos-es@centos.org
Received: Thursday, May 29, 2008, 6:00 PM
Estimados
Producto del limite de file-descriptor he decido
desinstalar en
Todo resuelto, ya tengo instalado un servidor de correo Postfix+Dovecot.
Ahora voy para Spamassasing y Clamav así que nos veremos pronto.
Saludos
Abelardo
___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
William L. Maltby wrote:
I have a Firefox3 beta3 rpm for CentOS-4 that works in parallel with the
distro firefox. once Firefox3 is released upstream I will get that built
for CentOS-4 and put that in the CentOS Plus repo.
JIC you might have an interest (saves work later, more stable than
Jerry Geis wrote:
I have found this link http://owlriver.com/tips/tiny-centos
for installing centos on a minimal system. I am looking at putting
centos on a 1 GIG flash drive. The above page talks about removing
packages after install to attain the small size.
however, I am getting blocked
Balaji wrote:
After some changes the Linux Boot-Up Progress bar Show Details Menu
when i enable the Menu it will not shows the start-up services
details.
When the grub menu appears, press a key to interrupt the countdown
timer. Then press e to edit the default boot kernel settings.
Dear All,
I have Installed CentOS 4.4 Linux and Linux Boot-Up Progress bar
Show Details Menu
when i enable the Menu it shows the start-up services details.
Then i have done some changes in Linux but i am forgotten the changes.
After some changes the Linux Boot-Up Progress bar Show
Joe Pruett wrote:
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2853
thanks. i had looked in the upstream bugzilla and not found anything
obvious, but didn't think to look at the centos bug database. i'll
remember that for next time.
we tried to get that note included in the update release
William L. Maltby wrote:
IIRC, there are several threads about this on the site. I *think* it was
that you need to also unselect individual packages to get a truly
minimal install. Check out the archives.
correct, and you need to run the GUI installer..
--
Karanbir Singh :
Mag Gam wrote:
I am planning to implement GFS for my university as a summer project. I
have 10 servers each with SAN disks attached.
GFS works well, gfs2 is at the moment in technology-preview mode only,
but its still worth looking at.
--
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : [EMAIL
On Tue, 27 May 2008 21:51:07 -0400
WLM == William L Maltby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
WLM On Tue, 2008-05-27 at 17:19 -0700, MHR wrote:
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 5:02 PM, Robert Spangler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can I use one out of the Fedora's repos? If so, which repo?
We have kernel support for IPv6 in Centos, but not stateful firewall
support.
That requires at least the 2.6.20 kernel, which means Fedora Core 6 or
some other Linux distro.
None of the various free Linux firewalls have IPv6 support. Supposedly
FWBuilder can manage Netfilters for a Linux
Good morning,
I've inherited an old laptop from my wife that I'd like to
use when I travel (it's fairly small with a 12 screen). The
bad part is that it is maxed out on memory with 384MB.
Has anyone played with using Centos5 on systems with
little memory? Ideally, I don't need too much -
IMO, CentOS is not a good choice for old hardware with small amounts of
ram, esp since the apps you want to use (Fx2 and OoO) are notorious for
being profligate with ram.
If no-one here can point you to a Redhat-based distro with modest
requirements, you could check out Zenwalk, which uses XFCE.
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 1:31 AM, Stephen John Smoogen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It will depend upon if Red Hat will release a version for Red Hat
Enterprise Linux. The best bet will be that they will not release it
until RHEL-4.7 goes into beta testing.
It looks like there is a good chance it
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can
On Thursday 29 May 2008 12:31:17 Jeffrey B. Layton wrote:
Good morning,
I've inherited an old laptop from my wife that I'd like to
use when I travel (it's fairly small with a 12 screen). The
bad part is that it is maxed out on memory with 384MB.
Has anyone played with using Centos5 on
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 07:31:17AM -0400, Jeffrey B. Layton wrote:
Good morning,
I've inherited an old laptop from my wife that I'd like to
use when I travel (it's fairly small with a 12 screen). The
bad part is that it is maxed out on memory with 384MB.
Has anyone played with using Centos5
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeffrey B. Layton wrote:
I've inherited an old laptop from my wife that I'd like to
use when I travel (it's fairly small with a 12 screen). The
bad part is that it is maxed out on memory with 384MB.
Has anyone played with using Centos5 on systems
Hi
Is there any way to re-export an nfs mounted directory? I am having three
servers runnning on centos4.5 and i am trying to implement nfs share in an
below manner [bcoz there is no alternative way for me to setup nfs share]
HOST A---EXPORTS /prod/data ---HOST B
HOST B MOUNTED --
On Thursday 29 May 2008 13:22:15 Wojtek Pilorz wrote:
I'd also like it to work with the existing wireless
card (Dlink DWL-G650). Any thoughts or recommendations?
No idea here.
I'm fairly sure I've seen a how-to for that, so it's worth googling. I may
have a printout with a url, but I
Jeffrey B. Layton wrote:
Good morning,
I've inherited an old laptop from my wife that I'd like to
use when I travel (it's fairly small with a 12 screen). The
bad part is that it is maxed out on memory with 384MB.
Has anyone played with using Centos5 on systems with
little memory? Ideally, I
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Robert Moskowitz
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 4:42 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: [CentOS] PPPoE client help
Please point me in the right direction
My ISP is giving me an IPv6 prefix, but to get
Alfred von Campe wrote:
On May 28, 2008, at 14:08, Johnny Hughes wrote:
We are currently using the builders to build centos-5.2 ... I can try
to get the that kernel in, but we should very soon thereafter have
the 5.2 one, so it might be better for you just to wait.
Does the 5.2 kernel
Jeffrey B. Layton wrote:
Good morning,
I've inherited an old laptop from my wife that I'd like to
use when I travel (it's fairly small with a 12 screen). The
bad part is that it is maxed out on memory with 384MB.
Has anyone played with using Centos5 on systems with
little memory? Ideally, I
Joe Pruett wrote:
On Tue, 27 May 2008, Joe Pruett wrote:
so, has anyone seen ipsec get messed up with the latest kernel?
i have verified that dropping back to the 53.1.19 kernel makes ipsec
function again. with the new 5.2 kernel coming soon, i'm not sure if it
makes sense to try and
Hi list,
Is it possible to set up an NFSv4/Kerberos environment on CentOS 5.1?
I set up Kerberos and NFS but get several erros
Warning: rpc.gssd appears not to be running.
mount.nfs4: Permission denied
Is this an CentOS oder an config problem?
Greetings
Sebastian
signature.asc
Description:
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 02:12:38PM +0100, Ned Slider wrote:
Jeffrey B. Layton wrote:
Good morning,
I've inherited an old laptop from my wife that I'd like to
use when I travel (it's fairly small with a 12 screen). The
bad part is that it is maxed out on memory with 384MB.
Has anyone played
We start to use centos 5 for our workstation at our site (University Innsbruck)
and we use openafs to hold the home directories. There would be a big advantage
to have the openafs kernel module (and the additional rpms) in the centos
extras (or addons) repository with an automatic compile for the
Jeffrey B. Layton scribbled on Thursday, May 29, 2008 1:31 PM:
I use CentOS 5.1 with 256M RAM (incl X, Gnome, Firefox etc and the proprietary
Nvidia 3D gfx drivers. Yes I know it's overkill, but it's so much nicer and
easier to move around stuff using a file manager instead of doing it on the
Markus Hetzenecker wrote:
We start to use centos 5 for our workstation at our site (University Innsbruck)
and we use openafs to hold the home directories. There would be a big advantage
to have the openafs kernel module (and the additional rpms) in the centos
extras (or addons) repository with
Quoting Sebastian Marten [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi list,
Is it possible to set up an NFSv4/Kerberos environment on CentOS 5.1?
I set up Kerberos and NFS but get several erros
Warning: rpc.gssd appears not to be running.
mount.nfs4: Permission denied
Is this an CentOS oder an config problem?
Quoting whoami i [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi
Is there any way to re-export an nfs mounted directory? I am having three
servers runnning on centos4.5 and i am trying to implement nfs share in an
below manner [bcoz there is no alternative way for me to setup nfs share]
Did you add the options
On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 14:12 +0100, Ned Slider wrote:
Jeffrey B. Layton wrote:
Good morning,
I've inherited an old laptop from my wife that I'd like to
use when I travel (it's fairly small with a 12 screen). The
bad part is that it is maxed out on memory with 384MB.
Has anyone played
I am looking for the servercd for i386 centos 5.1 on the mirrors.
Not finding it though.
Can someone point me to it. Thanks,
Jerry
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 9:11 AM, MHR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 2:41 AM, Ralph Angenendt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Answer: When it's ready.
Suits me - I have a different question (and it's probably up somewhere
I don't have time to look at the
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 9:11 AM, MHR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 2:41 AM, Ralph Angenendt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Answer: When it's ready.
Suits me - I have a different question (and it's probably up somewhere
I
Jerry Geis wrote:
I am looking for the servercd for i386 centos 5.1 on the mirrors.
Not finding it though.
Can someone point me to it. Thanks,
Jerry
There is currently no serverCD for CentOS 5.1, but you can install from
just the first CD if that helps. See here:
Jerry Geis wrote:
/ I am looking for the servercd for i386 centos 5.1 on the mirrors.
// Not finding it though.
//
// Can someone point me to it. Thanks,
//
// Jerry
/
There is currently no serverCD for CentOS 5.1, but you can install from
just the first CD if that helps. See here:
Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 9:11 AM, MHR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 2:41 AM, Ralph Angenendt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Answer: When it's ready.
Suits me - I have a different question (and it's
Jerry Geis wrote:
I am trying to install centos i386 on a ebox 2300 unit.
This unit has a vortex86 CPU.
When installing the unit finds the USB cdrom I type linux text and it
starts
vlinuz...
init
Screen goes black and the unit reboots.
Sounds like an i586 CPU which is not supported
Hi, I just had a couple of questions about nfsnobody.
We run a very large NFS infrastructure based off of a NetApp, and we're
been discussing whether or not it is necessary to have 64 bit nfsnobody
as 4294967294. I understand the reasoning behind this (2^32 - 2 gives
you a max UID), but
Jerry Geis wrote:
/ I am trying to install centos i386 on a ebox 2300 unit.
// This unit has a vortex86 CPU.
// When installing the unit finds the USB cdrom I type linux text and it
// starts
// vlinuz...
// init
// Screen goes black and the unit reboots.
/
Sounds like an i586 CPU which
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 11:46:53AM -0400, Jerry Geis wrote:
/
// I am trying to install centos i386 on a ebox 2300 unit.
/http://www.embeddedpc.net/eBox2300/tabid/110/Default.aspx ?
you won't make it with only 128 MB of RAM...
is the cpu i686 compatible?
Tru
Tru,
yes this is the box I
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 11:46:53AM -0400, Jerry Geis wrote:
I am trying to install centos i386 on a ebox 2300 unit.
http://www.embeddedpc.net/eBox2300/tabid/110/Default.aspx ?
you won't make it with only 128 MB of RAM...
is the cpu i686 compatible?
Tru
--
Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 12:38:38PM -0400, Jerry Geis wrote:
...
yes this is the box I am trying to install on...
I dont know if its i686, either way I thought i386 should work. I am I
wrong?
yes, the i686 has some additionnal instructions that a i586 does not
have. I have no idea about the
Jerry Geis wrote:
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 11:46:53AM -0400, Jerry Geis wrote:
/ // I am trying to install centos i386 on a ebox 2300 unit.
/http://www.embeddedpc.net/eBox2300/tabid/110/Default.aspx ?
you won't make it with only 128 MB of RAM...
is the cpu i686 compatible?
yes this is the
on 5-29-2008 4:55 AM Daniel de Kok spake the following:
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 1:31 AM, Stephen John Smoogen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It will depend upon if Red Hat will release a version for Red Hat
Enterprise Linux. The best bet will be that they will not release it
until RHEL-4.7 goes into
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 4:31 AM, Jeffrey B. Layton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good morning,
I've inherited an old laptop from my wife that I'd like to
use when I travel (it's fairly small with a 12 screen). The
bad part is that it is maxed out on memory with 384MB.
Has anyone played with using
Jerry Geis wrote:
/
// On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 11:46:53AM -0400, Jerry Geis wrote:
// / // I am trying to install centos i386 on a ebox 2300 unit.
// /http://www.embeddedpc.net/eBox2300/tabid/110/Default.aspx ?
//
// you won't make it with only 128 MB of RAM...
// is the cpu i686 compatible?
//
Jerry Geis wrote:
Jerry Geis wrote:
/
// On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 11:46:53AM -0400, Jerry Geis wrote:
// / // I am trying to install centos i386 on a ebox 2300 unit.
// /http://www.embeddedpc.net/eBox2300/tabid/110/Default.aspx ?
//
// you won't make it with only 128 MB of RAM...
// is the cpu
I'm trying to build GNOME (to run a more recent version than 2.16.* on
CentOS 5.1) and I keep running into a lot of rather strange problems.
I'm wondering if this might have something to do with my hybrid 64 and
32 bit general environment, so I want to try a pure 64-bit chroot.
I've never done
Ever since I upgraded all my systems to CentOS 5.1 I have been
getting reports from users about all their windows disappearing. A
little digging revealed that they meant all gnome-terminal windows.
Since there is only one gnome-terminal process by default for all
your open terminal
now do:
i586 text mem=128
when I do i586 text mem=128 it says cant find kernel
so I do linux i586 text mem=128 and I get the same behavior
Loading vmlinuz
Loading initrd
and reboot.
Am I not correctly specifying the kernel yet?
Jerry
On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 14:23 -0400, Alfred von Campe wrote:
Ever since I upgraded all my systems to CentOS 5.1 I have been
getting reports from users about all their windows disappearing. A
little digging revealed that they meant all gnome-terminal windows.
Since there is only one
Jerry Geis wrote:
now do:
i586 text mem=128
when I do i586 text mem=128 it says cant find kernel
so I do linux i586 text mem=128 and I get the same behavior
Loading vmlinuz
Loading initrd
and reboot.
Am I not correctly specifying the kernel yet?
Are you sure this is a CD-1 and
Alfred von Campe wrote:
Ever since I upgraded all my systems to CentOS 5.1 I have been getting
reports from users about all their windows disappearing. A little
digging revealed that they meant all gnome-terminal windows. Since
there is only one gnome-terminal process by default for all your
Jerry Geis wrote:
/
// now do:
//
// i586 text mem=128
//
//
// when I do i586 text mem=128 it says cant find kernel
// so I do linux i586 text mem=128 and I get the same behavior
// Loading vmlinuz
// Loading initrd
// and reboot.
//
// Am I not correctly specifying the kernel yet?
MHR wrote:
I'm trying to build GNOME (to run a more recent version than 2.16.* on
CentOS 5.1) and I keep running into a lot of rather strange problems.
I'm wondering if this might have something to do with my hybrid 64 and
32 bit general environment, so I want to try a pure 64-bit chroot.
I've
I expect that you will see net.ipv4.ip_forward = 1
Please confirm.
Barry
You were right, thanks for the info.
jlc
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Thu, 29 May 2008, Johnny Hughes wrote:
This is already solved on another thread ... but for closure on this one,
there is a known bug here with that kernel and ipsec:
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2853
that bug entry does say to use the upstream bug for info about a
workaround, but
Jerry Geis wrote:
Jerry Geis wrote:
/
// now do:
//
// i586 text mem=128
//
// // when I do i586 text mem=128 it says cant find kernel
// so I do linux i586 text mem=128 and I get the same behavior
// Loading vmlinuz
// Loading initrd
// and reboot.
// // Am I not correctly specifying
On May 29, 2008, at 14:48, Johnny Hughes wrote:
How did you upgrade?
Fresh install via kickstart. I reformatted the root and /boot
partitions, but left one user partition untouched.
Is it possible that you have older (possibly orphaned) binaries
still installed from the upgrade
on 5-29-2008 11:52 AM Jerry Geis spake the following:
Jerry Geis wrote:
/
// now do:
//
// i586 text mem=128
//
// // when I do i586 text mem=128 it says cant find kernel
// so I do linux i586 text mem=128 and I get the same behavior
// Loading vmlinuz
// Loading initrd
// and reboot.
Joe Pruett wrote:
On Thu, 29 May 2008, Johnny Hughes wrote:
This is already solved on another thread ... but for closure on this
one, there is a known bug here with that kernel and ipsec:
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2853
that bug entry does say to use the upstream bug for info about
on 5-29-2008 12:42 PM Ned Slider spake the following:
Joe Pruett wrote:
On Thu, 29 May 2008, Johnny Hughes wrote:
This is already solved on another thread ... but for closure on this
one, there is a known bug here with that kernel and ipsec:
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2853
that
Scott Silva wrote:
on 5-29-2008 12:42 PM Ned Slider spake the following:
Joe Pruett wrote:
On Thu, 29 May 2008, Johnny Hughes wrote:
This is already solved on another thread ... but for closure on this
one, there is a known bug here with that kernel and ipsec:
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 12:14 PM, Alfred von Campe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fresh install via kickstart. I reformatted the root and /boot partitions,
but left one user partition untouched.
I don't think this is possible since I reformatted the root partition (I
only have /, /boot, and
On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 13:09 +0200, Bernhard Gschaider wrote:
On Tue, 27 May 2008 21:51:07 -0400
WLM == William L Maltby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
WLM I chose not to uninstall the distributed one. I unpackaed the
WLM 3.0rc1 tarball in the $HOME of a user and run it from there.
Thanks Tru and Johnny, one more question. Can I just use the
centos5-testing repo, ie, yum enablerepoxxx install kernel-vm? I ask
because I tried and while it worked it loaded an older kernel. Should I
just go to tru's directory and install the RPM directly? Also, ok more than
one question,
Hi,
I configured delay pools on squid. I get the following from squidclient:
Delay pools configured: 2
Pool: 1
Class: 1
Aggregate:
Disabled.
Pool: 2
Class: 1
Aggregate:
Max: 187500
Restore: 187500
Current:
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 3:14 PM, Alfred von Campe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
write(2, The program \'gnome-terminal\' rec..., 592) = 592
This looks interesting, but unfortunately you cut the message too
short to know what it was saying... You might find it in
/var/log/Xorg.0.log, but I wouldn't
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 8:58 PM, Filipe Brandenburger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 3:14 PM, Alfred von Campe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
write(2, The program \'gnome-terminal\' rec..., 592) = 592
This looks interesting, but unfortunately you cut the message too
short to know
Mag Gam wrote:
Hello:
I am planning to implement GFS for my university as a summer project. I
have 10 servers each with SAN disks attached. I will be reading and
writing many files for professor's research projects. Each file can be
anywhere from 1k to 120GB (fluid dynamic research images).
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
We have kernel support for IPv6 in Centos, but not stateful firewall
support.
That requires at least the 2.6.20 kernel, which means Fedora Core 6 or
some other Linux distro.
None of the various free Linux firewalls have IPv6 support. Supposedly
FWBuilder can manage
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 11:43 PM, Christopher Chan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
We have kernel support for IPv6 in Centos, but not stateful firewall
support.
That requires at least the 2.6.20 kernel, which means Fedora Core 6 or
some other Linux distro.
None of the
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 10:53 PM, Matt Shields [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 11:43 PM, Christopher Chan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
We have kernel support for IPv6 in Centos, but not stateful firewall
support.
That requires at least the 2.6.20
Matt Shields wrote:
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 11:43 PM, Christopher Chan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
We have kernel support for IPv6 in Centos, but not stateful firewall
support.
Not sure about FC6, but in both CentOS 4 5 there is an ip6tables. I
haven't used it, but
On Tuesday 27 May 2008 20:19, MHR wrote:
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 5:02 PM, Robert Spangler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can I use one out of the Fedora's repos? If so, which repo?
You can just pull down the latest version from mozilla.org - they're
pretty good about compatibility. I'd
86 matches
Mail list logo
