On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 11:18 AM, Ralph Angenendtra+cen...@br-online.de wrote:
Akemi Yagi wrote:
If the planet.c.o. is meant for the contributors and not limited to
the developers, then the description on www.centos.org would have to
be corrected and Dag should stay on.
What do you think ??
Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 11:18 AM, Ralph Angenendtra+cen...@br-online.de
wrote:
Akemi Yagi wrote:
If the planet.c.o. is meant for the contributors and not limited to
the developers, then the description on www.centos.org would have to
be corrected and Dag should stay on.
John Greiman wrote:
My wiki userid is: JohnGreiman.
http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/WorkingLiveEnvironment
Go ahead.
Ralph
pgptLiDcbAVuv.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 09:19 +0200, Fabian Arrotin wrote:
Coert Waagmeester wrote:
Hello all fellow CentOS users!
I have a working xen setup with 3 paravirt domUs and one Windblows 2003
fully virt domU.
There are to virtual networks.
As far as I can tell in the paravirt
On 06/29/2009 07:59 AM, Coert Waagmeester wrote:
That's not on the dom0 side, but directly in the w2k3 domU .. : you'll
get *bad* performances (at IO and network level) if the xenpv drivers
for Windows aren't installed .. Unfortunately you will not be able to
find them for CentOS. (While
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 10:27 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 06/29/2009 07:59 AM, Coert Waagmeester wrote:
That's not on the dom0 side, but directly in the w2k3 domU .. : you'll
get *bad* performances (at IO and network level) if the xenpv drivers
for Windows aren't installed ..
On 06/29/2009 10:30 AM, Coert Waagmeester wrote:
I will definitely look at such an option, but I do not want to go custom
with my CentOS implementation, and I am only going to use the windows
2k3 domU as domain controller and print server, so if it does not
negatively impact speed of other PV
- Coert Waagmeester lgro...@waagmeester.co.za wrote:
But I am definitely keeping a lookout for when xenpv comes out for
CentOS
You need the Windows side:
http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenWindowsGplPv
--
Christopher G. Stach II
___
I'm elevating myself from noob to noob with scars. I'm not one to
ask a lot of questions if I have time to find out on my own.
I now know at least a half dozen ways to hose a solid CentOS Xen
install. That's a good thing, I learn from mistakes. Like forgetting to
actually completely configure
Just a quick saying to encourage you: wisdom is knowledge learned
through mistakes. Building things is good, but breaking things let's
you learn how to build better things.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 29, 2009, at 2:12 PM, Ben Montanelli montane...@rivint.com
wrote:
I'm elevating myself
I sure wish that was true in my relationships.
Geoffrey J Gowey wrote:
Just a quick saying to encourage you: wisdom is knowledge learned
through mistakes. Building things is good, but breaking things let's
you learn how to build better things.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 29, 2009, at
HOla a todos los listeros tengo estos problemas y quisiera compartirlos
con usteds a ver que creen al respecto...
pues les cuento instale centOS en el server del trabajo, pero tengo varios
problemas.
1-muy importante es una raya como distorciona en la pantalla que sale en
medio de la
Rolando soy nuevo en la lista pero creo que si nos ponemos podemos
solucionarlo.
Revisaste el squid.conf?
Que acls tenes cargados?
que redes tenes creadas? ej lan src 10.10.10.10
Slds y lo seguimos viendo
Christian Cedeira
El 29 de junio de 2009 13:53, Rolando Arteaga
how to change sequence back?
Rather than chase that never ending loop, maybe now is the time
to look into an fstab populated by UUID.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 6:36 AM, Sagar Koiralasagar.koir...@gmail.com wrote:
partition, I created 3 logical partitions 33% each. It went numbering
sdb1, sdb5, sdb6 and sdb7. Where's the hell 2,3 and 4? Anyways, I've
partitions 1 through 4 are dedicated to primary/extended partitions,
logicals
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 8:29 PM, fmb fmbfee...@googlemail.com wrote:
Is the IP Virtual Server available by default in the stock
2.6.18-128.1.14.el5? Or shall I compile my own kernel? I did check
config-2.6.18-128.1.14.el5 yet I am not that sure! :)
It is enabled in the distro kernel:
#
# IP:
If your trying to make CentOS/Fedora boxes to get hostname remember you need
to have localhost.localdomain in /etc/sysconfig/network.
HOSTNAME=localhost.localdomain
see around line 252-261
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/network-functions
need_hostname ()
{
CHECK_HOSTNAME=`hostname`
if [
Hi guys ... I have a problem ...
here is my settup
luci
xen0 xen1
[r...@xen1 ~]# clustat
Cluster Status for XEN_Cluster @ Mon Jun 29 03:31:23 2009
Member Status: Quorate
Member Name ID Status
--
Thanks.
I didn't put / and /boot in the Volume Group. Is it ok?
Yaovi
--- En date de : Dim 28.6.09, David Goldsmith dgoldsm...@sans.org a écrit :
De: David Goldsmith dgoldsm...@sans.org
Objet: Re: [CentOS] Partitionning for future.
À: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Date: Dimanche 28 Juin
Rob Townley a écrit :
# i do NOT have any kind of use-host-decl-names on; entry. Do you use
dnsmasq or dhcpd?
I'm using DHCPD. I took two spare machines this morning and played
around with them to make some tests. Here's what I got.
a) Server-side, static IP configuration of course, here's
Niki Kovacs a écrit :
If I take a look at /var/lib/dhclient/dhclient-eth0.leases (on the
client), here's a summary of the lease:
lease {
interface eth0;
fixed-address 192.168.1.2;
option subnet-mask 255.255.255.0;
option routers 192.168.1.254;
option dhcp-lease-time
Hi All,
I am having issue when trying to build a custom kernel in CentOS 4.4.
Current Kernel Version is 2.6.9-42.ELsmp and the server is HP Proliant DL380
G3. I downloaded the source rpm and then installed it. Gave the command,
rpmbuild -bp --target=i686 /usr/src/redhat/SPECS/kernel-2.6.spec. But
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 06:56:01PM +0200, przemol...@poczta.fm wrote:
Hello,
one of our developers is developing his Web applications (PHP-based+MySql) on
64-bit Fedora. He would like to use the same, 64-bit environment on CentOS. I
am not against 64-bits (we use it for many, many years
Niki Kovacs wrote:
Niki Kovacs a écrit :
If I take a look at /var/lib/dhclient/dhclient-eth0.leases (on the
client), here's a summary of the lease:
lease {
interface eth0;
fixed-address 192.168.1.2;
option subnet-mask 255.255.255.0;
option routers 192.168.1.254;
option
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Scott Silva
Sent: Friday, June 26, 2009 7:50 PM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Web photo gallery options [Solved]
Anyway, I installed Gallery2 yesterday evening and finished up
Lanny Marcus a écrit :
Wondering if there is anything else I can use on Linux that
is easier on a FrontPage user.
Recommendations?
People often think this is a joke, but by far the easiest way to build a
website is:
a) learn proper XHTML and CSS. There's tutorials galore on the internet.
Kurian Thayil wrote:
Hi All,
I am having issue when trying to build a custom kernel in CentOS 4.4.
Current Kernel Version is 2.6.9-42.ELsmp and the server is HP Proliant DL380
G3. I downloaded the source rpm and then installed it. Gave the command,
rpmbuild -bp --target=i686
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 12:06 AM, Lanny Marcuslmmailingli...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 5:06 PM, Rob Townleyrob.town...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Ned Slidern...@unixmail.co.uk wrote:
Lanny Marcus wrote:
I have KomPozer installed, but after using M$
Hi Ned,
The package cpp was already installed.
[r...@astind02 customKernelcompile]# rpm -qa |grep cpp
cpp-3.4.6-3
[r...@astind02 customKernelcompile]# rpm -qa |grep gcc
gcc-c++-3.4.6-3
libgcc-3.4.6-3
gcc-3.4.6-3
Any hint on this??
Regards,
Kurian Thayil.
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 3:08 PM, Ned
Hi
Do you have the correct kernel source installed?
Regards
Per
E-mail: p...@norhex.com [1]
http://www.linkedin.com/in/perqvindesland [2]
--- Original message follows ---
SUBJECT: Re: [CentOS] Building Custom Kernel - CentOS 4.4
FROM: Kurian Thayil
TO: CentOS mailing list
DATE: 29-06-2009 12:05
Kurian Thayil wrote:
Hi Ned,
The package cpp was already installed.
[r...@astind02 customKernelcompile]# rpm -qa |grep cpp
cpp-3.4.6-3
[r...@astind02 customKernelcompile]# rpm -qa |grep gcc
gcc-c++-3.4.6-3
libgcc-3.4.6-3
gcc-3.4.6-3
Any hint on this??
hmm, not sure. Perhaps you
On 06/27/2009 09:21 PM, Mag Gam wrote:
sane and simple security management for linux systems:
1. only open ports in iptables which are being used, if possible with
source address or source network.
2. use hosts.allow/deny rules for services if applicable, this adds
another layer of security.
3.
- przemol...@poczta.fm wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 06:56:01PM +0200, przemol...@poczta.fm wrote:
Hello,
one of our developers is developing his Web applications
(PHP-based+MySql) on 64-bit Fedora. He would like to use the same,
64-bit environment on CentOS. I am not against
On 06/29/2009 04:00 PM, Sander wrote:
sorry for the typos: here are the correct sites for hardening linux
http://bastille-linux.sourceforge.net
http://cisecurity.org center for internet security
good luck hardening your servers
WE have a centos 5.3 install, and our server is keep
Sorin Srbu wrote:
Hi all,
I'm looking for a web photo gallery for my personal web server at home. Till
now I've done the galleries manually from Adobe Photoshop Elements, but I
feel that is a dead end, kinda', besides the fact that the galleries created
are rather static. I'd like an easier
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 04:00, Niki Kovacscont...@kikinovak.net wrote:
host raymonde {
hardware ethernet 00:20:ed:b8:e8:ec;
fixed-address 192.168.1.2;
option host-name raymonde;
}
[...]
lease {
option host-name raymonde;
option domain-name local;
}
Here's what 'hostname'
Hi Karanbir,
Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org wrote:
On 06/26/2009 09:46 AM, Ryo Tsuruta wrote:
I'm pleased to announce that the new dm-ioband RPM package (v1.12.0)
has been released at:
http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/ioband/wiki/dm-ioband
dm-ioband provides disk bandwidth
You will still be limited to a single primary server with DRBD.
Here is a line from their site:
DRBD's primary-primary mode with a shared disk file system (GFS, OCFS2).
These systems are very sensitive to failures of the replication network.
Currently we cannot generally recommend this for
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 9:00 AM, Sander Snelzander.s...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/27/2009 09:21 PM, Mag Gam wrote:
sane and simple security management for linux systems:
1. only open ports in iptables which are being used, if possible with
source address or source network.
2. use
Rob Townley wrote:
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 9:00 AM, Sander Snelzander.s...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/27/2009 09:21 PM, Mag Gam wrote:
sane and simple security management for linux systems:
1. only open ports in iptables which are being used, if possible with
source address or source network.
From http://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20090629
Right next to the Gentoo stand was a group of young people, proudly
displaying their affiliation with CentOS.
Dag Wieers, the well-known maintainer of a once very popular RPM
repository, greeted me with a big smile: Do you know CentOS
przemol...@poczta.fm wrote:
However, to continune this discussion, could you please explain why did you
switch to 64-bit environment ?
If you have databases and want to use buffer cache bigger then 4GB it is
clear for me. In other words
For myself I did not switch off, I still deploy 32-bit
A quick look at http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=centos
shows that a great majority of the packages are not even
close to being up-to-date, and that is a good thing for
those us of who care more about stability than eyecandy.
That can't be other way. For instance, you can't
I have implemented LDAP on CentOS successfully using Redhat's Directory
Server and the great how-to on the CentOS wiki.
Being new to LDAP, I have a question and maybe one of you guys can point
me in the right direction: I have LDAP implemented on the network for
logins to the workstation pcs.
Is there any reason (besides upstream does it) to compile
php5 with --without-sqlite in CentOS5 ?
Would it conflict with the sqlite that yum needs?
Is there a repo (centosplus, rpmforge...) having a php5 and sqlite
enabled ?
I can only find older mails that seem to imply it does not harm to
Radu-Cristian FOTESCU wrote:
OTOH, Dag is in a funny position: he's the main maintainer of RPMforge,
which has 2 main issues:
(1) It's broken, at least partially. Try install audacious for one.
(2) It's incompatible with EPEL. Try install MPlayer and VLC with EPEL
enabled.
I don't like
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 10:40:49AM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
Radu-Cristian FOTESCU wrote:
OTOH, Dag is in a funny position: he's the main maintainer of RPMforge,
which has 2 main issues:
(1) It's broken, at least partially. Try install audacious for one.
(2) It's incompatible with
Greetings CentOS community!
I connect to a very large number of new machines with a handful of my CentOS
boxen. Whenever I connect to a new host, I *REALLY* would like to *NOT* see the
error message such as this:
The authenticity of host 'w.x.y.z (w.x.y.z)' can't be established.
RSA key
Read this article. it will explain a couple of different ways on how to
do what you're looking to do and the pros and cons of them.
http://www.securityfocus.com/infocus/1806
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Tim Nelson
Tim Nelson wrote:
Is there a way to disable this error/authenticity check globally for a
system? I understand it may not be the best practice in terms of security,
but for an internal trusted host, I have no reservations making this change.
ssh -o StrictHostKeyChecking=no
or add
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 11:57, Tim Nelsontnel...@rockbochs.com wrote:
I connect to a very large number of new machines with a handful of my CentOS
boxen. Whenever I connect to a new host, I *REALLY* would like to *NOT* see
the error message such as this:
The authenticity of host
Hi there.
I have 2 days trying to resolve this issue ...
I have 2 xen servers in cluster ... and I installed Luci on another server
separate from the 2 xen servers.
I created a cluster ... I create a failed over domain
I did migration and live migration from a dom0 to another ...
My
- Filipe Brandenburger filbran...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 11:57, Tim Nelsontnel...@rockbochs.com
wrote:
I connect to a very large number of new machines with a handful of
my CentOS boxen. Whenever I connect to a new host, I *REALLY* would
like to *NOT* see the
Les Mikesell wrote:
Radu-Cristian FOTESCU wrote:
OTOH, Dag is in a funny position: he's the main maintainer of RPMforge,
which has 2 main issues:
(1) It's broken, at least partially. Try install audacious for one.
(2) It's incompatible with EPEL. Try install MPlayer and VLC with EPEL
On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, Les Mikesell wrote:
Radu-Cristian FOTESCU wrote:
OTOH, Dag is in a funny position: he's the main maintainer of RPMforge,
which has 2 main issues:
(1) It's broken, at least partially. Try install audacious for one.
(2) It's incompatible with EPEL. Try install MPlayer and
On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, Radu-Cristian FOTESCU wrote:
A quick look at http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=centos
shows that a great majority of the packages are not even
close to being up-to-date, and that is a good thing for
those us of who care more about stability than eyecandy.
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 03:50, Yaovi Atohounyaov...@yahoo.fr wrote:
I didn't put / and /boot in the Volume Group. Is it ok?
Yes if you just want to grow /var it's OK. If you want to grow / or
/boot though, it will be a problem...
If you still haven't started installing the machine, you might
Dag Wieers wrote:
Now, I always thought that RPMforge wouldn't have the resources to
start making the repositories compatible, but apparently the Fedora
projecy is simply not even interested in doing this.
Dag, we had a lengthy thread on the rpmforge list not long ago to debunk
this, and I
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Mag Gammagaw...@gmail.com wrote:
WE have a centos 5.3 install, and our server is keep getting hacked.
We see load averages of 500+ and see people from all over the world
logging into our server (used last).
Is there a good place to start to avoid these kinds
not to be rude but back to the core of the original question:
is is safe to assume that future releases of Centos will remain a
built from publicly available open source SRPMS provided by a prominent North
American Enterprise Linux vendor. CentOS conforms fully with the upstream
vendors
While I don't want to just add noise to this thread, I think that there
might be some miscommunication and/or misunderstanding involved here. I
also want to express my appreciation to Dag and the folks who maintain
the RPMforge repo, as I find it quite useful.
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 20:34 +0200,
Dag Wieers wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, Radu-Cristian FOTESCU wrote:
A quick look at http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=centos
shows that a great majority of the packages are not even
close to being up-to-date, and that is a good thing for
those us of who care more about
(1) I expect now patches from you to make a workable
audacious based on our audacious package. Apparently
you have the interest and the time to do it ?
RF's audacious has unmet dependencies. It's as simple as that.
It lacks audacious-plugins.
(2) No, they are not compatible, we know. Share
On Jun 29, 2009, at 4:42 PM, Radu-Cristian FOTESCU wrote:
I know, and I understand that you are now vexed, but, like I said:
instead of 8,000 packages in RF, better have 400 rock-solid ones?
i look to rpmforge for a wide variety of packages, none of which have
anything to do with mplayer,
On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, Radu-Cristian FOTESCU wrote:
(1) I expect now patches from you to make a workable
audacious based on our audacious package. Apparently
you have the interest and the time to do it ?
RF's audacious has unmet dependencies. It's as simple as that.
It lacks
On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, Rex Dieter wrote:
Dag Wieers wrote:
Now, I always thought that RPMforge wouldn't have the resources to
start making the repositories compatible, but apparently the Fedora
projecy is simply not even interested in doing this.
Dag, we had a lengthy thread on the rpmforge
Dag Wieers wrote:
I don't see any effort from the Fedora side to do anything about this.
True, no one goes out of their way to proactively test things, but that same
argument goes both ways.
What I'm more interested in is concrete examples of problems not being
addressed. Are there any?
Yaovi,
Make sure that you never put /boot on LVM because your machine will not
boot.
Matt
--
Mathew S. McCarrell
Clarkson University '10
mccar...@gmail.com
mccar...@clarkson.edu
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 3:50 AM, Yaovi Atohoun yaov...@yahoo.fr wrote:
Thanks.
I didn't put / and /boot in the
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 03:57:09PM -0700, Radu-Cristian FOTESCU wrote:
I am sorry to decline your offer: I don't need access to a
8,000-package repo, for later I could be accused of some
breakage I might have not caused. Unless RF starts from zero
(that is, by tossing whatever does not
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 4:18 AM, Niki Kovacscont...@kikinovak.net wrote:
Lanny Marcus a écrit :
Wondering if there is anything else I can use on Linux that
is easier on a FrontPage user.
Recommendations?
People often think this is a joke, but by far the easiest way to build a
website is:
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 4:42 AM, luc...@lastdot.orgluc...@lastdot.org wrote:
snip
Lanny Marcus wrote:
I have KomPozer installed, but after using M$ FrontPage for years,
KomPozer looks like it is going to have a learning curve and I want to
get away from FrontPage and Windows. I know Mark
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 10:20 AM, Radu-Cristian
FOTESCUberanger...@yahoo.ca wrote:
A quick look at http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=centos
shows that a great majority of the packages are not even
close to being up-to-date, and that is a good thing for
those us of who care more
led to the great compiler we have today. The same
would hold for any large project (the kernel, firefox, etc.)
And... are you happy with the quality of the huge $h1t which
is Firefox? Because I am not.
As for the Linux kernel, they pushed in all kind of crap.
Back in 1996, I was running
thanx. i missed that
From: Neil Aggarwal n...@jammconsulting.com
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 10:36:37 PM
Subject: Re: [CentOS] 2 servers cluster
You will still
be limited to a single primary server with DRBD.
Here is a line from
their site:
DRBD's
same here. i really must thank dag wiers and gang for all the good work. But If
epel and rpmforge can work together , that's great.
- Original Message
From: Ron Loftin relof...@twcny.rr.com
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 3:13:33 AM
Subject:
beranger...@yahoo.com... , u have a problem with dag...and now it looks like u
have a problem with linus torvalds himself u talk abt the need for
cooperation,etc but you apparently dont get that 'you have to give respect
to get respect' 'give cooperation to get cooperation'
relax
76 matches
Mail list logo
