Am 16.01.11 13:30, schrieb Jasper Siepkes:
If anyone is interested I could put up a wiki page outlining the steps
to create RPM's with JPackage ?
It's all about choice (isn't _23 the current one, though?). So if you
want to write something up which can also be put on that page, feel free
-
Ralph Angenendt wrote on 01/15/2011 03:39 PM:
...
To me the article looks good, if you can incorporate it into the current
wiki article (and not just replace that).
I beg to differ. The current Wiki article contains a lot of confusing
and obsolete information, and in trying to cover a
Manuel Wolfshant wrote on 01/15/2011 07:59 PM:
I took advantage of you invitation to complete/correct the page and
fixed a minor typo + added a reference to the xenblk module
Thanks. Instructions on adding other modules would be good to add too,
when someone gets a Round Tuit.
Phil
Jasper Siepkes wrote on 01/16/2011 07:30 AM:
...
If anyone is interested I could put up a wiki page outlining the steps
to create RPM's with JPackage ?
Very much so, particularly your spec mods and details on your
alternatives configuration, which seems to cover more bases than I have
done in
On 01/16/2011 04:03 PM, Phil Schaffner wrote:
Ralph Angenendt wrote on 01/15/2011 03:39 PM:
...
To me the article looks good, if you can incorporate it into the current
wiki article (and not just replace that).
I beg to differ. The current Wiki article contains a lot of confusing
and
Am 16.01.11 15:15, schrieb Manuel Wolfshant:
On 01/16/2011 04:03 PM, Phil Schaffner wrote:
If this approach is accepted I would be glad to help draft the cover
page, and to help with polishing sub-pages; having over the years dealt
with JDK via Sun(Oracle) RPMs, building JDK via the Jpackage
Am 16.01.11 15:15, schrieb Manuel Wolfshant:
On 01/16/2011 04:03 PM, Phil Schaffner wrote:
Obsolete pages and information could either
be pruned or preserved in a Historical section.
neah. the old page should be either updated or deleted/replaced. it's
close to useless as it is now.
I'm
I am facing problems assigning the owner and group to an ext3
filesystem being mounted from an external storage. I created a mount
point /vol and changed its owner and group to alpha and beta
respectively (as required). The ext3 filesystem (LV from the external
storage) was then mounted on /vol
Manish Kathuria writes:
I am facing problems assigning the owner and group to an ext3
filesystem being mounted from an external storage. I created a mount
point /vol and changed its owner and group to alpha and beta
respectively (as required). The ext3 filesystem (LV from the external
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 5:08 AM, Jason S-M slackmoehrle.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I am wondering what tools are available in CentOS 5.5 that would allow me to
measure incoming and outgoing network speeds? My new website seems to be
getting a lot more traffic that I had anticipated off
At Sun, 16 Jan 2011 14:20:40 +0530 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
I am facing problems assigning the owner and group to an ext3
filesystem being mounted from an external storage. I created a mount
point /vol and changed its owner and group to alpha and beta
respectively (as
Then, is there any other way to mount external hard disk as ntfs in read
write mode?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
hello,
I am absolutely new, means from non-IT sector but have attraction (developed
recently) towards linux and have chosen the centos distro for the
installation as an OS in my home PC for personal use. I went to the page:
http://isoredirect.centos.org/centos/5/isos/i386/
But don't understand
On Sun, 16 Jan 2011, Cameron Kerr wrote:
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
From: Cameron Kerr came...@humbledown.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Network bandwidth tools.
It all depends on your requirements:
- what sort of questions would you like your solution to be able to answer?
On 13 January 2011 01:27, Gregory P. Ennis po...@pomec.net wrote:
Dear List,
I need to be able to pull off attachments from e-mails on the fly and
then demime them and print them. I have been studying MIME::Tools but
was hoping someone could point me to a script example of something I
could
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org
[mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Parshwa Murdia
Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2011 9:52
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS] Troubles for an non-IT beginner
hello,
I am absolutely new, means from non-IT sector
On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 15:51 +0100, Parshwa Murdia wrote:
hello,
I am absolutely new, means from non-IT sector but have attraction
(developed recently) towards linux and have chosen the centos distro
for the installation as an OS in my home PC for personal use. I went
to the page:
At Sun, 16 Jan 2011 10:19:54 -0500 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org
[mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Parshwa Murdia
Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2011 9:52
To: centos@centos.org
Subject:
On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 15:16 +, Keith Roberts wrote:
I'm willing to build it for Centos 5.5 if that helps :)
Keith
Looks like another builder here? Makes 3 now?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 10:55 -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
You can ignore md5 for now - they are just for verifying that the file
you've downloaded has not been modified.
You should not tell him to ignore it but tell him how to use it and what
it is for.
md5sum my.iso Validate the ISO
Hi All,
I am wondering what tools are available in CentOS 5.5 that would allow me to
measure incoming and outgoing network speeds? My new website seems to be
getting a lot more traffic that I had anticipated off the bat and I would
like to measure resource usage to ensure it is keeping
Also run memtest86 on them overnight (getting at least one complete iteration).
That utility is available by booting the installation CD/DVD.
Devin
--
Did you sleep well? No, I made a couple of mistakes.
- Stephen Wright
Lisandro Grullon lgrul...@citytech.cuny.edu wrote:
What do you personally use to backup your boxes, it would be great to
know since I am looking for an alternative.
Bacula is a solid open source network backup product, has commercial
support for those who need it, has a feature set that is
If its two servers doing the same, then I guess it's not likely they both
have the same hardware problem. The thing is, that's not something centos is
going to do on its own, so it's some program that's been added, or some
common bios setting that's wrong.
Do they connect to a UPS with a
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Robert Heller hel...@deepsoft.com wrote:
i386 is for older technology PCs. The x86_64 is for newer PCs
How can I know that I have to use i386 or x86_64, my machine is not very new
though.
The x86_64 release takes two DVDs, but the second DVD just has
How can I know that I have to use i386 or x86_64, my machine is not very
new though
Do some research on your computer - who makes it, what model number, what
cpu, how much ram?
i386 is 32bit, x86_64 is 64 bit. If you have 4 gigs of ram or more, you'll
likely want the 64bit.
On 01/16/2011 12:31 PM, Parshwa Murdia wrote:
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Robert Heller hel...@deepsoft.com
mailto:hel...@deepsoft.com wrote:
i386 is for older technology PCs. The x86_64 is for newer PCs
How can I know that I have to use i386 or x86_64, my machine is not very
On 1/16/2011 9:24 AM, compdoc wrote:
I've seen one memtest iteration pass, but 2 or 3 were needed before a
failure showed up. That's not usually the case, though...
I have a server right now which passed three memtest iterations but
throws intermittent errors on one DIMM when it gets warm
At Sun, 16 Jan 2011 18:31:04 +0100 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Robert Heller hel...@deepsoft.com wrote:
i386 is for older technology PCs. The x86_64 is for newer PCs
How can I know that I have to use i386 or x86_64, my machine is
On 01/16/11 6:48 AM, Ritika Garg wrote:
Then, is there any other way to mount external hard disk as ntfs in
read write mode?
I would use a network for this. Leave the NTFS volume on a Windows
system where it belongs and read/write it across a LAN.
On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 10:22 -0700, Devin Reade wrote:
Lisandro Grullon lgrul...@citytech.cuny.edu wrote:
What do you personally use to backup your boxes, it would be great to
know since I am looking for an alternative.
Bacula is a solid open source network backup product, has commercial
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 6:45 PM, Robert Heller hel...@deepsoft.com wrote:
How can I know that I have to use i386 or x86_64, my machine is not very
new
though.
How old is it?
It is some two years old and I guess after seeing the things that it could
be 32 bit which is in requirement.
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 6:40 PM, Digimer li...@alteeve.com wrote:
If your computer has a 64-bit CPU then you can use x86_64. This makes it
easier to access memory above 3GB, and many new applications are now
available in 64-bit. If your CPU is older, it may only support 32-bit.
In this case,
On 01/16/11 10:40 AM, Parshwa Murdia wrote:
CentOS-5.5-i386-LiveCD-Release2.iso
http://ftp.iitm.ac.in/centos/5.5/isos/i386/CentOS-5.5-i386-LiveCD-Release2.iso
is having complete OS 5.5 for 32 bit, but where could be obtained the
torrent link for this particular file?
the LiveCD does not
Barry Brimer wrote:
I am wondering what tools are available
in CentOS 5.5 that would allow me to measure incoming and
outgoing network speeds? My new website seems to be getting a
lot more traffic that I had anticipated off the bat and I would
like to measure resource usage to ensure it
At Sun, 16 Jan 2011 19:40:10 +0100 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 6:45 PM, Robert Heller hel...@deepsoft.com wrote:
How can I know that I have to use i386 or x86_64, my machine is not very
new
though.
How old is it?
It is some two
At Sun, 16 Jan 2011 19:43:55 +0100 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 6:40 PM, Digimer li...@alteeve.com wrote:
If your computer has a 64-bit CPU then you can use x86_64. This makes it
easier to access memory above 3GB, and many new applications are
On 01/16/2011 01:43 PM, Parshwa Murdia wrote:
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 6:40 PM, Digimer li...@alteeve.com
mailto:li...@alteeve.com wrote:
If your computer has a 64-bit CPU then you can use x86_64. This makes it
easier to access memory above 3GB, and many new applications are now
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 8:32 PM, Digimer li...@alteeve.com wrote:
I'd have to search through the CentOS mirror list to find it. Given the
geographic spread of the mirrors though, you would be best served to
search yourself for one near you.
Ok.
By all means, try CentOS, but if you run
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 8:03 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
the LiveCD does not have the installer, its more of a demo.
the 7 CDs are the complete system, but you can install with just the
first one by choosing the minimal packages, and then use yum to install
other components.
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 8:03 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
the LiveCD does not have the installer, its more of a demo.
But then what's the utility of that live CD?
--
Regards,
Parshwa Murdia
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
2011/1/16 cpol...@surewest.net:
Barry Brimer wrote:
At the risk of pissing off the list for such a long
post
Personally, I never get pissed off due to long mails, but I do get
pissed off when people keeps changing the subject (and/or use broken
mail clients)...like:
Network bandwidth tools
On 01/16/2011 02:35 PM, Parshwa Murdia wrote:
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 8:32 PM, Digimer li...@alteeve.com
mailto:li...@alteeve.com wrote:
I'd have to search through the CentOS mirror list to find it. Given the
geographic spread of the mirrors though, you would be best served to
On 17/01/2011, at 7:43 AM, Parshwa Murdia wrote:
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 6:40 PM, Digimer li...@alteeve.com wrote:
If you are completely new to Linux, may I suggest you start with Fedora
or Ubuntu? CentOS is a wonderful distrobution, but it is aimed at
somewhat more advanced used. It is
On 17/01/2011, at 8:38 AM, Parshwa Murdia wrote:
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 8:03 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
the LiveCD does not have the installer, its more of a demo.
But then what's the utility of that live CD?
It doesn't need to be installed onto the hard-disk, so it
On Sun, 16 Jan 2011, compdoc wrote:
To: 'CentOS mailing list' centos@centos.org
From: compdoc comp...@hotrodpc.com
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Server reboots unexpectebly.
If its two servers doing the same, then I guess it's not likely they both
have the same hardware problem. The thing is,
On 1/16/11 1:32 PM, Digimer wrote:
As for distro stability, it is true that Fedora/Ubuntu is not *as*
stable as CentOS, but I use Fedora for my daily use laptop (I'm a
sysadmin/programmer) and I've never had a major issue. By all means, try
CentOS, but if you run into problems, please give
On Sun, 16 Jan 2011, JohnS wrote:
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
From: JohnS jse...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Network bandwidth tools. || RPM Builder
On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 15:16 +, Keith Roberts wrote:
I'm willing to build it for Centos 5.5 if that helps :)
Keith
At Sun, 16 Jan 2011 20:37:29 +0100 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 8:03 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
the LiveCD does not have the installer, its more of a demo.
the 7 CDs are the complete system, but you can install with just the
At Sun, 16 Jan 2011 14:47:33 -0500 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
On 01/16/2011 02:35 PM, Parshwa Murdia wrote:
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 8:32 PM, Digimer li...@alteeve.com
mailto:li...@alteeve.com wrote:
I'd have to search through the CentOS mirror list to find it.
At Sun, 16 Jan 2011 20:38:03 +0100 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 8:03 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
the LiveCD does not have the installer, its more of a demo.
But then what's the utility of that live CD?
It is good for:
1)
Parshwa Murdia wrote:
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 8:03 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com
mailto:pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
the LiveCD does not have the installer, its more of a demo.
But then what's the utility of that live CD?
It's meant to be used to test if the distro likes your
On 1/16/11 12:43 PM, Parshwa Murdia wrote:
Fedora and Ubuntu doesn't have stability and for all the family members, once
they are familiar with, they should work at that but Fedora expires soon
(searched at net), so for stability and all factors, Cent OS would be good, i
Guess so! It could be
On 01/16/2011 03:21 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 1/16/11 12:43 PM, Parshwa Murdia wrote:
Fedora and Ubuntu doesn't have stability and for all the family members, once
they are familiar with, they should work at that but Fedora expires soon
(searched at net), so for stability and all factors,
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 8:47 PM, Digimer li...@alteeve.com wrote:
The kernel is, if I recall correctly, 2.6.18 that has only been patched
to fix bugs and security features. The modern kernel is 2.6.37, and a
*lot* of hardware has come along in the years in between. For example,
it's unlikely
Hi list.
I have rebuilt tcptrack now.
You can get it from here:
http://www.karsites.net/centos/downloads/5.5/tcptrack-1.3.0-1.el5.i386.rpm
It's not signed, so to install it with yum as root user, do:
# yum localinstall --nogpgcheck tcptrack-1.3.0-1.el5.i386.rpm
in the directory you d/l it
They are not on a ups at the moment since these boxes are being test. Do u
think this could be a power issue?
--Original Message--
From: compdoc
Sender: centos-boun...@centos.org
To: 'CentOS mailing list'
ReplyTo: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Server reboots unexpectebly.
This is interesting...I wonder if my box is having and overheating issue.
Sent on the Sprint® Now Network from my BlackBerry®
-Original Message-
From: Jerry Franz jfr...@freerun.com
Sender: centos-boun...@centos.org
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 09:42:46
To: CentOS mailing listcentos@centos.org
I will look into this one when I return to work...thank u for the tip. Can it
also be a heading issue.
--Original Message--
From: Keith Roberts
Sender: centos-boun...@centos.org
To: CentOS mailing list
ReplyTo: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Server reboots unexpectebly.
Sent:
Lisandro Grullon lgrul...@citytech.cuny.edu wrote:
They are not on a ups at the moment since these boxes are being test. Do u
think this could be a power issue?
Depending on the quality of your power, certainly it can be a factor.
We generally have good power, but it's been years since I've
I've just setup nic bonding on our server (DL585-G7 running Centos 5.5 x86_64)
as detailed on the wiki: http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/BondingInterfaces
and all seems fine but from other howto's I've seen on the web, they're
should be a /proc/net/bond0/info
As far as I can see, I don't
On Sat, 2011-01-08 at 15:19 -0600, Barry Brimer wrote:
I've been to the sane site and looked at the backends. The HP 3210 is
supported by hpio and there is a note that hpio is no longer needed
because the functionality has been rolled int hplip. yum shows hplip is
installed:
hplip.x86_64
Lisandro Grullon wrote:
This is interesting...I wonder if my box is having and overheating issue.
Back in the day, we used h eat gun or even a hair dryer
to heat up a suspect system to induce an incipient
failure to show up.
--
Charles Polisher
___
David McGuffey wrote:
On Sat, 2011-01-08 at 15:19 -0600, Barry Brimer wrote:
RHEL/CentOS have very old packages for HP printer/scanner support,
although there will be a vastly updated version available in 5.6. I just
got a new All-in-One e709a to work across the network with the packages
Afraid not, no /proc/net/bonding either.
This is all I can see:
[root@inbfop03 ~]# find / -name bonding 2/dev/null
/lib/modules/2.6.18-194.32.1.el5/kernel/drivers/net/bonding
/lib/modules/2.6.18-194.el5/kernel/drivers/net/bonding
/usr/src/kernels/2.6.18-194.el5-x86_64/drivers/net/bonding
Greetings,
do updatedb
Please locate the somethingbonding.txt in the installation
go through the procedure
You need to modprobe bonding (with mii settings)
you need to manually create the bond0 files
you need to edit ethx interfaces to enslave them to the bonding master
you need to configure
Sorry, I'm not sure I understand your comments.
I understand what bonding is and how it works and ours is working fine.
Just not sure why I don't have any /proc/net/bond* files
--Russell
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of
67 matches
Mail list logo
