Re: [CentOS] After reboot of web-server accessing website shows "Forbidden", restarting httpd all is fine

On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 06:08:11AM -0800, Mark Milhollan wrote: > It allows (even forces) a "dirty" environment to be provided to the > service (which is seldom wanted or expected), does not ensure that the > current tty cannot be the controlling tty for the service (which > sometimes matters)

Re: [CentOS] After reboot of web-server accessing website shows "Forbidden", restarting httpd all is fine

On Sat, 7 Nov 2015, Fred Smith wrote: >On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 07:23:59PM -0800, Gordon Messmer wrote: >>On 11/06/2015 06:30 PM, Jobst Schmalenbach wrote: >>>What troubles me that a simple restart of the daemon fixes everything but it >>>does not come up on reboot. >> >>Running the service

[CentOS] CentOS6: missing kernel module?

Testing out tipc for cluster development, and running into an immediate snag. tipcutils was found in EPEL but despite having a "compatible" kernel, it doesn't seem to actually work. It's a completely updated system, Intel i5 with 16 GB of RAM, nothing remarkable. Any ideas? [root@backup2

Re: [CentOS] CentOS6: missing kernel module?

On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 1:29 PM, Benjamin Smith wrote: > Testing out tipc for cluster development, and running into an immediate snag. > tipcutils was found in EPEL but despite having a "compatible" kernel, it > doesn't seem to actually work. > > It's a completely updated

Re: [CentOS] Rsync and differential Backups

Ciao Alessandro, On 11/09/2015 05:01 PM, Alessandro Baggi wrote: Hi list, how to perform a differential backup using rsync? On web there is a great confusion about diff backup concept when searched with rsync. Users says diff because it copy only differences. For me differential is backup

Re: [CentOS] Rsync and differential Backups

On Mon, November 9, 2015 7:52 pm, Keith Keller wrote: > On 2015-11-09, John R Pierce wrote: >> >> XFS handles this fine. I have a backuppc storage pool with backups of >> 27 servers going back a year... now, I just have 30 days of >> incrementals, and 12 months of fulls, >

Re: [CentOS] Rsync and differential Backups

On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 9:31 PM, Alessandro Baggi wrote: > Hi list, > how to perform a differential backup using rsync? > > On web there is a great confusion about diff backup concept when searched > with rsync. > > Users says diff because it copy only differences. For

Re: [CentOS] Rsync and differential Backups

On 2015-11-10, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > I'm fully with you on -o inode64, but I would think it is not inode number > that becomes large with extensive use of hard links, but the space used by > directory data, thus requiring to relocate these once they exceed some >

Re: [CentOS] Rsync and differential Backups

On 11/09/2015 09:59 AM, John R Pierce wrote: On 11/9/2015 9:50 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote: I don't see the distinction you're making. a incremental backup copies everything since the last incremental a differential copies everything since the last full. I guess that makes sense, but in backup

Re: [CentOS] centos 6 and super jumbo frames

On 11/09/2015 12:36 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: On 11/09/2015 08:34 AM, Steve Clark wrote: Has anyone using CentOS 6 been able to successfully set an mtu larger than 9710 on an interface. Maximum frame size varies from implementation to implementation:

Re: [CentOS] Rsync and differential Backups

Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 11/09/2015 09:59 AM, John R Pierce wrote: >> On 11/9/2015 9:50 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote: >>> I don't see the distinction you're making. >> >> a incremental backup copies everything since the last incremental >> a differential copies everything since the last full. > > I

Re: [CentOS] CentOS7 and "ip link alias"

On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 7:52 AM, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Nov 2, 2015, at 2:40 PM, Mike - st257 wrote: > > But when I try to remove it, I'm either trying to do something _actually_ > > not supported or I don't have the proper syntax to accomplish

Re: [CentOS] After reboot of web-server accessing website shows "Forbidden", restarting httpd all is fine

On 11/06/2015 06:30 PM, Jobst Schmalenbach wrote: Putting selinux into permissive mode starts the server right from boot. Looking at all the logs I cannot see anything. Which logs? You should see AVC denies logged in /var/log/audit/audit.log, unless you've disabled audit logging. The AVCs

Re: [CentOS] Rsync and differential Backups

On 11/9/2015 9:50 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote: I don't see the distinction you're making. a incremental backup copies everything since the last incremental a differential copies everything since the last full. rsync is NOT a backup system, its just a incremental file copy with the

[CentOS-virt] Updated packages for XSA-156 to be built starting at 12:01am UTC

As you may have noticed, XSA-156 is due to be released publicly at 12:01am tomorrow (10 November). I've prepped packages, and before I leave today will set a script to send them to the CBS at 12:01 exactly. Packages should end up in virt6-xen-44-candidate within probably half an hour after that.

Re: [CentOS] centos 6 and super jumbo frames

On 11/09/2015 08:34 AM, Steve Clark wrote: Has anyone using CentOS 6 been able to successfully set an mtu larger than 9710 on an interface. Maximum frame size varies from implementation to implementation: http://pages.uoregon.edu/joe/jumbo-clean-gear.html It's also worth noting that that

Re: [CentOS] Rsync and differential Backups

On 11/09/2015 08:01 AM, Alessandro Baggi wrote: how to perform a differential backup using rsync? rsync backups are always incremental against the most recent backup (assuming you're copying to the same location). Users says diff because it copy only differences. For me differential is

Re: [CentOS] Rsync and differential Backups

I beg to differ. The rsync command is a fantastic backup system. It may not meet your needs, but it works really great to make different types of backups for me. I have a script I use (automate everything) to perform nightly backups with rsync. Using rsync with USB external hard drives works

Re: [CentOS] After reboot of web-server accessing website shows "Forbidden", restarting httpd all is fine

Try to set your service to enable to running automatically on boot. I hope it work's On Nov 9, 2015 9:33 PM, "Jonathan Billings" wrote: > On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 06:08:11AM -0800, Mark Milhollan wrote: > > It allows (even forces) a "dirty" environment to be provided to the >

Re: [CentOS] Rsync and differential Backups

On Mon, November 9, 2015 10:01 am, Alessandro Baggi wrote: > Hi list, > how to perform a differential backup using rsync? Differential comes from real backup systems. Rsync is much simpler IMHO, "-b" backup flag only keeps older version or deleted file/directory with extra "~" (or whatever you

Re: [CentOS] Rsync and differential Backups

Hi For backups with rsync a recommend you to follow the approach discussed on this website. It provides you everything for getting a full backup and then the incremental ones (deltas) using rsync. The only thing you need in order to do that is that the hosting filesystem supports hard links,

[CentOS] centos 6 and super jumbo frames

Hi, Has anyone using CentOS 6 been able to successfully set an mtu larger than 9710 on an interface. I am seeing super jumbo frames with length > 1. ... IP 10.79.4.53.64327 > 10.79.2.53.24294: Flags [.], seq 16060:29200, ack 1, win 32767, length 13140 ... CentOS release 6.7 (Final)

[CentOS] Rsync and differential Backups

Hi list, how to perform a differential backup using rsync? On web there is a great confusion about diff backup concept when searched with rsync. Users says diff because it copy only differences. For me differential is backup from last full backup. Other users says that to perform a

Re: [CentOS] Rsync and differential Backups

On Mon, November 9, 2015 12:42 pm, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Gordon Messmer wrote: >> On 11/09/2015 09:59 AM, John R Pierce wrote: >>> On 11/9/2015 9:50 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote: I don't see the distinction you're making. >>> >>> a incremental backup copies everything since the last

Re: [CentOS] Rsync and differential Backups

On 11/09/2015 11:10 AM, Frank Cox wrote: >And if you aren't familiar with hard links, which rsync happily creates, >they were certainly hard enough to wrap my head around, until I got it... More than one filename for a particular file. What's difficult about that? I think the difficult part

Re: [CentOS] Rsync and differential Backups

On 11/9/2015 11:34 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: I wonder how filesystem behaves when almost every file has some 400 hard links to it. (thinking in terms of a year worth of daily backups). XFS handles this fine. I have a backuppc storage pool with backups of 27 servers going back a year...

Re: [CentOS] Rsync and differential Backups

cp -a daily.0 daily.1 cp -al daily.0 daily.1 All these can be combined with an rsyncd module to allow read only root access to a remote system excluding the dirs you don't normally want to be backed up like /proc, /var/lib/mysql, /var/lib/libvirt, ... Oops... My provider email gateway has

Re: [CentOS] Rsync and differential Backups

On 11/09/2015 11:34 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: I wonder how filesystem behaves when almost every file has some 400 hard links to it. (thinking in terms of a year worth of daily backups). Why do you think that would be a problem? Most inodes have one hard link. When that link is removed, the

Re: [CentOS] Rsync and differential Backups

On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 11:36:18 -0800 Gordon Messmer wrote: > I think the difficult part is that so many people don't understand that > EVERY regular file is a hard link. It doesn't mean "more than one" at > all. A hard link is the association between a directory entry > (filename) and an inode

Re: [CentOS] Rsync and differential Backups

On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 13:42:08 -0500 m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > And if you aren't familiar with hard links, which rsync happily creates, > they were certainly hard enough to wrap my head around, until I got it... More than one filename for a particular file. What's difficult about that? > and

Re: [CentOS] centos 6 and super jumbo frames

On 11/09/2015 09:57 AM, Steve Clark wrote: So I wanted to increase the mtu on the interface so these errors would not be reported. Well, ifconfig can be used to set the MTU. The maximum size may depend on the hardware and driver that you're using.

Re: [CentOS] Rsync and differential Backups

On 11/9/2015 12:02 PM, Frank Cox wrote: Now that you point that out, I agree. I never thought about it that way before since I've always looked at a hard link as a link that you create after you create the initial file, though they become interchangeable after that. on Unix systems, the

Re: [CentOS] Rsync and differential Backups

On Mon, November 9, 2015 1:41 pm, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 11/09/2015 11:34 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >> I wonder how filesystem behaves when almost every file has some 400 hard >> links to it. (thinking in terms of a year worth of daily backups). > > Why do you think that would be a problem?

Re: [CentOS] centos 6 and super jumbo frames

On 11/9/2015 9:57 AM, Steve Clark wrote: The real issue relates to doing pcap on an interface that is hooked to a span port. The super jumbo frames cause rx_long_length_errors: 2701813 which show up in our monitoring software and the customer thinks there are error on his network. So I

Re: [CentOS-virt] Resigning as lead of the Virt SIG

On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Lars Kurth wrote: > Hi all, > > I wanted to let you know that I feel I need to step down as leader of the > Virtualisation SIG. When I originally was approached by KB to do this, it > was always clear that this would be a temporary thing

Re: [CentOS] Rsync and differential Backups

On 2015-11-09, John R Pierce wrote: > > XFS handles this fine. I have a backuppc storage pool with backups of > 27 servers going back a year... now, I just have 30 days of > incrementals, and 12 months of fulls, I'm sure you know this already, but for those who may not,

Re: [CentOS] Rsync and differential Backups

Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > On Mon, November 9, 2015 12:42 pm, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> Gordon Messmer wrote: >>> On 11/09/2015 09:59 AM, John R Pierce wrote: On 11/9/2015 9:50 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > I don't see the distinction you're making. a incremental backup copies

[CentOS] OT: bacula question

Hi, folks, Question, for those that use/have used bacula: I've been setting up backups for one team, the server on CentOS 6, but they're on Windows. If we install the director on Windows, is it possible for the users to restore files from the server to their own machine? mark