Re: [CentOS] Admins supporting both RHEL and CentOS

> -Original Message- > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Pete Biggs > Sent: den 30 november 2017 09:50 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Admins supporting both RHEL and CentOS > > > > No, it's Varian/Agilent. A bi

Re: [CentOS] Admins supporting both RHEL and CentOS

> No, it's Varian/Agilent. A big player in lab instruments. > > Funny thing, just googled them and apparently they've opensoured the culprit > software, and according to the below link, it's not locked to a particular > point release anymore! > > http://openvnmrj.org/Downloading/ > > It does

Re: [CentOS] Admins supporting both RHEL and CentOS

> -Original Message- > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Joseph L. > Casale > Sent: den 30 november 2017 01:25 > To: CentOS mailing list <centos@centos.org> > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Admins supporting both RHEL and CentOS > > ---

Re: [CentOS] Admins supporting both RHEL and CentOS

-Original Message- From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Sorin Srbu Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 12:26 AM To: CentOS mailing list <centos@centos.org> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Admins supporting both RHEL and CentOS > Seriously, some of the RHEL-box

Re: [CentOS] Admins supporting both RHEL and CentOS

-Original Message- From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Peter Eckel Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 5:21 AM To: CentOS mailing list <centos@centos.org> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Admins supporting both RHEL and CentOS > While that may seem a bit strang

Re: [CentOS] Admins supporting both RHEL and CentOS

On 11/29/2017 05:14 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > On 28 November 2017 at 16:06, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 11/28/2017 08:20 AM, James Hogarth wrote: >>> On 28 November 2017 at 13:48, Mark Haney wrote: On 11/28/2017 08:06 AM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:

Re: [CentOS] Admins supporting both RHEL and CentOS

Hi Joseph, > On 28. Nov 2017, at 14:06, Joseph L. Casale wrote: > > With a few exceptions, I see most admins treat CentOS as a single rolling > release and rely on the ABI commitment assuming things just work between > point releases. On the other hand I see the

Re: [CentOS] Admins supporting both RHEL and CentOS

On 28 November 2017 at 16:06, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 11/28/2017 08:20 AM, James Hogarth wrote: >> On 28 November 2017 at 13:48, Mark Haney wrote: >>> On 11/28/2017 08:06 AM, Joseph L. Casale wrote: With a few exceptions, I see most admins

Re: [CentOS] Admins supporting both RHEL and CentOS

> -Original Message- > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Nicolas > Kovacs > Sent: den 29 november 2017 08:31 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Admins supporting both RHEL and CentOS > > Le 29/11/2017 à 08:26, Sorin Srbu

Re: [CentOS] Admins supporting both RHEL and CentOS

Le 29/11/2017 à 08:26, Sorin Srbu a écrit : > If updated, the instrument software will break, like in an atomic mushroom > cloud, rendering critical hardware non-working and lab people standing > outside my office with torches, pitch-forks and all the shebang. > Yupp, unfortunately that's the

Re: [CentOS] Admins supporting both RHEL and CentOS

> -Original Message- > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Joseph L. > Casale > Sent: den 28 november 2017 14:06 > To: 'centos@centos.org' > Subject: [CentOS] Admins supporting both RHEL and CentOS > > With a few exceptions, I see most admins

Re: [CentOS] Admins supporting both RHEL and CentOS

On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 8:06 AM Joseph L. Casale wrote: > On the other hand I see the > opposite with RHEL where admins constrain installations to the > point release. This is most commonly due to 3rd party support stipulations (I’m looking at you Oracle/SAP) who

Re: [CentOS] Admins supporting both RHEL and CentOS

On 11/28/2017 10:20 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Joseph L. Casale wrote: >> With a few exceptions, I see most admins treat CentOS as a single >> rolling release and rely on the ABI commitment assuming things >> just work between point releases. On the other hand I see the >> opposite with RHEL

Re: [CentOS] Admins supporting both RHEL and CentOS

Joseph L. Casale wrote: > With a few exceptions, I see most admins treat CentOS as a single > rolling release and rely on the ABI commitment assuming things > just work between point releases. On the other hand I see the > opposite with RHEL where admins constrain installations to the > point

Re: [CentOS] Admins supporting both RHEL and CentOS

On 11/28/2017 08:20 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > On 28 November 2017 at 13:48, Mark Haney wrote: >> On 11/28/2017 08:06 AM, Joseph L. Casale wrote: >>> >>> With a few exceptions, I see most admins treat CentOS as a single >>> rolling release and rely on the ABI commitment

Re: [CentOS] Admins supporting both RHEL and CentOS

On 11/28/2017 08:06 AM, Joseph L. Casale wrote: What is the case with users on this list who support both [rolling releases like the normal CentOS model and 'constrain to the point releases' as is possible with RHEL]? I personally run RHEL just like my CentOS installs, as a rolling release.

Re: [CentOS] Admins supporting both RHEL and CentOS

On 28 November 2017 at 13:48, Mark Haney wrote: > On 11/28/2017 08:06 AM, Joseph L. Casale wrote: >> >> With a few exceptions, I see most admins treat CentOS as a single >> rolling release and rely on the ABI commitment assuming things >> just work between point releases.

Re: [CentOS] Admins supporting both RHEL and CentOS

On 11/28/2017 08:06 AM, Joseph L. Casale wrote: With a few exceptions, I see most admins treat CentOS as a single rolling release and rely on the ABI commitment assuming things just work between point releases. On the other hand I see the opposite with RHEL where admins constrain installations