Buenos días.
Suelo utilizar el comando mail (/bin/mail) para envíar correos con el resultado
de los scripts de copia de seguridad que hago.
Tengo un problema en un nuevo servidor (Centos5.5). Forma parte de una
plataforma de correo (como mailbox) y tiene una configuración algo particular.
Hola!
Mmm, creo que hay una aplicación llamada logwath, que te puede enviar un
email diario por ejemplo con todos los eventos del sistema, no es
exactamente lo que buscas, pero podría valer para tu caso.
Aquí hay algo de info en castellano:
Creo que podrías probar editando el archivo /etc/mail/access y aumentando la
línea
127.0.0.1 RELAY
Luego debes recrear la Base de datos del correo con:
make -C /etc/mail
y por último hacer:
service sendmail restart
--
Ramón Macías Zamora
Tecnología, Investigación y
http://www.lampugnani.com/i2332.html
___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Recall..
I run now the following task every day tar -cvzf
/rescue/website-$(date +%u).tgz /var/www/htdocs/*
I want now to move these files from the local server to a remote server via ftp.
any help.
Thanks
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 5:33 PM, cpol...@surewest.net wrote:
madu...@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/20/2011 08:31 AM, madu...@gmail.com wrote:
Recall..
I run now the following task every day tar -cvzf
/rescue/website-$(date +%u).tgz /var/www/htdocs/*
I want now to move these files from the local server to a remote server via
ftp.
any help.
Thanks
man lftp
t
Hello,
yesterday night I had a problem with
my server located at a hoster (strato.de).
I couldn't ssh to it and over the remote serial console
I saw out of memory errors (sorry, don't have the text).
Then I had reinstall CentOS 5.5/64 bit + all my setup (2h work),
because I have a contract with
2011/3/20 Alexander Farber alexander.far...@gmail.com
Hello,
yesterday night I had a problem with
my server located at a hoster (strato.de).
I couldn't ssh to it and over the remote serial console
I saw out of memory errors (sorry, don't have the text).
Then I had reinstall CentOS 5.5/64
Thanks Kenni, could you advise any commands
for checking RAID status or health
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 20.3.2011 09:25, Alexander Farber wrote:
but I'm worried about those /var/log/message:
kernel: INFO: task md1_resync:9770 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573106#c31
--
Best Regards, Markus Falb
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP
Thank you, I've decreased
/proc/sys/dev/raid/speed_limit_max
from 20 to 10.
I think I don't care about the sync speed,
but I'd like to avoid the OOM errors and
server lockup like I had yesterday
(still not sure if this will help here
or if it is just to get rid of the warning)
Regards
On 20.3.2011 13:48, Alexander Farber wrote:
Thank you, I've decreased
/proc/sys/dev/raid/speed_limit_max
from 20 to 10.
I think I don't care about the sync speed,
but I'd like to avoid the OOM errors and
server lockup like I had yesterday
So you think the OOM was related to raid
Hello,
the man syslog.conf explains how to filter syslog messages
by facility (auth, authpriv, cron, daemon, kern, ... ) or
by priority (debug, info, notice, warning, ...).
But how could I redirect messages by a program name, like
drupal or php? For example I have in /var/log/messages:
Mar 20
On 20.3.2011 14:55, Alexander Farber wrote:
the man syslog.conf explains how to filter syslog messages
by facility (auth, authpriv, cron, daemon, kern, ... ) or
by priority (debug, info, notice, warning, ...).
But how could I redirect messages by a program name, like
drupal or php? For
rsyslog can do this as well and has a great filtering feature that is
available. rsyslog will (should) be the default logging daemon in CentOS 6 (as
it is for RHEL6).
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of
Markus Falb
Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2011
2011/3/20 Alexander Farber alexander.far...@gmail.com
Thank you, I've decreased
/proc/sys/dev/raid/speed_limit_max
from 20 to 10.
20 is just the theoretical maximum. If your discs max out at
8, you'll need to set it lower than that. While syncing, you can
check the current
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 10:18 AM, Damian Tommasino
dtommas...@tradecard.com wrote:
rsyslog can do this as well and has a great filtering feature that is
available. rsyslog will (should) be the default logging daemon in CentOS 6
(as it is for RHEL6).
And if you've got a tweaked, older
There are significant components of the upstream 5.6 release which are
stuck behind the CentOS 5.6 release process, but are now incorporated
in EPEL 5 components. In particular, the php53 package is now
necessary for the drupal6 EPEL components, due to the long out of
date PHP 5.1 in the default
On 20/03/11 15:23, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
There are significant components of the upstream 5.6 release which are
stuck behind the CentOS 5.6 release process, but are now incorporated
in EPEL 5 components. In particular, the php53 package is now
necessary for the drupal6 EPEL components, due
On Sun, 20 Mar 2011, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
There are significant components of the upstream 5.6 release which are
stuck behind the CentOS 5.6 release process, but are now incorporated
in EPEL 5 components.
Sad that -- that the dependent partial Red Hat adjunct project
is not compatible
The unpleasantness of reading continual criticism, from those
who will not do the minimal local rebuilds, to use the
packages from a project not affiliated with the CentOS
project, has pretty effectively driven the CentOS core
developers away from this mailing list
...
If a person
On Sun, 20 Mar 2011, Александр Кириллов wrote:
http://www.usatoday.com/money/smallbusiness/columnist/abrams/2011-03-18-how-to-lose-a-client_N.htm
CentOS has no clients to whom a contractual duty of support is
owed. If SLAs, sales engineers, 800 numbers, and such are
wanted or needed, PLEASE
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org
[mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Athmane Madjoudj
Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2011 21:50
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] php53-5.3.3-1.el5_6.1
On 03/20/2011 01:53 AM, William Warren wrote:
On
http://www.usatoday.com/money/smallbusiness/columnist/abrams/2011-03-18-how-to-lose-a-client_N.htm
CentOS has no clients to whom a contractual duty of support is
owed. If SLAs, sales engineers, 800 numbers, and such are
wanted or needed, PLEASE buy a contract from someone
TANSTAAFL
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 11:56 AM, R P Herrold herr...@owlriver.com wrote:
On Sun, 20 Mar 2011, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
There are significant components of the upstream 5.6 release which are
stuck behind the CentOS 5.6 release process, but are now incorporated
in EPEL 5 components.
Sad that
On Mar 20, 2011, at 10:30 AM, Александр Кириллов wrote:
http://www.usatoday.com/money/smallbusiness/columnist/abrams/2011-03-18-how-to-lose-a-client_N.htm
CentOS has no clients to whom a contractual duty of support is
owed. If SLAs, sales engineers, 800 numbers, and such are
wanted or
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Jason Pyeron jpye...@pdinc.us wrote:
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org
[mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Athmane Madjoudj
Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2011 21:50
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS]
On Sun, 20 Mar 2011, Александр Кириллов wrote:
TANSTAAFL
... long overdue free lunch
I get it -- you dont (or choose not to) understand the written
word
-- Russ herrold
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
TANSTAAFL
... long overdue free lunch
I get it -- you dont (or choose not to) understand the written
word
Yeah, the picture's pretty bleak. The world's climates are changing,
the mammals are taking over, and we all have a brain about the size of a
walnut.
CentOS has no clients to whom a contractual duty of support is
owed. If SLAs, sales engineers, 800 numbers, and such are
wanted or needed, PLEASE buy a contract from someone
TANSTAAFL
And yes I started looking elsewhere and with reasonably priced offer
from
Oracle
this project is
On Sun, 2011-03-20 at 20:30 +0300, Александр Кириллов wrote:
The point is it's probably as easy to lose a community if this still
matters to the core CentOS team.
Centos offers free and very reliable Linux with free and very reliable
updates.
The people providing this free service are
Is there a preferred way to maintain a local mirror of dev.centos.org?
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
- -
- Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us -
- Principal Consultant
.
I hope the situation may change now with Oracle in direct competition with
RH
for RH and RH-based distros user base. BTW Oracle offers installable
binaries for free.
Yes, but patches (support) cost money, as you might know. Anyway, it
is better to pay for real
RH instead of oracle linux..
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 08:30:41PM +0300, Александр Кириллов wrote:
And yes I started looking elsewhere and with reasonably priced offer from
Oracle
this project is probably dead in the water.
Hahahaha.
Thanks for the chuckle. Do you have an encore performance
On 3/20/11 1:57 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
.
I hope the situation may change now with Oracle in direct competition with
RH
for RH and RH-based distros user base. BTW Oracle offers installable
binaries for free.
Yes, but patches (support) cost money, as you might know. Anyway, it
is better
Le 20/03/2011 19:36, Always Learning a écrit :
On Sun, 2011-03-20 at 20:30 +0300, Александр Кириллов wrote:
The point is it's probably as easy to lose a community if this still
matters to the core CentOS team.
Centos offers free and very reliable Linux with free and very reliable
updates.
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 09:00:54PM +0100, Alain Péan wrote:
But when the core team refuse to give any update (no news) at all (black
out), since more than one week, I consider this as even less reliable...
Stop this nonsense, would you? We rehash this same crap every
few
But when the core team refuse to give any update (no news) at all
(black
out), since more than one week, I consider this as even less
reliable...
Stop this nonsense, would you? We rehash this same crap every
few weeks and it's ridiculous.
And this same crap it is.
Александр Кириллов wrote:
CentOS has no clients to whom a contractual duty of support is
owed. If SLAs, sales engineers, 800 numbers, and such are
wanted or needed, PLEASE buy a contract from someone
TANSTAAFL
And yes I started looking elsewhere and with reasonably priced offer
from
On 3/20/2011 3:30 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 3/20/11 1:57 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
.
I hope the situation may change now with Oracle in direct competition with
RH
for RH and RH-based distros user base. BTW Oracle offers installable
binaries for free.
Yes, but patches (support) cost money,
Le 20/03/2011 21:00, Alain Péan a écrit :
With no updates since more than three months (for 5.6)
Correction : more than two months...
Alain
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Mar 20, 2011, at 1:52 PM, William Warren wrote:
On 3/20/2011 3:30 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 3/20/11 1:57 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
.
I hope the situation may change now with Oracle in direct
competition with
RH
for RH and RH-based distros user base. BTW Oracle offers
installable
On 3/20/2011 6:02 PM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 20, 2011, at 1:52 PM, William Warren wrote:
On 3/20/2011 3:30 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 3/20/11 1:57 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
.
I hope the situation may change now with Oracle in direct
competition with
RH
for RH and RH-based
It'll be either Debian or Ubuntu from now on.
Ubuntu makes a great server. But because of recent news I tried opensuse for
the first time and I really like it.
I understand the need for stability, but for what I do, having the newest
(stable) kernel and packages has a greater benefit.
Kernel
On Mar 20, 2011, at 4:00 PM, compdoc wrote:
It'll be either Debian or Ubuntu from now on.
Ubuntu makes a great server. But because of recent news I tried
opensuse for
the first time and I really like it.
Yes, PVOPS and over all better Xen tools is a great reason to use
OpenSuse.
On 3/20/2011 7:00 PM, compdoc wrote:
It'll be either Debian or Ubuntu from now on.
Ubuntu makes a great server. But because of recent news I tried opensuse for
the first time and I really like it.
I understand the need for stability, but for what I do, having the newest
(stable) kernel and
to which news are you referring about ubuntu-wise?
I meant recent redhat news about the change in how it will deliver code to
the community. They mentioned opensuse as being a competitor, I believe.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On 3/20/2011 7:11 PM, compdoc wrote:
to which news are you referring about ubuntu-wise?
I meant recent redhat news about the change in how it will deliver code to
the community. They mentioned opensuse as being a competitor, I believe.
___
their changes are really aimed at oracle..the rest is smoke and
Somehow a story led me to try opensuse. Sorry, don't know which it was that
I read.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 3/20/2011 7:29 PM, compdoc wrote:
their changes are really aimed at oracle..the rest is smoke and
Somehow a story led me to try opensuse. Sorry, don't know which it was that
I read.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On 3/20/11 6:59 PM, William Warren wrote:
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
oh they mentioned opensuse as part of the kernel patch obfuscation issue
that was raised..that's probably where opensuse got your attention..but
their mention of opensuse is jsut to hide the fact their
On Sun, March 20, 2011 7:29 pm, William Warren wrote:
their changes are really aimed at oracle..the rest is smoke and
mirrors..:) oracle is basically(pardon me here) Centos with charges.
That's basically all oracle is going with unbreakable Linux.
Not just Oracle. Novell is actively pursuing
On 3/20/2011 10:44 PM, Marko A. Jennings wrote:
On Sun, March 20, 2011 7:29 pm, William Warren wrote:
their changes are really aimed at oracle..the rest is smoke and
mirrors..:) oracle is basically(pardon me here) Centos with charges.
That's basically all oracle is going with unbreakable
I don't see the problem here. I just tested this and it works fine. The
drupal6 package only requires php 5.2 or greater.
This is out of the drupal6-date.spec file
Requires: drupal6 = 6.0, drupal6-cck, php = 5.2
You can get php52 or php53 from the IUS repository.
Install the IUS repo from
54 matches
Mail list logo
