CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2013:1505 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-1505.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2013:1504
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1504.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2013:1502
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1502.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2013:1505 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-1505.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
Les agradeceria me ayuden a configurar un nuevo puerto serial en un servidor
ibm x3400
lo necesito para instalar una impresora para un sistema de facturacion
Muchas gracias de antemano por la ayuda que me puedan brindar
mi tarjeta es PCI de la marca pctronix
Enrique Cárdenas
El CID lo tomo de aqui:
shell# host facebook.com
Ip_de_Face_book
shell# whois Ip_de_Face_book
CID Ip_del_seg_mento/mask
Saludos !
El 5 de noviembre de 2013 08:34, angel jauregui
darkdiabl...@gmail.comescribió:
@David asi tengo la denegacion tambien, pero si el usuario cambia a
https la
Yo creo que la solución ahí es forzar a que los usuarios configuren el
proxy en vez de usar proxy transparente que sólo funciona para http y no
para https.
Saludos
--
Ramón Macías Zamora
Tecnología, Investigación y Desarrollo
www.rks.ec - www.raykasolutions.com
Guayaquil - Ecuador
msn:
Acá Epe publicó algo muy sencillo, comentanos si te funcionó
http://www.ecualug.org/?q=2012/05/23/comos/centos6_%C2%BFc%C3%B3mo_bloquear_facebook_con_iptables
Cordialmente
César Martínez Mora
Ingeniero de Sistemas
SERVICOM
User Linux 494131
Números Convencionales 02-2554-271 02-2221-386
O lo otro es denegar por dominio
acl fb_cia dts_domain /etc/squid/domains
Y en domains
facebook.com
twitter.com
.
El 5 de noviembre de 2013 11:38, Ramón Macías Zamora rmac...@rks.ecescribió:
Yo creo que la solución ahí es forzar a que los usuarios configuren el
proxy en vez de usar proxy
@Ramon no entiendo cuando mencionas forzar a que los usuarios configuren
el proxy ???
Los usuarios no tienen que configurar nada, ya que por consecuencia el GW
que se les asigna es el del proxy, el proxy en si actua como
Proxy+Router+firewall.
No entendi :S
Saludos !
El 5 de noviembre de 2013
@David pero como atiendo el HTTPS ?... si mando las peticiones del 443 al
3128 no se consibe el certificado :S... Digo, porque hay IPs Fijas que si
pueden navegar libremente.
No he configurado nunca Squid para https, solo http.
Saludos !
El 5 de noviembre de 2013 08:45, David González Romero
@Cesar va por iptables :D, solo que el comando es algo distinto... lo
probare !
El 5 de noviembre de 2013 08:44, César Martinez
cmarti...@servicomecuador.com escribió:
Acá Epe publicó algo muy sencillo, comentanos si te funcionó
El link que te envie bloquea por iptables
--
Saludos
César Martinez Mora
Ingeniero de Sistemas
Servicom
Enviado desde mi mobile Samsung galaxy
angel jauregui darkdiabl...@gmail.com escribió:
@Cesar va por iptables :D, solo que el comando es algo distinto... lo
probare !
El 5 de noviembre de
mmm es qye hay varios listillos que se lo podrian brincar :S... existe la
problematica que en esa red todos tienen acceso admin a sus propios
equipos. Generalmente siempre estan conectados con una cuenta de usuario
dentro del dominio local, pero a veces se logean con la cuenta admin.
Y como soy
Hace un forward en el IPtables de que todo lo que vaya al 0/0 port 80, 443,
21, 20, etc... vaya al 3128...
Squid no necesita configuacion adicional para https lo soporta
perfectamente bien. Tu puedes controlar los accesos por dominios, o por
IP... escoge el que te guste.
Saludos,
David
El 5 de
a mi parecer esa regla de iptables no te funcionara ya que primero la estas
permitiendo el acceso a una ip en particular luego le quitas acceso a todo
el segmento de red incluyendo la ip que le permites acceso.
saludos
El 5 de noviembre de 2013 08:34, angel jauregui
Se cumple la excepcion, y funcionaria no ?
El 5 de noviembre de 2013 09:25, Ignacio Ordeñana ifor1...@gmail.comescribió:
a mi parecer esa regla de iptables no te funcionara ya que primero la estas
permitiendo el acceso a una ip en particular luego le quitas acceso a todo
el segmento de red
@David voy hacer pruebas como me indicas.
El 5 de noviembre de 2013 09:19, David González Romero
dgrved...@gmail.comescribió:
Hace un forward en el IPtables de que todo lo que vaya al 0/0 port 80, 443,
21, 20, etc... vaya al 3128...
Squid no necesita configuacion adicional para
te envio un link de una perosna que tuvo ese mismo problema
http://www.ecualug.org/?q=2011/02/10/forums/bloquear_https_de_facebook_en_ip_tablespage=3
saludos
El 5 de noviembre de 2013 09:32, angel jauregui
darkdiabl...@gmail.comescribió:
Se cumple la excepcion, y funcionaria no ?
El 5 de
Un saludo estimados amigos.
Existe alguna manera de configurar alta disponibilidad con tolerancia a
fallos con 2 ISP?
Al momento tengo tres tarjetas de red
Eth0 - ISP1
Eth1 - Red lan
Eth2 - ISP 2
Saludos,
max
___
CentOS-es mailing list
Me gustaría también saber sobre esto a ver que se puede hacer. Hasta ahora
esa batalla solo la he vencido con Ipfw en FreeBSD..
Saludos,
David
El 5 de noviembre de 2013 13:36, SisNet Corp. sis...@sisnet.com.ecescribió:
Un saludo estimados amigos.
Existe alguna manera de configurar alta
Lo que @erick intenta decir (creo) es que hagas VLAN (bonding) de las
tarjeta eth0 y eth2, esto convertira en esclavas a las eth mencionadas y
creara un unico interfaz de comunicacion (bond0) que a fin de cuenta en tus
reglas del firewall sacaras todo por bond0, y bonding terminara decidiendo
por
Yo opino que si funcionaria, ya que ambos Routers del ISP no estan
conectados (entre ellos), en ambos ruters manejar el mismo segmentos de
red. A fin de cuenta bond0 recibe el paquete o lo pasa, creo que les
llegaria a ambos ISPs el paquete.
No veo donde este el conflicto :S
Claro, una
Amigos esta claro que lo que se quiere lograr no es VLAN, sino Alta
disponibilidad. Eso es que siempre haya disponibles una ruta para sacar o
meter paquetes y que no se sature (balance de carga) una sola línea.
Bonding tiene la capacidad de hacer esto?
Saludos,
David
El 5 de noviembre de 2013
Entonces eso que me dices no es alta disponibilidad... Yo entiendo por alta
disponibilidad que si tu tienes dos enlaces, tu sistema será lo
suficientemente inteligente para poder decidir por donde enviar un paquete
y que no sature el trafico de uno de los enlaces. O sea que siempre este
disponible
Bueno alta disponibilidad inteligente creo que hiria mas por la parte de
verificar primero por cual ISP sacaria el paquete.
Con bond0 obtendria simplemente fluidez en que siempre saldrias por alguno
de los dos, si ISP 1 se cae, pues ISP 2 estaria atendiendo, tu paquete
siempre saldria.
Lo otro
Bueno esa alta disponibilidad se logra con ipfw en FreeBSD, y es un metodo
tan sencillo como lograr verificar el estado del canal de internet. En
muchos ISP que tienen más de 2 enlaces y deseas compartir ambos lo
tienen... Yo aca hice algo parecido en un CentOS pero no es de alta
disponilidad.
Vaya entonces ipfw comprueba el estado del canal, para tomar la desicion de
poner o no hay el paquete...
Y en CentOS como lo hiciste ?
El 5 de noviembre de 2013 12:00, David González Romero
dgrved...@gmail.comescribió:
Bueno esa alta disponibilidad se logra con ipfw en FreeBSD, y es un metodo
En CentOS no hice. Ipfw es de FreeBSD, esta muy documentada esta solución y
fue gracias a un amigo que trabajó conmigo en Cuba que lo hizo primero.
El 5 de noviembre de 2013 15:04, angel jauregui
darkdiabl...@gmail.comescribió:
Vaya entonces ipfw comprueba el estado del canal, para tomar la
On 11/05/2013 11:37 AM, Erick Ocrospoma wrote:
Hola,
Lo que estás buscando se le conoce como bonding :-)
no, no le llamaría bonding, bonding es cuando unes dos tarjetas hacia un
mismo switch (trunking) a nivel de capa 2 típicamente.. lo que pide es
alta disponibilidad, o balanceo de carga
Shorewall, es lo que necesitas.
Yo lo hice de esa manera y funciona muy bien.
Luis Camacho
-Mensaje original-
De: centos-es-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-es-boun...@centos.org] En
nombre de max
Enviado el: martes, 05 de noviembre de 2013 14:35
Para: centos-es@centos.org
Asunto: Re:
Lo hice en base a este documento que lo encuentras en internet:
Shorewall and Multiple Internet Connections
Tom Eastep
Luis Camacho
-Mensaje original-
De: centos-es-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-es-boun...@centos.org] En
nombre de max
Enviado el: martes, 05 de noviembre de 2013
On 05.11.2013 01:27, Gopu Krishnan wrote:
I have a CentOS linux web server in which I have multiple web sites. I
have
many website programmers now doing the coding for all the sites. How
can I
provide a key-based authentication for the programmers in such a way
that
they have access only
From: Gopu Krishnan gopukrishnan...@gmail.com
I have a CentOS linux web server in which I have multiple web sites. I have
many website programmers now doing the coding for all the sites. How can I
provide a key-based authentication for the programmers in such a way that
they have access only
freeipa
On 5 November 2013 10:31, John Doe jd...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: Gopu Krishnan gopukrishnan...@gmail.com
I have a CentOS linux web server in which I have multiple web sites. I have
many website programmers now doing the coding for all the sites. How can I
provide a key-based
Hi all,
I cant own a particular group recursively to /home since each site
files inside the /home is having their own username and passwor. I
guess i should try setfacl. Will let u knw the results.
On 11/5/13, Andrew Holway andrew.hol...@gmail.com wrote:
freeipa
On 5 November 2013 10:31, John
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of m.r...@5-cent.us
Sent: den 4 november 2013 18:06
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] [OT] Building a new backup server
Any hints as to where to start reading up, as well as
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of John R Pierce
Sent: den 4 november 2013 18:08
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] [OT] Building a new backup server
On 11/4/2013 4:44 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
I've come so far
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Les Mikesell
Sent: den 4 november 2013 18:31
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] [OT] Building a new backup server
BackupPC pools data with hardlinks so you have to put its
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Keith Keller
Sent: den 4 november 2013 20:19
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] [OT] Building a new backup server
What about this 1 GB RAM per TB disk-space for XFS in order
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
Sent: den 4 november 2013 22:30
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] [OT] Building a new backup server
In that case it might be better to switch to XFS
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 7:33 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On 11/4/2013 4:14 PM, James A. Peltier wrote:
To boot off of a 3TB disk you require a (U)EFI capable machine which
supports GPT partitions. There is no way to boot a disk that is 3TB in
size using a BIOS based machine.
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 8:09 AM, Sorin Srbu sorin.s...@orgfarm.uu.se wrote:
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
Sent: den 4 november 2013 22:30
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] [OT]
On 05.11.2013 14:35, SilverTip257 wrote:
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 8:09 AM, Sorin Srbu sorin.s...@orgfarm.uu.se wrote:
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
Sent: den 4 november 2013 22:30
To:
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 7:04 AM, Sorin Srbu sorin.s...@orgfarm.uu.se wrote:
Can e.g. BackupPC handle several file systems to backup to?
I.e. comp1 through 10 should backup to /bak1, comp 11 through 20 to /bak2 and
so on.
The main point of backuppc is that it hard-links all files with
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of SilverTip257
Sent: den 5 november 2013 14:36
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] [OT] Building a new backup server
In that case it might be better to switch to XFS which
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Les Mikesell
Sent: den 5 november 2013 15:09
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] [OT] Building a new backup server
Can e.g. BackupPC handle several file systems to backup
Les Mikesell wrote:
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 7:04 AM, Sorin Srbu sorin.s...@orgfarm.uu.se
wrote:
Can e.g. BackupPC handle several file systems to backup to?
I.e. comp1 through 10 should backup to /bak1, comp 11 through 20 to
/bak2 and so on.
The main point of backuppc is that it hard-links
Sorin Srbu wrote:
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of SilverTip257
Sent: den 5 november 2013 14:36
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] [OT] Building a new backup server
In that case it might be better to
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 8:32 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 7:04 AM, Sorin Srbu sorin.s...@orgfarm.uu.se
wrote:
Can e.g. BackupPC handle several file systems to backup to?
I.e. comp1 through 10 should backup to /bak1, comp 11 through 20 to
/bak2 and
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of m.r...@5-cent.us
Sent: den 5 november 2013 15:35
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] [OT] Building a new backup server
According to Wikipedia RHEL 7 is scheduled for
Les Mikesell wrote:
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 8:32 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 7:04 AM, Sorin Srbu sorin.s...@orgfarm.uu.se
wrote:
Can e.g. BackupPC handle several file systems to backup to?
I.e. comp1 through 10 should backup to /bak1, comp 11
Les Mikesell wrote:
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 8:32 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 7:04 AM, Sorin Srbu sorin.s...@orgfarm.uu.se
wrote:
Can e.g. BackupPC handle several file systems to backup to?
I.e. comp1 through 10 should backup to /bak1, comp 11
On 05.11.2013 16:06, Sorin Srbu wrote:
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of m.r...@5-cent.us
Sent: den 5 november 2013 15:35
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] [OT] Building a new backup server
According to
Les Mikesell wrote:
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 8:32 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 7:04 AM, Sorin Srbu sorin.s...@orgfarm.uu.se
wrote:
Can e.g. BackupPC handle several file systems to backup to?
I.e. comp1 through 10 should backup to /bak1, comp 11
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 9:27 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
No, rsync will only hardlink to instances of the same file in the same
location from previous runs. Backuppc will link every file with
snip
True. But we have a directory structure like
.../servername
|
-
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 8:20 AM, Sorin Srbu sorin.s...@orgfarm.uu.se wrote:
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Les Mikesell
Sent: den 5 november 2013 15:09
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] [OT] Building a new
Les Mikesell wrote:
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 9:27 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
No, rsync will only hardlink to instances of the same file in the same
location from previous runs. Backuppc will link every file with
snip
True. But we have a directory structure like
.../servername
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 9:52 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Have you tried backuppc? There are some tradeoffs because it makes an
extra hardlink into a pool directory tree where the name is a hash of
the content, but it takes care of all the other stuff for you and
would let you store a much
Les Mikesell wrote:
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 9:52 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Have you tried backuppc? There are some tradeoffs because it makes an
extra hardlink into a pool directory tree where the name is a hash of
the content, but it takes care of all the other stuff for you and
would
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 10:48 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I'm not quite at that scale in a single instance myself, but I'm
fairly sure many users on the backuppc mail list are, so it is not
necessarily a problem, although there are some tradeoffs with extra
overhead for compression and the
Les Mikesell wrote:
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 10:48 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I'm not quite at that scale in a single instance myself, but I'm
fairly sure many users on the backuppc mail list are, so it is not
necessarily a problem, although there are some tradeoffs with extra
overhead for
Op 02-11-13 15:26, Johan Vermeulen schreef:
Op 01-11-13 17:41, Johan Vermeulen schreef:
Op 30-10-13 17:38, John Doe schreef:
From: Johan Vermeulen jvermeu...@cawdekempen.be
no I see I have /dev/md/md_d0 /dev/md_d0p1 /dev/md_d0p2
I don't know what is what
Not sure what you did with lvm
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 11:26 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Still not sounding like we need it. We back up /etc from all our servers
(except for the compute cluster nodes every night, and keep about 5 weeks.
Home directories are 100% NFS-mounted from servers, and those are backed
up every night
On 11/5/2013 3:40 AM, Gopu Krishnan wrote:
I cant own a particular group recursively to /home since each site
files inside the /home is having their own username and passwor. I
guess i should try setfacl. Will let u knw the results.
for each $USER...
usermod -g webdev $USER
chgroup -R
On 11/5/2013 5:06 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
Do we have other options than BackupPC on CentOS that might work better?
the only reason to say it doesn't handle those usecases well is that
each incremental will probably backup the whole file so it won't dedup
at all... well, ANY backup system will be
Les Mikesell wrote:
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 11:26 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Still not sounding like we need it. We back up /etc from all our servers
(except for the compute cluster nodes every night, and keep about 5
weeks.
Home directories are 100% NFS-mounted from servers, and those are
On 05.11.2013 18:00, John R Pierce wrote:
On 11/5/2013 3:40 AM, Gopu Krishnan wrote:
I cant own a particular group recursively to /home since each site
files inside the /home is having their own username and passwor. I
guess i should try setfacl. Will let u knw the results.
for each $USER...
On 11/5/2013 7:52 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I don't think that's going to happen. First, we have an in-house developed
backup system that works just fine. Second, we*are* backup up something
over a hundred servers and workstations to a few backup servers. Third, we
are talking, in some
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 12:10 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Well, no - my manager, who's been here a bunch of years, wrote it years
ago. And I'm not quite sure what you're saying - we have a centralized
logging host, and the backup cron job on each machine emails its results
to our admin
John R Pierce wrote:
On 11/5/2013 7:52 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I don't think that's going to happen. First, we have an in-house
developed backup system that works just fine. Second, we*are* backup
up something
over a hundred servers and workstations to a few backup servers. Third,
we are
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 1:28 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
As I noted, we make sure rsync uses hard links... but we have a good
number of individual people and projects with who *each* have a good
number of terabytes of data and generated data. Some of our 2TB drives are
over 90% full, and then
Hey, Les,
Thanks for changing the subject to OT.
Les Mikesell wrote:
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 1:28 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
As I noted, we make sure rsync uses hard links... but we have a good
number of individual people and projects with who *each* have a good
number of terabytes of
On 11/5/2013 12:41 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
We have a*bunch* of d/bs. Oracle. MySQL. Postgresql. All with about a
week's dumps from every night, and then backups of them to the b/u
servers. I can't imagine how they'd be a win - don't remember just off the
top of my head if they're
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 2:41 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Hey, Les,
Thanks for changing the subject to OT.
Errr... I just replied in gmail - I think it has been there all along.
We have a *bunch* of d/bs. Oracle. MySQL. Postgresql. All with about a
week's dumps from every night, and then
Les Mikesell wrote:
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 2:41 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
snip
We have a *bunch* of d/bs. Oracle. MySQL. Postgresql. All with about a
week's dumps from every night, and then backups of them to the b/u
servers. I can't imagine how they'd be a win - don't remember just off
I noticed in /etc/inittab that it has this line:
# 0 - halt (Do NOT set initdefault to this)
It makes sense, but what if it did get set to 0 or 6? Is there a way to
boot to single-user mode anyway to edit the file and change it to a correct
value? What if it is set to a negative number or a
When does echo 0 /selinux/inforce need to be used? I.e., where is
selinux enforcing itself on the system to protect it? When I do yum
install of some package, it seems to work (not being blocked). When would
doing something not work because selinux is watching it (or whatever that
process is
Wes James wrote:
When does echo 0 /selinux/inforce need to be used? I.e., where is
selinux enforcing itself on the system to protect it? When I do yum
install of some package, it seems to work (not being blocked). When would
doing something not work because selinux is watching it (or
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 3:45 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Yeah, I know, we're trying to move stuff around, that's not infrequent,
given the amount of data my folks generate.
And that's the other place that backuppc will help. If you move a
file that is already in an existing backup, backuppc's
Les Mikesell wrote:
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 3:45 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Yeah, I know, we're trying to move stuff around, that's not infrequent,
given the amount of data my folks generate.
And that's the other place that backuppc will help. If you move a
file that is already in an
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Warren Young war...@etr-usa.com wrote:
On 11/5/2013 15:10, Wes James wrote:
I noticed in /etc/inittab that it has this line:
# 0 - halt (Do NOT set initdefault to this)
It makes sense, but what if it did get set to 0 or 6? Is there a way to
boot to
On 11/5/2013 2:15 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Wes James wrote:
When does echo 0 /selinux/inforce need to be used? I.e., where is
selinux enforcing itself on the system to protect it? When I do yum
install of some package, it seems to work (not being blocked). When would
doing something
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 3:28 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On 11/5/2013 2:15 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Wes James wrote:
When does echo 0 /selinux/inforce need to be used? I.e., where is
selinux enforcing itself on the system to protect it? When I do yum
install of some
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 4:25 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Yeah, I know, we're trying to move stuff around, that's not infrequent,
given the amount of data my folks generate.
And that's the other place that backuppc will help. If you move a
file that is already in an existing backup,
John R Pierce wrote:
On 11/5/2013 2:15 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Wes James wrote:
When does echo 0 /selinux/inforce need to be used? I.e., where is
selinux enforcing itself on the system to protect it? When I do yum
install of some package, it seems to work (not being blocked). When
Les Mikesell wrote:
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 4:25 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Yeah, I know, we're trying to move stuff around, that's not
infrequent, given the amount of data my folks generate.
And that's the other place that backuppc will help. If you move a
file that is already in an
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 3:38 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
John R Pierce wrote:
On 11/5/2013 2:15 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Wes James wrote:
When does echo 0 /selinux/inforce need to be used? I.e., where is
selinux enforcing itself on the system to protect it? When I do yum
install
Wes James wrote:
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 3:38 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
John R Pierce wrote:
On 11/5/2013 2:15 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Wes James wrote:
When does echo 0 /selinux/inforce need to be used? I.e., where
is selinux enforcing itself on the system to protect it? When I
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 3:53 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Wes James wrote:
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 3:38 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
snip
mark NOT a fan of selinux, dealt with it far too much
OK. Why not use some other linux that doesn't use selinux then? I guess
in
On 2013-11-05, Wes James compte...@gmail.com wrote:
Why not use some other linux that doesn't use selinux then?
If it were harder to disable (either temporarily or permanently) then I
could see someone making this case. But it's trivial to disable SELinux
in CentOS, so there's no real reason
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Keith Keller
kkel...@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us wrote:
On 2013-11-05, Wes James compte...@gmail.com wrote:
Why not use some other linux that doesn't use selinux then?
If it were harder to disable (either temporarily or permanently) then I
could see someone
I ran:
iptables -L
and see this:
Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT)
target prot opt source destination
ACCEPT all -- anywhere anywherestate
RELATED,ESTABLISHED
ACCEPT icmp -- anywhere anywhere
ACCEPT all -- anywhere
On 11/5/2013 3:55 PM, Wes James wrote:
I ran:
iptables -L
incomplete output. try...
iptables -L -vn
and you'll probably see that reject is for a specific packet type. the v
is for verbose, the n is for numeric output (no DNS lookup)
--
john r pierce
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 5:22 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On 11/5/2013 3:55 PM, Wes James wrote:
I ran:
iptables -L
incomplete output. try...
iptables -L -vn
and you'll probably see that reject is for a specific packet type. the v
is for verbose, the n is for numeric
On 11/05/2013 06:13 PM, Wes James wrote:
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Keith Keller
kkel...@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us wrote:
On 2013-11-05, Wes James compte...@gmail.com wrote:
Why not use some other linux that doesn't use selinux then?
If it were harder to disable (either
When I set the setfacl, wordpress sites are giving 500 internal server
error.
I am planning to set a user 'developer' with the home directory as '/home'
Inside the /home directory, each site is having its own ownership. For
example, /home/site1 should have ownership user1:user1 and /home/site2
Hello list
After samba4 installation cant install cifs-utils.
Is there an other way of mount an externall network drive without using
mount.cifs?
I try mount -t cifs //192.168.10.230/OpenShare/srvbackup /mnt/backup/
But I get is not a valid block device error
I have
99 matches
Mail list logo
